http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05
11:44:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
H have backported similar change to 4.7 branch.
Thanks for the backport.
Please reopen the PR if there are still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 12:11:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
H have backported similar change to 4.7 branch.
Thanks for the backport.
Please reopen the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 12:28:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
H have backported similar change to 4.7 branch.
Thanks for the backport.
Please reopen the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05
12:41:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
You should use t-softfp instead of 386/t-softfp for i[34567]86-*-rtems* in
libgcc/config.host.
In fact, there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 14:15:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
You should use t-softfp instead of 386/t-softfp for i[34567]86-*-rtems* in
libgcc/config.host.
In fact, there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-05 14:24:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Then the problem is either in newlib or generic libgcc configury.
Please note that t-fdpbit is not enabled by default for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05
14:38:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
Then the problem is either in newlib or generic libgcc configury.
I meanwhile came to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04 18:58:32 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Nov 4 18:58:29 2012
New Revision: 193140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193140
Log:
PR target/55175
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-04 18:59:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I can confirm i386-rtems4.11-gcc now builds.
@Uros: I am inclined to believe this patch probably should be backported to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-03
06:25:33 UTC ---
I can confirm i386-rtems4.11-gcc now builds.
@Uros: I am inclined to believe this patch probably should be backported to
4.7.x.
At least, RTEMS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
12 matches
Mail list logo
