[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #30 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 15 07:28:44 2016 New Revision: 235006 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235006=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-15 Richard Biener Alan Modra

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #29 from Pat Haugen --- Verified the patch also fixes the problem with h264ref benchmark.

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #28 from Alan Modra --- Bootstrapped and regression testing now completed on both powerpc64le-linux and -m64/-m32 on a power7 powerpc64-linux host, all langs. No regressions found, and it seems this also fixes

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #27 from Bill Schmidt --- However, that was with the parentheses misplaced. I've completed a bootstrap and regression test on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with this corrected, and everything is still fine.

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #26 from Bill Schmidt --- Ah, I see from IRC that Alan has already done a regstrap and reported no failures.

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #25 from Bill Schmidt --- I've verified the patch indeed fixes the test from c#11. Regstrap in progress. One nit: The parentheses in the proposed patch are slightly wrong, should be: && (LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #24 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 38266 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38266=edit testcase for gcc.dg/vect/ Revised testcase checking multiple offsets, using an array of structs so not dependent on var

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener --- But that's ok - we are storing the same scalar element: t.i:12:3: note: Load permutation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t.i:12:3: note: no array mode for V8HI[16] t.i:12:3: note: Final SLP tree for

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-13 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #22 from Bill Schmidt --- The most suspicious thing I see in r224221 is following the gap adjustment: vect__39.29_261 = REALIGN_LOAD ; vectp_s.20_260 = vectp_s.20_278 +

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-13 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #21 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 38258 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38258=edit Vectorization dump for r224221

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-13 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #20 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 38257 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38257=edit Vectorization dump for r224220

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

2016-04-13 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] h264ref |[6 Regression] h264ref