https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr72802.c failed for me (likely with -mcpu=power9) with
the version of gcc I happened to have at the time I developed the patch in #c5.
I'm not sure now whether it was to demonstrate the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Aug 9 05:44:39 2016
New Revision: 239270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239270=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR72802 part 2, reload ICE
PR target/72802
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Aug 9 05:43:29 2016
New Revision: 239269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239269=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR72802 part 1, fix constraints for lxssp/stxssp
PR target/72802
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gmail dot com|
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Aug 8 09:06:49 2016
New Revision: 239234
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239234=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR72802 part 2, reload ICE
After fixing the constraint problem, we hit an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Aug 8 09:05:16 2016
New Revision: 239233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239233=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR72802 part 1, fix constraints for lxssp/stxssp
We can't use "o"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
When -mno-powerpc64, I see. Thanks. Yeah this needs some untangling.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
wY is using mem_operand_gpr which is designed for gpr loads/stores. When -m32,
mem_operand_gpr does not enforce multiple-of-4 offsets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why is "wY" wrong for 32-bit? I don't see it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
12 matches
Mail list logo