[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/54277] Template class member referred to with implicit this inside lambda is incorrectly const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54277 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug driver/48306] [4.4 Regression] presence of gcc subdir with . in PATH causes breakdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmlr at mlotz dot

[Bug bootstrap/54260] GCC 4.7.1 fails to build.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54260 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-08-16 07:24:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) 99 /home/Feto/sw/gcc/build/./gcc/cc1: error while loading shared libraries: libmpc.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No

[Bug target/54280] New: AVR target: -mmcu=atxmega128b support missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54280 Bug #: 54280 Summary: AVR target: -mmcu=atxmega128b support missing Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug bootstrap/54260] GCC 4.7.1 fails to build.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54260 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51494] Legal program rejection - capturing this when using static method inside lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug middle-end/54224] [4.8 Regression] Bogus -Wunused-function warning with static function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 09:56:51 UTC --- c) For the program in comment 0, one enters rtx_for_function_call [...] However, that function is called *AFTER* check_global_declaration_1 and comes thus

[Bug c++/52806] zero as null pointer constant in C++98 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52806 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-08-16 10:07:10 UTC --- See my Comment #2 and #3: I'm still convinced that the warning can be useful in C++98 mode too. Unless Jason or another C++ front-end maintainer

[Bug target/25629] -mcpu=601 doesn't use MQ register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25629 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/41743] Missing loop optimisation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41743 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52806] zero as null pointer constant in C++98 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52806 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 10:33:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Unfortunately the user *will* have warnings if she passes the warning flag but not -std=c++11. So don't use that warning flag.

[Bug middle-end/41741] -Os generates bigger code than -O2 for simple loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41741 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/54269] [4.8 Regression] memory usage too large when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54269 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/41742] Unnecessary zero-extension at -O2 but not -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41742 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/54271] [4.7/4.8 Regression] libgcrypt CRC24RFC2440 30% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54271 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #48 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 10:52:20 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Thu Aug 16 10:52:14 2012 New Revision: 190442 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190442 Log: PR middle-end/54146

[Bug bootstrap/54281] New: [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 Bug #: 54281 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dnovillo at

[Bug other/54279] [4.8 Regression] first stage build with g++ fails with . as the first component of $PATH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54279 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/53343] [4.8 regression] options.c:9944:1: error: no previous prototype for 'common_handle_option_auto' breaks bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53343 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/53062] [4.8 Regression] 445.gobmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53062 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 ---

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug fortran/53876] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with class array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug other/53923] [4.8 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/54144] [4.6 Regression] With -std=c++0x certain incorrect arguments to map.insert cause gcc crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54144 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4

[Bug tree-optimization/54153] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark IDEA 6% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54153 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/54224] [4.8 Regression] Bogus -Wunused-function warning with static function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/54228] [4.6 Regression] 22_locale/num_put/put/char/9780-2.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54228 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4

[Bug target/54252] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bad alignment code generated for Neon loads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 11:18:42 UTC --- Another fix is to include all system headers (and thus gmp.h) from system.h which always comes before includes of intl.h.

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 11:22:06 UTC --- Fails with a 4.1 host libstdc++, succeeds with a 4.6 host libstdc++.

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 11:23:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) For linux environment, libc's abort function is a rather complex function and trapa handler should do equivalent things to keep

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #4 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 12:04:59 UTC --- Tentative fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01046.html Don't have an old enough compiler to test it myself. Need help with testing.

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 12:43:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) For linux environment, libc's abort function is a rather complex function and trapa handler should do

[Bug c/54282] New: GCC generates incorrect code for the PDP-11 target when -Os or -O2 is specified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54282 Bug #: 54282 Summary: GCC generates incorrect code for the PDP-11 target when -Os or -O2 is specified Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4

[Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966 --- Comment #12 from Tom Tignor ttignor at us dot ibm.com 2012-08-16 12:59:39 UTC --- Hi Jakub, Can you tell me what gcc version has the fix? Read through 48306 and saw Fixed in 4.5+ but I have a colleague here who is able to reproduce on

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 --- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 13:00:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) How about small variation: Sounds reasonable to me.

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #5 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 13:28:27 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Thu Aug 16 13:28:13 2012 New Revision: 190444 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190444 Log: 2012-08-16 Diego

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/54283] New: [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 Bug #: 54283 Summary: [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 13:46:24 UTC --- It was triggered by revision 176549: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-07/msg00816.html But ICE is always there.

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 13:53:37 UTC --- Created attachment 28030 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28030 hacky patch

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #50 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 13:55:40 UTC --- On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:10 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: bitmap stats are confusing because they show

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #51 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2012-08-16 14:06:06 UTC --- On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #50 from stevenb.gcc at

[Bug target/54284] New: -mabi=ieeelongdouble problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54284 Bug #: 54284 Summary: -mabi=ieeelongdouble problems Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #52 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 14:27:59 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 16 14:27:51 2012 New Revision: 190445 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190445 Log: 2012-08-16 Richard

[Bug fortran/54285] New: [F03] Calling a PPC with proc-ptr result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54285 Bug #: 54285 Summary: [F03] Calling a PPC with proc-ptr result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-08-16 14:45:03 UTC --- I see. Jonathan, I guess a reduced testcase not including anything would be very useful anyway (even if the ICE is very old)

[Bug c++/53839] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:6391

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53839 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 14:58:53 UTC --- I'll see what I can do.

[Bug fortran/54286] New: [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 Bug #: 54286 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 15:29:24 UTC --- Maybe related that we don't build a host libstdc++-v3 but only a target one: target_modules = { module= libstdc++-v3; bootstrap=true;

[Bug middle-end/54287] New: -finstrument-functions-exclude-function-list ignores class/namespace scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54287 Bug #: 54287 Summary: -finstrument-functions-exclude-function-list ignores class/namespace scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status:

[Bug c/54282] GCC generates incorrect code for the PDP-11 target when -Os or -O2 is specified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54282 Jordi Guillaumes Pons jguillaumes at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54288] New: Wrong sign compiled at run-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54288 Bug #: 54288 Summary: Wrong sign compiled at run-time Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug c++/54288] Wrong sign compiled at run-time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54288 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 18:24:30 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Thu Aug 16 18:24:22 2012 New Revision: 190449 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190449 Log: 2012-08-16 Diego

[Bug libstdc++/54289] New: setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 Bug #: 54289 Summary: setjmp isn't included into std namespace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/54281] [4.8 Regression] Fails to bootstrap with --disable-nls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54281 --- Comment #9 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 18:42:48 UTC --- New proposed patch. Needs testing with a 4.1 compiler. I couldn't build my own (fails to build). http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01090.html

[Bug c++/54197] [4.7/4.8 regression] Lifetime of reference not properly extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54197 --- Comment #3 from Ollie Wild aaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 18:44:01 UTC --- Author: aaw Date: Thu Aug 16 18:43:52 2012 New Revision: 190450 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190450 Log: Fix some cases where lifetimes of

[Bug c++/54197] [4.7/4.8 regression] Lifetime of reference not properly extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54197 --- Comment #4 from Ollie Wild aaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 18:46:42 UTC --- Fix submitted to the google/gcc-4_7 branch. Still waiting on maintainer approval for the trunk and gcc-4_7-branches.

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 --- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-08-16 19:11:01 UTC --- I think it's valid, CC'ing Dodji for confirmation. I agree this is a bug. I am looking into it.

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-08-16 19:38:16 UTC --- The problem seems still to exist in gcc 4.8.0 20120729 (experimental). Just to be sure that this is not due to a badly formed error description

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry dmitriy-hshg at mail dot ru 2012-08-16 19:43:15 UTC --- Sorry, but I think standard declares that all function should be in std.

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-08-16 19:46:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Sorry, but I think standard declares that all function should be in std. No. 17.6.1.2 [headers] only says so for

[Bug target/54290] New: gcc 4.4/4.5/4.6 produces wrong code on sparc with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54290 Bug #: 54290 Summary: gcc 4.4/4.5/4.6 produces wrong code on sparc with -O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry dmitriy-hshg at mail dot ru 2012-08-16 19:49:27 UTC --- I think standard of C std libs declares setjmp as a function. So, it should be function. Some code: __BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD typedef struct __jmp_buf_tag

[Bug target/54290] gcc 4.4/4.5/4.6 produces wrong code on sparc with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54290 --- Comment #1 from Erik Volk eriksnga at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 19:51:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28032 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28032 preprocessed test case

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-08-16 19:51:54 UTC --- Nothing changes, because the C++ standard says that macros which can be implemented as functions in C must be actual macros in C++ (and setjmp is

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-08-16 19:54:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) I think standard of C std libs declares setjmp as a function. So, it should be function. I'm not looking at any code,

[Bug libstdc++/54289] setjmp isn't included into std namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54289 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry dmitriy-hshg at mail dot ru 2012-08-16 19:55:57 UTC --- C standard: The header setjmp.h defines the macro setjmp, and declares one function and one type, for bypassing the normal function call and return discipline.

[Bug fortran/54285] [F03] Calling a PPC with proc-ptr result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54285 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 20:33:22 UTC --- The following patch fixes the error message in comment 0: Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c === ---

[Bug target/54272] [SH] Add support for addv / subv instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272 Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/54291] New: why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 Bug #: 54291 Summary: why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #1 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 21:04:28 UTC --- Created attachment 28034 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28034 additional files to source asked

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #2 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 21:06:51 UTC --- to THE source

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #3 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 21:09:24 UTC --- Created attachment 28035 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28035 object file to the source

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #4 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 21:11:38 UTC --- Created attachment 28036 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28036 assembler source file

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28034|0 |1

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 --- Comment #6 from Denis Kolesnik lirex.software at gmail dot com 2012-08-16 21:18:32 UTC --- I know it could be because if accounts values are changed they are sorted in reverse order(last changed), but my SQL request requests in strict order

[Bug bootstrap/54292] New: Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54292 Bug #: 54292 Summary: Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/54292] Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54292 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 21:49:53 UTC --- Created attachment 28038 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28038 configure log

[Bug bootstrap/54292] [4.8 Regression] Errors due to conflicting strsignal headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54292 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug middle-end/54261] reverse sync/atomic operators when only sync_compare_and_swap_optab libfuncs implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54261 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 22:03:39 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Thu Aug 16 22:03:33 2012 New Revision: 190454 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190454 Log: PR middle-end/54261 *

[Bug middle-end/54261] reverse sync/atomic operators when only sync_compare_and_swap_optab libfuncs implemented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54261 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 22:05:37 UTC --- Author: hp Date: Thu Aug 16 22:05:32 2012 New Revision: 190455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190455 Log: PR middle-end/54261 *

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 --- Comment #5 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-08-16 22:18:36 UTC --- A candidate patch was sent to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg0.html.

[Bug libstdc++/54005] Use __atomic_always_lock_free in libstdc++ is_lock_free instead of __atomic_is_lock_free

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 22:23:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Actually, that's the way __atomic_is_lock_free() has always been implemented (even in 4.7). There's miscommunication here.

[Bug c++/54291] why the value of the variable CHAR SQL_from_account[3] of is changed if it should not be changed?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54291 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-08-16 22:26:11 UTC --- *** Bug 54291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

  1   2   >