https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
--- Comment #8 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 71722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
*** Bug 71731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Jul 12 18:12:11 2016
New Revision: 238258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238258=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
[gcc]
2016-07-12 Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Jul 12 17:42:04 2016
New Revision: 238256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238256=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-07-12 Michael Meissner
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 38878
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38878=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
It turns out, when I implemented the xxperm variant (and when Kelvin used my
code to add xxpermr) I mis-read the ISA 3.0 manual. I thought:
xxperm a,b,c
was equivalent to:
vperm a,a,b,c
when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|