[Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09

2023-07-16 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09

2023-07-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Has this been fixed with the commit?

[Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09

2023-06-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Ajit Kumar Agarwal : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17714c08e9013b51cf8d04ac39f844d355c923f2 commit r14-1777-g17714c08e9013b51cf8d04ac39f844d355c923f2 Author: Ć¢Ajit Kumar

[Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09

2023-05-18 Thread aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880 --- Comment #2 from Ajit Kumar Agarwal --- Yes these are redundant zero extend and can be removed. I will update the tests and send the patch for review.

[Bug testsuite/109880] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-int.p8.c fails after r14-916-g9417b30499ce09

2023-05-16 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109880 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Ever confirmed|0