--- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com 2008-10-12
16:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created an attachment (id=16485)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16485action=view) [edit]
possible patch to fix the problem
I am pretty sure that this
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-12 17:50 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I too had this ICE. The patch seems to make it work nicely.
Same thing here on i686-apple-darwin9. The test suite (all languages but ada)
passed without regression.
--
--- Comment #6 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 19:44 ---
Confirmed, the regression tester sees it too.
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 20:31
---
I see a failure on sparc-solaris8/10 too. Configury of stage2 fails.
Applying the mentioned patch cures compilation.
My sparc config is with multilib. 32-bit/64-bit.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #8 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-10-12 21:13
---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 20:31
---
I see a failure on
--- Comment #9 from richard dot guenther at gmail dot com 2008-10-12 21:17
---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #7 from
--- Comment #10 from zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 21:18 ---
Subject: Bug 37808
Author: zadeck
Date: Sun Oct 12 21:16:57 2008
New Revision: 141078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141078
Log:
2008-10-12 Kenneth Zadeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #11 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-10-12 21:19
---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #12 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-10-12 21:22
---
fixed with the above patch.
--
zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 02:20 ---
This a target specific failure.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-10-12 04:56
---
Created an attachment (id=16485)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16485action=view)
possible patch to fix the problem
I am pretty sure that this fixes it, but i need to do more testing.
kenny
11 matches
Mail list logo