--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 21:06 ---
What happened to this one since, ehm, 2.5 years ago?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 21:06 ---
What happened to this one since, ehm, 2.5 years ago?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 21:22 ---
They are no longer XFAILed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 20:46 ---
Subject: Bug 29598
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Apr 13 20:46:37 2007
New Revision: 123794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123794
Log:
PR tree-optimization/29598
*
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 20:47 ---
Subject: Bug 29598
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Apr 13 20:47:39 2007
New Revision: 123795
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123795
Log:
PR tree-optimization/29598
*
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-25 23:04 ---
This is mentioned in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg01003.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
