[Bug target/70319] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline execution test

2016-03-25 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70319 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/70319] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline execution test

2016-03-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70319 --- Comment #13 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Fri Mar 25 01:00:40 2016 New Revision: 234476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234476=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70319 * config/pa/pa.md (bswapdi2): Use a scratch

[Bug target/70319] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline execution test

2016-03-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70319 --- Comment #12 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Fri Mar 25 00:59:02 2016 New Revision: 234475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234475=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70319 * config/pa/pa.md (bswapdi2): Use a scratch

[Bug target/70319] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline execution test

2016-03-23 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70319 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-03-23, at 7:09 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > That's wrong, it must simply use a scratch register. Thanks very much Eric. When I wrote the pattern, I thought the '+' in

[Bug target/70319] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sso/q2.c -O1 -fno-inline execution test

2016-03-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70319 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target --- Comment #10 from Eric