[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67ce5c97167a60cb845b9f3f55186c00fc5df078 commit r14-8990-g67ce5c97167a60cb845b9f3f55186c00fc5df078 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Feb 13

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think we should keep this open until the -mx32 stuff is resolved, then it can be closed.

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e39897ee2c73938fa940c4792d987608aeeebcd commit r14-8931-g5e39897ee2c73938fa940c4792d987608aeeebcd Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 57378 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57378 patch under test s/jumpl/jmpl/

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-10 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- Created attachment 57378 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57378=edit patch under test This implements the common case for an i386 trampoline (and, in this respect, matches the

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-09 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Guess an ia32 implementation would be even better, shouldn't be that hard. I have a draft on one of my machines, I'll post it here tomorrow.

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Guess an ia32 implementation would be even better, shouldn't be that hard.

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-09 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- I was looking at making an i686 impl. but we could also do as you suggest for gcc-14.

[Bug target/113855] [14 Regression] __gcc_nested_func_ptr_{created,deleted} exports from 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1

2024-02-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113855 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Priority|P3