http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15
14:31:02 UTC ---
We fail to fold
(short unsigned int) ( X | (signed short) Y )
to
(short unsigned int ) X | (short unsigned int) Y
and thus end up with needlessly many conversion
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #23 from Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
--- Comment #22 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-11-10
13:36:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 28655
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28655
another test case
I'm using a construct similar to the 'f1' function of the initial te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
--- Comment #21 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-10 12:15:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Please can the RMs have a new look at this.
This is tuning decision, and I see Intel folks in the CC. I see no problem in
changing these defaults
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P3
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4
