[Bug testsuite/40532] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-65.c (test for excess errors)

2009-06-26 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-26 09:02 --- Subject: Bug 40532 Author: uros Date: Fri Jun 26 09:02:04 2009 New Revision: 148967 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148967 Log: PR testsuite/40532 * gcc.dg/builtins-65.c: Require

[Bug testsuite/40532] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-65.c (test for excess errors)

2009-06-26 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-06-26 09:04 --- Fixed. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/40532] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-65.c (test for excess errors)

2009-06-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-06-25 07:26 --- (In reply to comment #2) Can you put HAVE_C99_RUNTIME around problematic conversions (just copy the approach from builtins-18.c) ? Attached diff. However, there's still a call left to linK_error. This is due to

[Bug testsuite/40532] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-65.c (test for excess errors)

2009-06-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-06-25 07:33 --- (In reply to comment #5) I will simply disable builtins-65.c for non-C99 targets ... like this: Index: builtins-65.c === --- builtins-65.c

[Bug testsuite/40532] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-65.c (test for excess errors)

2009-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-06-24 06:35 --- Can you put HAVE_C99_RUNTIME around problematic conversions (just copy the approach from builtins-18.c) ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40532

[Bug testsuite/40532] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-65.c (test for excess errors)

2009-06-24 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-06-25 00:32 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-65.c (test for excess errors) Can you put HAVE_C99_RUNTIME around problematic conversions (just copy the approach from builtins-18.c) ? Attached diff.