https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, vgupta at synopsys dot com wrote:
> However I'm curious that the test uses qNaN. What is the expected behavior for
> sNaN. If you tweak the testcase slightly as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #12 from Vineet Gupta ---
oops the ARC bug is (PR 92846) not (PR 92845)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vgupta at synopsys dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Please file a separate bug for hppa, just as we have separate bugs for the
powerpc and s390 back end issues. Assuming hppa-hpux has working fenv.h,
failure on hppa is probably a back-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #7)
> Shouldn't the new test case have been marked XFAIL for powerpc64 and s390?
> It fails on powerpc64 for sure.
This is up to target maintainer. XFAIL will get the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Oct 22 19:04:36 2017
New Revision: 253986
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253986=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/52451
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
Szabolcs Nagy nszabolcs at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nszabolcs at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #3 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2012-04-23 09:37:45
UTC ---
Compiling with the -mno-ieee-fp option fixes this bug. It seems like the
behavior of this option is reversed from the documentation; -mno-ieee-fp gives
IEEE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx 2012-03-15 16:23:11
UTC ---
Try foo(NAN,NAN) and then check for the INVALID exception. It's not set.
12 matches
Mail list logo
