[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 26 21:29:30 2013 New Revision: 205417 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205417root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59014 * tree-vrp.c

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-07 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'd say this is .vrp1. In .mergephi2, we have bb 4: a.1_11 = a.1_5; d = a.1_11; return 0; but in .vrp1: bb 4: a.1_13 = 0; a.1_11 = 0; d = 0; return 0; And

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- And, it's not related to -Os; the bug triggers exactly when VRP is run.

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- It seems we create wrong ASSERT_EXPR: a.1_5 = a; _7 = (_Bool) a.1_5; _8 = _4 | _7; if (_8 != 0) goto bb 5; else goto bb 6; bb 6: a.1_15 = ASSERT_EXPR

[Bug tree-optimization/59014] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-11-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) Why does it think that a.1_5 must be 0? That's because VRP is innocent here after all, it's the forwprop1 what does - _6 = a.1_5 1;