--- Comment #15 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-04 15:58 ---
Subject: Bug 31733
Author: sje
Date: Mon Jun 4 15:58:12 2007
New Revision: 125312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=125312
Log:
PR target/31733
* cfgrtl.c (rtl_verify_flow_info):
--- Comment #16 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-06-04 16:03 ---
Fixed now. All testcases are working with ToT.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 11:37 ---
I just saw this again with 20070515 r124745.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-05-17 11:37 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c -O2 ddd-exit.ii
/home/tbm/src/ddd-3.3.11/./ddd/exit.C: In function 'void
gdb_exceptionHP(Agent*, void*, void*)':
/home/tbm/src/ddd-3.3.11/./ddd/exit.C:975: error: return
--- Comment #12 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-05-17 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=13568)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13568action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31733
--- Comment #13 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-05-17 11:38 ---
Steve, do you think you could investigate again because this issue is still
there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31733
--- Comment #14 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-05-17 18:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=13574)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13574action=view)
reduced test case
Here is a reduced test case. I think the problem is related to having the
optimizer remove the
--- Comment #9 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-05-15 21:06 ---
I am going to close this defect as WORKSFORME. The bug can be reproduced with
124216 but is fixed in 124217 and later version. Whether the bug is really
fixed or became latent is not clear but it doesn't happen with
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-05-03 14:12 ---
It's hard to say when this was introduced. The problem is that starting with
r123363, gcc won't accept this preprocessed code. I used preprocessed code
generated by 4.3 20070326 to test older revisions, but there the bug
--- Comment #8 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-05-03 19:36 ---
I went back to r124216 and added a print to see what the next instruction was,
since it wasn't a barrier. What I found was a NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL,
followed by a barrier. I am guessing we want to ignore that (and any
--- Comment #4 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-02 15:40 ---
I cannot reproduce this.
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nobody at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-05-02 23:03 ---
I just checked and you get the ICE with r124216 but not anymore with r124217.
I'm not sure r124217 fixed this problem or just made it latent; maybe Richi
can comment.
Anyway, I'll try to find out when the ICE first appeared
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-02 23:07 ---
That patch certainly didn't fix anything, so the problem is probably latent.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31733
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-04-30 15:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=13465)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13465action=view)
testcase
It doesn't seem to get smaller than this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31733
--- Comment #3 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 18:09 ---
Might be mine, I will check.
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
17 matches
Mail list logo
