--- Comment #8 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-09 21:45 ---
Note this issue is not c++ or libstdc++ specific. I see timeouts on old
hardware all over the testsuite on gcc-testresults.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
--- Comment #7 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 21:10 ---
Whoops, Janis, you are right. Sorry for the false alarm. The fancy dejagnu line
I spit out at you does nothing.
I also tried to hack up this as you suggested:
Index: testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 06:26 ---
Janis, this is how to set timeout on the make check command line:
time make check RUNTESTFLAGS=-v -v -v -v --tool_opts timeout=300
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-13 16:54 ---
Benjamin, I had tried that, but it adds timeout=300 to the options passed to
the compiler. Does it really work for you?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
--- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-09-12 16:36 ---
I wonder if it would be possible to implement something like 'dg-timeout 600'
so that the timeout could be changed for just some tests and possibly just on
some hosts by using the target option with dg-timeout. Most of
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 23:23 ---
I'm starting to figure out how all this works. A quick fix for now might be,
as Benjamin suggested, for libstdc++.exp to only change the timeout value if it
doesn't already exist. That could be done with
if
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 23:42 ---
Mike, I added you to the cc: list because you know a lot about how DejaGnu is
used with the GCC testsuite and undoubtedly have useful things to add to the
discussion.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-31 02:53 ---
Confirmed, this is a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
