--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-03-02 15:02 ---
Fixed in mainline. IMO this is not worth to fix on branches due to comment #5.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30413
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 11:14 ---
Subject: Bug 30413
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jan 14 11:14:20 2007
New Revision: 120769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120769
Log:
PR target/30413
* config/i386/i386.c (print_operand)
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-01-14 11:32 ---
Although %zN is not documented, we advertise it in config/i386/i386.md:
;; The special asm out single letter directives following a '%' are:
;; 'z' mov%z1 would be movl, movw, or movb depending on the mode of
;;
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:02 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from cnovikov at pacbell dot net 2007-01-14 06:17 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Confirmed, not a regression.
You set keywords to ice-on-invalid-code. In my opinion, the code is valid. %z
is supposed to add an appropriate data width IA-32 insn suffix: l for dwords, w
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-14 06:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
Confirmed, not a regression.
You set keywords to ice-on-invalid-code.
Maybe you are correct but I don't think %zN is documented anywhere.
--
pinskia
