[Bug tree-optimization/55281] [4.8 Regression] ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1217 (with Ofast, ok with O3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281 --- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-11-13 08:04:35 UTC --- confirmed fixed in gcc version 4.8.0 20121113 (experimental) [trunk revision 193471] (GCC)

[Bug bootstrap/55293] bootstrap failure: invalid conversion from 'char**' to 'const char**' [-fpermissive]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #20 from Adi adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-13 08:21:12 UTC --- Created attachment 28672 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28672 the error while building gcc the error while building gcc 4.7.2

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #21 from Adi adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-13 08:29:51 UTC --- I am trying to build gcc 4.7.2 in order to apply the patch you suggested. I did the following: -download the gcc 4.7.2 -unzip and untar to to the root

[Bug c++/55287] GCC crashes and asks to file bug report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287 --- Comment #4 from Gordon Cichon gordoncichon at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 08:33:01 UTC --- Why is GCC comsuming so much memory? The program has 6.4MB source code, it is a single function. All optimizations are turned off. And there is

[Bug target/54429] [SH] SImode values get ferried through FPUL and FP regs for -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 08:44:43 UTC --- I've tested this: Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c === --- gcc/config/sh/sh.c(revision

[Bug libstdc++/55308] New: /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freebsd10.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol __emutls_v._ThreadRuneLocale

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308 Bug #: 55308 Summary: /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freeb sd10.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol __emutls_v._ThreadRuneLocale

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/55293] bootstrap failure: invalid conversion from 'char**' to 'const char**' [-fpermissive]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 09:42:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) The end result of the long long experiment is that there is something wrong in gcc 4.7.2 that make it near impossible

[Bug c++/55287] GCC crashes and asks to file bug report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 09:44:26 UTC --- 6.4MB in a single function is the problem. The compiler has to process that entire function at once. And 2GB is not a great amount.

[Bug other/55309] New: gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 Bug #: 55309 Summary: gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/52650] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c * (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/55270] ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:823

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/55266] vector expansion: 36 movs for 4 adds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55266 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 10:23:03 UTC --- The first copy is PR 52436. The second copy has a patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00900.html The last copy would

[Bug middle-end/52285] [4.7/4.8 Regression] libgcrypt _gcry_burn_stack slowdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/52285] [4.7/4.8 Regression] libgcrypt _gcry_burn_stack slowdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 10:43:58 UTC --- I think (plus (frame) (const_int)) is likely not an issue (at least in the common case, could be only problem if eliminated into something that needs

[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug middle-end/43631] var-tracking inserts notes with non-NULL BLOCK_FOR_INSN in between basic blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 10:50:17 UTC --- Created attachment 28673 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28673 gcc48-pr43631.patch Is this what you meant? make check-gcc

[Bug fortran/55297] [4.8 Regression] type-bound operator clashes with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/50012] [4.6 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 11:27:39 UTC --- One problem is AM_PROG_LIBTOOL, which is the part of libtool. GCC autoconf doesn't use libtool since we have in-tree libtool. To use GCC autoconf, we need

[Bug c++/54091] internal compiler error in class method with many string objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54091 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug objc/55291] libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug c++/55287] GCC crashes and asks to file bug report

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 13:04:28 UTC --- Created attachment 28674 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28674 gcc48-pr54073.patch On x86_64-linux on SandyBridge CPU with -O3

[Bug other/55310] New: libsanitizer con't be complier use gcc on windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55310 Bug #: 55310 Summary: libsanitizer con't be complier use gcc on windows Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-13 13:23:28 UTC --- You can find these files in.. http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/branches/release_32/lib/interception/mach_override/ With this

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 13:54:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) You can find these files in..

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 14:02:48 UTC --- The patch in PR 33704 makes no changes to libstdc++ or to any GCC , so I have no idea why you are seeing C++ errors compiling c-lang.c. Something else

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-13 14:06:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) dyld: Symbol not found: _CFStringCreateCopy this is found in the CoreFoundation

[Bug target/54791] AIX-only: Constructors are not called in main program.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791 --- Comment #23 from Adi adivilceanu at yahoo dot com 2012-11-13 14:08:42 UTC --- I did not put the patch yet. This is just gcc 4.7.2 original sources. Why would they not compile?

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-13 14:10:36 UTC --- what you need is to have -framework CoreFoundation on the link line - and I guess the configury c. needs to arrange this. When compiled

[Bug c++/55311] New: Cannot specialize template parameter of type 'const char *const' in 'using' alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311 Bug #: 55311 Summary: Cannot specialize template parameter of type 'const char *const' in 'using' alias Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #33 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 14:17:03 UTC --- Can we limit (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y))) to (plus:DI (zero_extend:DI (FOO:SI)) (const_int Y))

[Bug other/55312] New: libbacktrace doesn't honor --disable-werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312 Bug #: 55312 Summary: libbacktrace doesn't honor --disable-werror Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55253] [4.8 Regression] Revision 193298 miscompiles sqlite with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at

[Bug tree-optimization/55305] invalid aggregate constprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55305 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-13 14:29:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) what you need is to have -framework CoreFoundation on the link line - and I guess the configury c. needs to

[Bug debug/55094] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55253] [4.8 Regression] Revision 193298 miscompiles sqlite with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 14:31:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28675 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28675 Fix I am currently bootstrapping this fix. I'll submit it to the

[Bug target/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug other/55313] New: libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 Bug #: 55313 Summary: libsanitizer cannot be installed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-13 14:39:00 UTC --- Iain, This brings up the sticky situation of having to modify the Makefile.am file in libsanitizer/interception to add

[Bug objc/55291] libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55307] libgcc's __cpu_indicator_init does not check for avx correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55307 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/55299] missed optimization: ASR idiom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 --- Comment #9 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.artem at mailcity dot com 2012-11-13 15:06:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) The attached proof of concept patch attempts to just restore the 4.6 and earlier behavior by allowing in all

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 15:13:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) The attached proof of concept patch attempts to just restore the 4.6 and earlier behavior by allowing in all comparisons.

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 15:24:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Please see PR53346, from comment 14 onwards, especially H.J.'s comment: -quote- I was told that cmov wins if branch is

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka

[Bug c++/54466] [C++11] Recursive Type Alias, Member Function Pointer, Segmentation Fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466 --- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 16:07:50 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Tue Nov 13 16:07:39 2012 New Revision: 193479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193479 Log: PR c++/54466 -

[Bug c++/54466] [C++11] Recursive Type Alias, Member Function Pointer, Segmentation Fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 --- Comment #6 from Valery Weber valeryweber at hotmail dot com 2012-11-13 16:57:28 UTC --- Dear All I posted a comment on the openmp forum about the f2003 features. Complaining there may help, who knows? Valery

[Bug target/41993] [sh] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:399

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 16:59:44 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue Nov 13 16:59:37 2012 New Revision: 193480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193480 Log: PR target/41993 *

[Bug tree-optimization/55253] [4.8 Regression] Revision 193298 miscompiles sqlite with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Juno Krahn juno.krahn at nih dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juno.krahn

[Bug target/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #35 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 18:21:30 UTC --- This regression is triggered by revision 188008: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00038.html aka the un-sign-extension of sizetype constants.

[Bug other/55312] libbacktrace doesn't honor --disable-werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/19398] secondary reloads don't consider m alternatives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #36 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 18:35:42 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Nov 13 18:35:32 2012 New Revision: 193483 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193483 Log: Workaround

[Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] Runtime regression: polyhedron test rnflow degraded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 18:39:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) This shows that the file cptrf2_inl_1.f90 compiled with -ftree-loop-if-convert gives a slow executable without involving

[Bug middle-end/41115] Tree-vectorizer: VecCost tuning for X2: Without vectorization 30% faster

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41115 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/53342] [4.8 Regression] rnflow.f90 is ~5% slower after revision 187340

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 18:46:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Yeah. Is there any progress on this issue?

[Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] Runtime regression: polyhedron test rnflow degraded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-13 18:54:40 UTC --- Dup of PR53346 ? May be! Both PRs seem also related to pr54073.

[Bug tree-optimization/55253] [4.8 Regression] Revision 193298 miscompiles sqlite with -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 18:56:27 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue Nov 13 18:56:24 2012 New Revision: 193484 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193484 Log: 2012-11-13

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-13 19:50:20 UTC --- Created attachment 28676 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28676 hack to build asan support

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

functional yet as test cases compiled with... g++-fsf-4.8 -faddress-sanitizer -framework CoreFoundation hello.cc -lasan produce... # ./a.out mach_override: some instructions unknown! Need to update mach_override.c err = f801 ../../../../gcc-4.8-20121113/libsanitizer/interception

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

: 48 FAIL Matching: 48 FAIL Matching: 48 FAIL Matching: 48 FAIL Matching: 48 FAIL Matching: 48 FAIL Matching: 48 8d FAIL mach_override: some instructions unknown! Need to update mach_override.c overridePossible = false @299 err = f801 ../../../../gcc-4.8-20121113/libsanitizer

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-13 20:21:35 UTC --- The disasembled testcase that is choking on shows... test.o: file format mach-o-x86-64 Disassembly of section .text:

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-13 20:25:45 UTC --- Also note the comment in mach_override.c... #elif defined(__x86_64__) // TODO(glider): disassembling the 0x48, 0x89 sequences is trickier than

[Bug c/55299] missed optimization: ASR idiom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299 --- Comment #2 from olly at survex dot com 2012-11-13 20:40:06 UTC --- Interestingly clang (at least 3.0-6 from Debian testing) fails to optimise the same testcase but shifting by a constant. For that variant case clang generates

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

-after-free.c -lasan howarth% ./a.out mach_override: some instructions unknown! Need to update mach_override.c err = f801 ../../../../gcc-4.8-20121113/libsanitizer/interception/mach_override/mach_override.c:308 err = f801 ../../../../gcc-4.8-20121113/libsanitizer/interception/mach_override

[Bug other/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 Konstantin Serebryany konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/55312] libbacktrace doesn't honor --disable-werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 21:25:45 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Tue Nov 13 21:25:39 2012 New Revision: 193485 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193485 Log: PR

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 Konstantin Serebryany konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/55312] libbacktrace doesn't honor --disable-werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-11-13 21:31:08 UTC --- gcc uses -O2 -g by default for --disable-bootstrap. Also ,to be fair, if one uses a profiledbootstrapped gcc configured with

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28676|0 |1

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-13 22:14:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) Created attachment 28677 [details] prototype patch for adding darwin asan support Note that you need to run...

[Bug target/54429] [SH] SImode values get ferried through FPUL and FP regs for -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 22:25:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I've tested this: Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c === ---

[Bug fortran/55314] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 Bug #: 55314 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55315] New: comparing address to constant is folded in cse

-mainline-0-mipsisa32r2-sde-elf/fsf-mainline-0-mipsisa32r2-sde-elf.extras/host-libs-i686-pc-linux-gnu/usr --disable-libgomp --disable-libitm --enable-poison-system-directories --with-build-time-tools=install/mipsisa32r2-sde-elf/bin Thread model: single gcc version 4.8.0 20121113 (experimental) (GCC) ...

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 22:59:22 UTC --- Here's a tentative patch: Index: resolve.c === --- resolve.c (Revision 192894)

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-13 23:21:35 UTC --- prototype patch for adding darwin asan support Already updated;-( - x86_64-*-linux-* | i?86-*-linux-*) + x86_64-*-linux-* |

[Bug middle-end/52285] [4.7/4.8 Regression] libgcrypt _gcry_burn_stack slowdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285 --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 23:37:52 UTC --- Created attachment 28678 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28678 Gross hack (In reply to comment #11) If loops are still

[Bug middle-end/43631] var-tracking inserts notes with non-NULL BLOCK_FOR_INSN in between basic blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 23:38:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Created attachment 28673 [details] gcc48-pr43631.patch Is this what you meant? Yes, that's exactly what I meant,

[Bug target/55316] New: gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_linux.cc:70:3: error: #error Unsupported arch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55316 Bug #: 55316 Summary: gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_linux.cc:70:3: error: #error Unsupported arch Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |ada

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-14 00:02:16 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 14 00:02:12 2012 New Revision: 193491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193491 Log: Update

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55317] New: [i386-regression] just don't strip stdcall suffix in gcc

lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.8.0 20121113 (experimental) (GCC) Use --enable-stdcall-fixup to disable these warnings Use --disable-stdcall-fixup to disable these fixups /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/crtbegin.o:cygming-crtbegin.c:(.text+0x2f): undefined

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28677|0 |1

[Bug bootstrap/55289] darwin bootstrap fails due to missing libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289 --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-14 01:30:13 UTC --- Revised patch builds at r193494 after... cd libsanitizer autoconf -I. -I../config automake-1.11

[Bug c++/55318] New: Missing uninitialized warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55318 Bug #: 55318 Summary: Missing uninitialized warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/55319] New: Using -fwhole-program inhibits optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55319 Bug #: 55319 Summary: Using -fwhole-program inhibits optimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >