[Bug web/35777] no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation

2009-10-15 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 17:29 --- There is now an announcement and a status page for the library work. Thanks. -- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug web/35777] no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation

2009-08-06 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-06 14:41 --- We can say that this is confirmed. From the messages, I think the people that could fix this bug do not see clearly what the reporter wants. So probably a detailed list of TODO items would help. It seems the request

[Bug web/35777] no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation

2008-04-04 Thread brian at dessent dot net
--- Comment #4 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-04-04 23:53 --- Subject: Re: no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: I can tell you that OpenMP has similar issues and nobody complained about that except for me. DFP

[Bug web/35777] no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation

2008-04-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-05 00:07 --- (In reply to comment #4) I don't see OpenMP documented there at all. What about http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/libgomp/? Still not part of the C/C++ Language Extension section of the documentation. I

[Bug web/35777] no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation

2008-03-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 19:52 --- I can tell you that OpenMP has similar issues and nobody complained about that except for me. DFP is actually already documented in the correctly place:

[Bug web/35777] no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation

2008-03-31 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 23:01 --- I've added a note to gcc-4.3/changes.html in the C Family section, which is a start towards fixing this issue. I'll update the section of the GCC Manual that documents the extension to list the latest published draft

[Bug web/35777] no DFP announcement, no example text, very vague documentation

2008-03-31 Thread bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 23:59 --- I think the manual should just mention the existence of the formats (in the same way that we mention that the compiler implements IEEE 754) and which targets use which formats by default. --