[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-11-16 09:11:36 UTC --- --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 01:06:20 UTC --- Does this still happen? It

[Bug rtl-optimization/55330] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15) on gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55330 David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314

[Bug c/55350] New: verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 Bug #: 55350 Summary: verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/52855] ARM: Internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52855 Steinar Midtskogen stemidts at cisco dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/55260] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_get_parm_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:263 with -O2 -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/54717] [4.8 Regression] Runtime regression: polyhedron test rnflow degraded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 10:37:30 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Nov 16 10:37:25 2012 New Revision: 193553 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193553 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-11-16 10:56:11 UTC --- is the problem similar to what described in PR55213? or here float mem[3*1024]; void sum() { float * a=mem; const float *

[Bug tree-optimization/55350] [4.8 Regression] verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 11:40:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 16 11:40:39 2012 New Revision: 193554 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193554 Log: PR

[Bug fortran/55297] [4.8 Regression] type-bound operator clashes with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/55351] New: can't build libgcc for -m5-compact variant in SH64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55351 Bug #: 55351 Summary: can't build libgcc for -m5-compact variant in SH64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/55333] libsanitizer StackTrace::FastUnwindStack wrong x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55333 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 12:02:33 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Nov 16 12:02:29 2012 New Revision: 193557 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193557 Log: Define/use

[Bug other/55333] libsanitizer StackTrace::FastUnwindStack wrong x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55333 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/41951] [OOP] Not diagnosing ambiguous operators (TB vs. INTERFACE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951 --- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 12:04:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Comment 12 is fixed with r189022, but comment 11 is still accepted without error. One way to reject the

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug fortran/41951] [OOP] Not diagnosing ambiguous operators (TB vs. INTERFACE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 12:33:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) One way to reject the abstract case in comment 11, would be to just do the checking, but not add the procedure to the operator list:

[Bug c++/54875] Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875 --- Comment #3 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-11-16 12:57:37 UTC --- I candidate patchlet has been submitted for this at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01375.html.

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 13:19:51 UTC --- The C testcase is simiar - in the mgrid case we are probably able to derrive useful loop bounds now and the dependency analysis could use them (but

[Bug tree-optimization/54497] [4.8 Regression] Revision 190015 causes 22% degradation on 172.mgrid on PowerPC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54497 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 13:29:05 UTC --- Ah, on the #c5 testcase the problem seems to be const float * vs. float *, /* If the references do not access the same object, we do not know

[Bug fortran/55352] New: Erroneous gfortran warning of unused module variable when variable is only used in namelist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55352 Bug #: 55352 Summary: Erroneous gfortran warning of unused module variable when variable is only used in namelist Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/55352] Erroneous gfortran warning of unused module variable when variable is only used in namelist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55352 --- Comment #1 from AstroFloyd AstroFloyd at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 13:43:25 UTC --- Created attachment 28710 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28710 Verbose output from compilation of example source file

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-11-16 13:46:13 UTC --- actually looking into the generated code I do not see any trace of runtime check even in presence of const c++ -O3

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 13:55:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) actually looking into the generated code I do not see any trace of runtime check even in presence of const The

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #12 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2012-11-16 13:58:33 UTC --- so a better c case is float * mem; void sumN(int n) { float * a=mem; /*const*/ float * b=mem+n; /*const*/ float * c=mem+2*n;

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug c++/55338] Incorrectly reported error in type name hiding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55338 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-16 14:15:34 UTC --- See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-11/msg00241.html Daniel, do you agree?

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 14:17:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) so a better c case is float * mem; void sumN(int n) { float * a=mem; /*const*/ float * b=mem+n; /*const*/

[Bug c++/55337] [4.8 Regression] ICE tree check: expected sizeof_expr, have alignof_expr in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:2608

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55337 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 14:33:48 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 16 14:33:44 2012 New Revision: 193558 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193558 Log: PR c++/55337

[Bug c++/55337] [4.8 Regression] ICE tree check: expected sizeof_expr, have alignof_expr in cp_tree_equal, at cp/tree.c:2608

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55337 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #42 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-16 14:42:33 UTC --- Fatigue now gets all inlining with -O3 -fwhole-program, with -O3 it gets only half of inlining because jump functions are not able to track

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8 Regression] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54073] [4.7 Regression] SciMark Monte Carlo test performance has seriously decreased in recent GCC releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7

[Bug c++/55338] Incorrectly reported error in type name hiding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55338 --- Comment #2 from Piotr Wyderski piotr.wyderski at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 15:06:45 UTC --- IMO this case is not covered by the linked paragraph, so please wait and let me create a thread on compl.lang.c++.moderated and then proceed

[Bug c++/54875] Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 15:20:11 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Fri Nov 16 15:20:03 2012 New Revision: 193562 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193562 Log: PR c++/54875 -

[Bug c++/54875] Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 15:38:42 UTC --- BTW, it works for me with --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --prefix=/usr/gcc-4.8.0 --with-local-prefix=/usr/local

[Bug fortran/55345] ICE with abstract interface type with use-renamed local names

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55345 --- Comment #2 from Juno Krahn juno.krahn at nih dot gov 2012-11-16 15:56:24 UTC --- Abstract interfaces and rename aliasing are both seldom used, plus there is a work-around, so I agree that there is no need for back porting.

[Bug middle-end/53024] Support vector_size that is not a power of 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53024 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end

[Bug tree-optimization/55260] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_get_parm_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:263 with -O2 -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/55352] Erroneous gfortran warning of unused module variable when variable is only used in namelist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55352 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/55330] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15) on gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55330 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 16:32:08 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Nov 16 16:32:02 2012 New Revision: 193567 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193567 Log:

[Bug rtl-optimization/55330] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15) on gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55330 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/55353] New: [asan] the flag for asan should match the one used in clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55353 Bug #: 55353 Summary: [asan] the flag for asan should match the one used in clang Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug fortran/55297] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] type-bound operator clashes with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 17:02:07 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Fri Nov 16 17:02:02 2012 New Revision: 193568 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193568 Log: 2012-11-16 Janus Weil

[Bug other/55354] New: [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 Bug #: 55354 Summary: [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.8.0

[Bug c++/55355] New: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6415

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355 Bug #: 55355 Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6415 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com 2012-11-16 17:20:43 UTC --- Not much better performance. Sole -fPIE vs -fPIC gives us 20% speedup on real programs. Indirect call will add another 10%.

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55355] internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6415

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355 --- Comment #1 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-16 17:23:11 UTC --- Oops: s/3.4.6/4.6.3/ on all above. All references to gcc 3.4.6 should actually be gcc 4.6.3. I'm apparently dyslexic or something today.

[Bug c++/55338] Incorrectly reported error in type name hiding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55338 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 17:27:50 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-11/msg00259.html Covers why this still invalid code. See also 13935.

[Bug c++/55355] internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6415

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-16 17:30:55 UTC --- I can't reproduce this on x86_64-linux, neither -m64 nor -m32. Tried 4.6.3, current 4_6-branch, 4_7-branch and mainline. Somebody can?

[Bug middle-end/55078] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr46154.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 17:32:50 UTC --- Martin, any news here?

[Bug c++/55338] Incorrectly reported error in type name hiding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55338 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 --- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 17:42:26 UTC --- /* Now merge each file. */ for (gi_ptr = gcov_list; gi_ptr; gi_ptr = gi_ptr-next) { // Open existing gcda file for gi_ptr //

[Bug target/55339] C++ code compiled with -O2 on Linux ppc hangs in runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55339 --- Comment #4 from anton.katilin at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 17:44:16 UTC --- Why did you do that? We copied the configuration of gcc 4.1.2 available on the system (Yellow Dog Linux) out of the box. It had been configured with

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING

[Bug c++/55355] internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6415

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355 --- Comment #3 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-16 17:50:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I can't reproduce this on x86_64-linux, neither -m64 nor -m32. Tried 4.6.3, current 4_6-branch, 4_7-branch and mainline.

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 --- Comment #33 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 18:00:54 UTC --- And at -O3 the testcase does not look really good indeed bb 7: # cstore_51 = PHI 0(5), 2147483647(6) # prephitmp_82 = PHI 1073741823(5),

[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 --- Comment #28 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-11-16 18:03:08 UTC --- On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:42 AM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 18:14:02 UTC --- Tom, do you have any idea what's going on in comment 6 and comment 8 of this bug?

[Bug fortran/55356] New: ICE with TRANSFER of C_NULL_PTR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55356 Bug #: 55356 Summary: ICE with TRANSFER of C_NULL_PTR Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/55357] New: -Wshadow warns about lambda function parameters matching variables in outer scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55357 Bug #: 55357 Summary: -Wshadow warns about lambda function parameters matching variables in outer scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug fortran/55297] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] type-bound operator clashes with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53024] Support vector_size that is not a power of 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53024 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 18:18:16 UTC --- I don't think we can ever support vector size of non power 2 size.

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 18:28:30 UTC --- Created attachment 28712 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28712 assign.c Assignment extracted into a self-contained testcase, does

[Bug other/55358] New: Valgrind errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55358 Bug #: 55358 Summary: Valgrind errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 --- Comment #29 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-11-16 18:57:41 UTC --- I'm confused - that is essentially what it is doing today (although comparing against the first merged file instead of the last merged file). It isn't

[Bug middle-end/55359] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg accessing an unaligned subvector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55359 Bug #: 55359 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg accessing an unaligned subvector Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-11-16 19:36:26 UTC --- I'm not sure if it's related, but with gcc built with clang's -fsanitize=address I get: markus@x4 ~ %

[Bug middle-end/53024] Support vector_size that is not a power of 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53024 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 20:03:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) I don't think we can ever support vector size of non power 2 size. I don't think we *will* ever support them (too much work,

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Serebryany konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 20:28:34 UTC --- You have been warned (especially about tsan performance. tsan run-time heavily depends on TLS, and TLS is much slower with -fPIC

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #12 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 20:46:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Tom, do you have any idea what's going on in comment 6 and comment 8 of this bug? Not offhand. If you send me the failing

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 20:46:35 UTC --- For TLS, you can just use -ftls-model=initial-exec or __attribute__((tls_model (initial-exec))). libasan from what I can see doesn't use TLS at all, and

[Bug rtl-optimization/55360] New: [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack needlessly writes to and reads from memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55360 Bug #: 55360 Summary: [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack needlessly writes to and reads from memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 --- Comment #6 from Konstantin Serebryany konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 20:54:40 UTC --- Answering my own question: we can get static linking with -Wl,-Bstatic -lasan -Wl,-Bdynamic -ldl -lpthread For TLS, you

[Bug fortran/55352] Erroneous gfortran warning of unused module variable when variable is only used in namelist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55352 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 21:43:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I guess we should either set attr.referenced in gfc_match_namelist (match.c), or check for attr.in_namelist in generate_local_decl

[Bug tree-optimization/55329] [4.8 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:487 with -O -fno-guess-branch-probability -fnon-call-exceptions --param=early-inlining-insns=111

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55329 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 22:05:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 16 22:05:32 2012 New Revision: 193577 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193577 Log: PR

[Bug c++/55361] New: Access control in templates only happens when instantiating a method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361 Bug #: 55361 Summary: Access control in templates only happens when instantiating a method Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug c++/55361] Access control in templates only happens when instantiating a method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 22:32:03 UTC --- The Comeau C/C++ online tester does not error out on this testcase.

[Bug c++/55361] Access control in templates only happens when instantiating a method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 22:38:47 UTC --- I don't think this is a gcc bug as access control is always done only at template-instantiation time.

[Bug target/54342] OImode is used for _m256 types when using unions in a function call.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54342 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target

[Bug target/53101] Recognize casts to sub-vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 23:03:47 UTC --- Created attachment 28713 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28713 Tweak on the patch of PR48037 This is a slight extension of

[Bug c++/55361] Access control in templates only happens when instantiating a method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-16 23:06:09 UTC --- Likewise EDG as used by Intel. clang errors out. From the user point of view, to make debugging easier, the earlier errors are produced the

[Bug rtl-optimization/55360] [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack needlessly writes to and reads from memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55360 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 23:46:25 UTC --- Is this related to PR 28831?

[Bug c++/55361] Access control in templates only happens when instantiating a method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17 00:19:18 UTC --- unless this is recategorised as a diagnostic enhancement request this is clearly invalid, the compiler is not required to give an error for this code

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr cxx11 fails on some platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at