[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44e7e4498c3cdc27e087ab80aa76dac41819702f commit r14-4789-g44e7e4498c3cdc27e087ab80aa76dac41819702f Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

2023-10-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/621989.html for the prototype patch. I still think it might be too aggressive, an alternative I didn't yet implement is turning everything in

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-07-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-07-30 Thread shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #6 from Shaohua Li --- I tried to bisect it and it was bisected to r13-3875-g9e11ceef165

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-07-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.2|13.3 --- Comment #5 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-06-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- There's now a single strip_offset left in IVOPTs, the problematic one. That one isn't trivial to convert to split_constant_offset since that only deals with pointer or sizetype quantities in a way that's

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-06-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-06-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- [local count: 5636687]: + _141 = (int) _5; + _144 = _141 * 2; + ivtmp.22_136 = (unsigned int) _144; ... [local count: 51242611]: - # d.7_1 = PHI <0(26), _48(23)> + # ivtmp.22_17 = PHI ... -

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-06-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/110243] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2023-06-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110243 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wrong code at -O3 on|[13/14 Regression] Wrong