https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70356
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess we need to wait on Kirill for the reason why the test has been added.
It could be that it has been assembled badly, and then dg-do assemble is
completely reasonable. Or it could be added for other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70356
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Seems this test is the only one in gcc.target/i386 that has
> dg-require-effective-target above dg-do.
> Can you please try:
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70356
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
[...]
> But, avx-vextractf128-256-5.c has:
> dg-require-effective-target avx512f, so wonder what is the problem.
> Does the order of dg-do vs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70356
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems this test is the only one in gcc.target/i386 that has
dg-require-effective-target above dg-do.
Can you please try:
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx-vextractf128-256-5.c 2016-01-28
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70356
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
