[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Jul 12 22:06:51 2016 New Revision: 238268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238268=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/68961 * config/i386/sse.md

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jul 12 08:56:14 2016 New Revision: 238238 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238238=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-12 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 29 07:52:35 2016 New Revision: 237840 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237840=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-29 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Note that the fix depends on "bogus" cost for the vector construction on x86_64. Currently it is two stmts (nunits / 2 + 1) but the vector can be constructed by a single unpcklpd stmt. The correct cost is

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 15 11:49:43 2016 New Revision: 232415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232415=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-15 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Confirmed on powerpc64le: > > $ /build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk/gcc -O3 -S -Wall -Wextra > -Wpedantic -mcpu=power8 -o/dev/stdout >

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-unknown-linux-gn

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer --- No, it fails on big endian, too.