[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-09-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:20:57 2017 New Revision: 252535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252535=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-22 Bill Schmidt PR

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-08-22 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-08-22 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Tue Aug 22 17:32:26 2017 New Revision: 251286 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251286=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-22 Bill Schmidt PR

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-08-18 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Patch submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg01145.html

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-08-16 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- Just for the record, the problem disappears with r250523, in which a change to reassociation of multiplication in match.pd causes the SLSR opportunities to disappear. So the SLSR problem has just gone

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-08-16 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- With a cross it doesn't reproduce for current trunk (r251128) either, but does reproduce with r250217 as originally reported. So I can look at that. Going to check what made the problem go away also...

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-08-16 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Doesn't reproduce for powerpc64le on current trunk. I'll try a cross.

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-07-25 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] [8 Regression] gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

2017-07-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED