https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #16 from itsimbal at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: itsimbal
Date: Mon Feb 19 16:25:49 2018
New Revision: 257809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257809=gcc=rev
Log:
CET shouldn't be enabled in 32-bit run-time libraries by defualt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #14)
> Created attachment 43410 [details]
> patch #3
>
> The simplified patch.
Looks good to me. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #14 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Created attachment 43410
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43410=edit
patch #3
The simplified patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #11)
> Created attachment 43408 [details]
> patch #2
case "$host" in
- i[[34567]]86-*-linux* | x86_64-*-linux*)
-case "$enable_cet" in
- default)
- #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #12 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #9)
> > How can I check the fixes w/o old HW? I tried specifying --target=pentium to
> > configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #11 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Created attachment 43408
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43408=edit
patch #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #9)
> How can I check the fixes w/o old HW? I tried specifying --target=pentium to
> configure but the build has failed with the message
>
> *** Configuration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #9 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
How can I check the fixes w/o old HW? I tried specifying --target=pentium to
configure but the build has failed with the message
*** Configuration i586-pc-none not supported
make[1]: ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #4)
> > > Created attachment 43400 [details]
> > > patch
> >
> > 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #7 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> (In reply to igor.v.tsimbalist from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 43400 [details]
> > patch
>
> 2 questions:
>
> 1. Should 32-bit multilib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #5 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Beside the patch configure files have to be regenerated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #4 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Created attachment 43400
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43400=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
Gianluigi Tiesi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sherpya at netfarm dot it
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
> How old are the CPUs which treat it as UD? Older than i686/Pentium Pro?
> Thanks.
They are NOPs since Pentium Pro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
17 matches
Mail list logo
