[Bug target/81362] [8.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-57.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- This fixes both no-vfa-vect-57.c and no-vfa-vect-61.c for -m64 and -m32.

[Bug target/81362] [8.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-57.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362 --- Comment #6 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Created attachment 41715 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41715=edit Tentative patch Removed the npeel function argument, also removed body_cost_vec and the

[Bug target/81362] [8.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-57.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362 --- Comment #5 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Ah, npeel is set by vect_peeling_hash_get_lowest_cost although the corresponding dr is not used afterwards. It should be save to get rid of the npeel parameter since we use the returned

[Bug target/81362] [8.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-57.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- There is no VSX on G5.

[Bug target/81362] [8.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-57.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 41709 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41709=edit no-vfa-vect-57.s

[Bug target/81362] [8.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-57.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 41708 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41708=edit no-vfa-vect-57.c.159t.vect

[Bug target/81362] [8.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-57.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81362 --- Comment #1 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Could you provide the vectorizer dump (-fdump-tree-vect-details)? The generated assembly might also be interesting as well as the exact command line for building (in the test suite logs). I