[Bug target/80505] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80505] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ppc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc*-*-*

[Bug target/80505] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > And by the way, I tend to think that the testcase should use > > -fno-indirect-inlining option, the indirect call is direct when the > > IPA layer sees it. > >

[Bug target/80505] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/80505] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80505] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80505 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org