https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||275438859 at qq dot com
--- Comment #58
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Ivan D Vasin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nisavid at gmail dot com
--- Comment #57
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #56 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Dec 18 20:12:44 2014
New Revision: 218873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218873root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61407
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Derrick Kay derrick.k at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||derrick.k at gmx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #54 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Derrick Kay from comment #53)
I've redirected that question to the mailing list (and answered it):
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-11/msg00088.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #55 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Derrick Kay from comment #53)
If you just want the gfortran compiler for Yosemite, either install the gcc49
package under the fink (http://www.finkproject.org), MacPorts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #52 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Attachment 33932 should be superseded by attachment 33970 from bug 63810.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #51 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33932 [details]
Patch for gcc 4.8 branch (based on gcc 4.8.3)
The test results for this 4.8.3 GCC with the above patch are good:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #48 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33932
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33932action=edit
Patch for gcc 4.8 branch (based on gcc 4.8.3)
This is the patch for GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #49 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #45)
(In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #42)
The committed patch is incorrect. It makes an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #50 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
---
As this bug is now marked as resolved, I've filed #63810 to address the
remaining issues. Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org is working on a
patch to address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cloverm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #43 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
---
Created attachment 33824
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33824action=edit
gcc 4.2 based patch which handles tiny version numbers properly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #41 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Sep 29 18:40:57 2014
New Revision: 215690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215690root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61407
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #40 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Sep 14 08:05:43 2014
New Revision: 215251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215251root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61407
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #38 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Created attachment 33464
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33464action=edit
Corrected dirent patch
Couple of things:
1) The version of Sanitizer included
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #39 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #38)
2) You should report this bug upstream.
http://compiler-rt.llvm.org
On second thought, they probably won't accept it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larryv at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #35 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Created attachment 33461
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33461action=edit
MacPorts log from a failed attempt to build libgcc @4.9.1_0 (x86_64)
There’s a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #36 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #34)
I got the build to succeed by changing
# if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE)
to
# if !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #37 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Okay, what I said initially was correct. This was the specific change I made.
https://gist.github.com/larryv/9b1cd34a34733c10f734
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #32 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
(In reply to Ilya Mikhaltsou from comment #31)
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #29)
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #28)
I noticed that MacPorts is using…
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #33 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #30)
The proposed changes in v4 of the patch aren't building here on 10.9. I
don't see how
# if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #27 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
Updated patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02415.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #29 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #28)
I noticed that MacPorts is using…
#if SANITIZER_MAC ( !defined(__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T) ||
__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T)
and
# if !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #30 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
The proposed changes in v4 of the patch aren't building here on 10.9. I don't
see how
# if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE)
can completely substitute for…
# if !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #31 from Ilya Mikhaltsou morpheby at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #29)
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #28)
I noticed that MacPorts is using…
#if SANITIZER_MAC (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #25 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
(In reply to Dominyk Tiller from comment #24)
It looks like gcc are gonna require someone to submit this patch to their
mailing list before we see any further activity on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #26 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
Patches have been sent to the mailing list -
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02344.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02345.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #24 from Dominyk Tiller dominyktiller at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #16)
Created attachment 33180 [details]
Patch For GCC 4.9.1 On Yosemite
Requires DP 4 (or above), as I have also removed the fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #22 from Eric Martin ericmark26 at gmail dot com ---
Was your gcc.rb git post intended as a replacement file for gcc.rb, or as a
patch for it? Either way, using it for either purpose has been unsuccessful for
me. I am getting:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #20 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
(In reply to aggrostyle from comment #18)
Guys, a question... how can i apply the patch? I've read that i have to add:
patch do
url
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #21 from aggrostyle at gmail dot com ---
Thank you! It worked perfect last night!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
aggrostyle at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aggrostyle at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #19 from Alexander Bock alexandermbock at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to aggrostyle from comment #18)
Guys, a question... how can i apply the patch? I've read that i have to add:
patch do
url
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #16 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
Created attachment 33180
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33180action=edit
Patch For GCC 4.9.1 On Yosemite
Requires DP 4 (or above), as I have also removed the fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Alexander Bock alexandermbock at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #15 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #14)
The issue with Availability.h has been fixed as of Developer Preview 4,
however `all-stage1-target-libsanitizer` still fails with Error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Dominyk Tiller dominyktiller at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Eric Martin ericmark26 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericmark26 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Ilya Mikhaltsou morpheby at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||morpheby at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Mikhaltsou morpheby at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #9)
(In reply to Ilya Mikhaltsou from comment #8)
Created attachment 32949 [details]
Patch to compile gcc on OS X 10.10 Yosemite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denji0k at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So it turns out there is a defect report against the C, see PR 36453 but that
is only for #elif and not #if defined(a) a()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
Looks like the Mac OS X's headers are not C99/C++98 compatible at all:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #3 from kassafari at gmail dot com ---
Alright, reported to apple as well [:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This has nothing to do with evaluation, it's a syntax error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like the Mac OS X's headers are not C99/C++98 compatible at all:
57 matches
Mail list logo
