https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Sep 13 16:40:27 2017
New Revision: 252345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252345=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-08-08 Bill Schmidt
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Aug 16 14:13:27 2017
New Revision: 251122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251122=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-08-16 Bill Schmidt
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Aug 16 14:11:26 2017
New Revision: 251121
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251121=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-08-16 Bill Schmidt
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Aug 16 14:09:15 2017
New Revision: 251120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251120=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-08-16 Bill Schmidt
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
Fixed on trunk so far, and verified that a modified backport fixes the limited
range on 5.4 where the provided test case fails. Backports to follow in about
a week after burn-in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Aug 8 12:52:22 2017
New Revision: 250955
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250955=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-08-08 Bill Schmidt
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
OK, I've now confirmed this is the problem. I have a rough patch for trunk,
and backporting it to GCC 5 r236439 verifies that this fixes it. Still
verifying bootstrap/regression on trunk, and need to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
This is likely the same as another problem that recently came up (not yet filed
as the source is sensitive). SLSR is sensitive to addresses of PHI
instructions remaining the same throughout the pass, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Hm, the symptom looks very much like another issue I've been looking at on
trunk. There may be an issue with the statement->candidate mapping hash table
that's responsible for both. It appears to be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Doesn't reproduce for powerpc64le. I'll have to build a cross.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
>
> Martin Liška changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo