--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 05:46
---
Fixed. This should have been closed a while back.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 08:16 ---
Subject: Bug 30858
Author: dorit
Date: Thu Feb 22 08:16:18 2007
New Revision: 10
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=10
Log:
PR tree-optimization/30858
* tree-vectorizer.c
--- Comment #7 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-02-21 12:17 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
proposed patches - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01734.html
would you mind giving these patches a try? (to see what's the next ICE...?)
If the patches have been applied to gcc
--- Comment #8 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-02-21 19:31 ---
Is this acceptable ?
sure, thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30858
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-02-22 01:01 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30858
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01774.html
--
--- Comment #6 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-02-20 22:56 ---
proposed patches - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01734.html
I have thrown most of Suse Linux 10.3 at it and it has crashed
in a few places.
would you mind giving these patches a try? (to see what's
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 13:17 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-02-19 14:12 ---
Looks like I wasn't careful enough with my fix for PR30771. Here is a fix for
that fix I'm now testing:
Index: tree-vect-analyze.c
===
---
