[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #17 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ygribov Date: Mon Nov 18 08:03:16 2013 New Revision: 204934 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204934root=gccview=rev Log: libsanitizer: 2013-11-18 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com

[Bug libstdc++/59167] New: Add a specialization for std::hash__gnu_debug::string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59167 Bug ID: 59167 Summary: Add a specialization for std::hash__gnu_debug::string Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #18 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Created attachment 31233 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31233action=edit Libubsan -fno-rtti patch (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) See my

[Bug target/59142] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142 Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm

[Bug libfortran/51828] libgfortran build warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Mon Nov 18 09:27:11 2013 New Revision: 204940 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204940root=gccview=rev Log: PR libfortran/51828 *

[Bug libfortran/51828] libgfortran build warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/59168] New: Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 Bug ID: 59168 Summary: Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 31234 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31234action=edit Bug code

[Bug c++/59165] gcc looks up begin(), end() for for-range loops for ints in namespace std

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/59165] gcc looks up begin(), end() for for-range loops for ints in namespace std

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to thakis from comment #0) This compiles, but shouldn't: You add declarations to namespace std which is undefined behaviour, so any result is valid. The DR looks wrong to

[Bug rtl-optimization/59163] program compiled with g++ -O3 segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59165] gcc looks up begin(), end() for for-range loops for ints in namespace std

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think I remember the rationale now: std::begin and std::end only work if c.begin() and c.end() xist, in which case range-based for will use those members directly anyway.

[Bug tree-optimization/59164] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ice: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘integer_cst’ in get_var_info, at tree-into-ssa.c:380

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/59152] [4.9 Regression] ICE: loop 2's latch does not have an edge to its header with -fopenmp -fipa-pure-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug libstdc++/58038] std::this_thread::sleep_until can cause inifinite sleep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58038 --- Comment #5 from Mario Bielert mario.biel...@tu-dresden.de --- Hello Jonathan, I wonder whether this bug is solved or not, as you already posted in July a posible solution? Best Regards, Mario

[Bug rtl-optimization/59166] [4.9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5901 on valid code (at -O1 and above with -g enabled)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/59164] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ice: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘integer_cst’ in get_var_info, at tree-into-ssa.c:380

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/59163] [4.8/4.9 Regression] program compiled with g++ -O3 segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3

[Bug libstdc++/58038] std::this_thread::sleep_until can cause inifinite sleep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58038 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's not fixed yet, sorry

[Bug c/59159] Need opaque pass-through as optimization barrier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/59083] -fisolate-erroneous-paths produces illegal instruction with enabled -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083 --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf octoploid at yandex dot com --- I've tested this further on my Gentoo box and it turned out the many nontrivial packages that I've compiled failed with trap invalid opcode. From a QOI perspective this is a

[Bug fortran/59146] Segfault when ommiting '' in 'bind (C) ' procedure call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146 Jean-Charles Papin jean-charles.pa...@ens-cachan.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug c/59159] Need opaque pass-through as optimization barrier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Or have a pass that automates your asm() barrier instrumentation for all values that are life across a FENV affecting call.

[Bug target/59157] +f constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|x86_64-*-*,

[Bug inline-asm/59155] ICE: in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1473

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/59154] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug middle-end/59152] [4.9 Regression] ICE: loop 2's latch does not have an edge to its header with -fopenmp -fipa-pure-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hm, -O0 and loops. IPA opts are not really supposed to run at -O0. But the issue here seems to be that this loop has multiple latches but has -latch != NULL.

[Bug c/59169] New: symbol mismatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59169 Bug ID: 59169 Summary: symbol mismatch Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/59149] diagnose_tm_1 calls flags_from_decl_or_type on an ADDR_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Agreed - the code should have a gcc_unreachable () else.

[Bug debug/59170] New: pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170 Bug ID: 59170 Summary: pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/59169] symbol mismatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59169 --- Comment #1 from Chandra sekhar r rcs.raja at gmail dot com --- Full text of error : /usr/bin/ld: sslssThreadtltm_: TLS definition in libportal.so section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in libclntsh.so section .bss libclntsh.so: could

[Bug debug/59171] New: pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 Bug ID: 59171 Summary: pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/59154] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c/59159] Need opaque pass-through as optimization barrier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: I wonder whether a very early pass splitting functions at FENV clobber points and preventing

[Bug c++/59173] New: Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 Bug ID: 59173 Summary: Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug debug/59170] pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170 Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/59157] +f constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- long double f(long double x){ asm volatile(:+mf(x)); +t(x) should be used here.

[Bug target/59157] +f constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57517] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in eliminate_temp_copies, at tree-predcom.c:1913

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok, so we are having a combined chain where the combination is in a conditional path. Reduced testcase: SUBROUTINE cal_helicity (uh, ph, phb, wavg, ims, ime, its, ite) INTEGER,

[Bug c++/59173] Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for the report, John. I'll fix the library parts (assuming the corrected versions still compile with G++)

[Bug c++/59173] Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- It does, AFAICS.

[Bug c++/53473] [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.1,

[Bug tree-optimization/57517] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in eliminate_temp_copies, at tree-predcom.c:1913

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rakdver at gcc

[Bug target/59157] +f constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) long double f(long double x){ asm volatile(:+mf(x)); +t(x) should be used here. That's not really the same thing. The idea is that

[Bug middle-end/58742] [4.7/4.8 Regression] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/58653] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/58794] [4.8 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:455 on x86_64-linux-gnu (at -O1, -O2, and -O3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/59047] [4.9 Regression] wrong code for bitfields at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59047 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/58143] [4.8 regression] wrong code at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58143 --- Comment #32 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug middle-end/58742] [4.7/4.8 Regression] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/58653] [4.7 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.3

[Bug tree-optimization/58143] [4.8 regression] wrong code at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58143 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/58794] [4.8 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:455 on x86_64-linux-gnu (at -O1, -O2, and -O3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/58742] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug middle-end/59125] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:25:05 2013 New Revision: 204966 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204966root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug middle-end/59125] [4.8 Regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8/4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:25:05 2013 New Revision: 204966 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204966root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c++/53473] [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53473] [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 18 15:26:45 2013 New Revision: 204967 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204967root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Paolo Carlini

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0

[Bug c++/59085] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59085 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31236 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31236action=edit autoreduced testcase autoreduced (may be now invalid)

[Bug middle-end/58742] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW ---

[Bug middle-end/58742] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.3 |---

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com --- Is the line /* FIXME: This test has been xfailed until reductions are fixed. */ still relevant? I don't see any xfail in the source. The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to gcc-patches with your fix as well as removing the FIXME note? Is the use of stdlib.h OK for other targets?

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com --- On 11/18/13 09:02, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- The

[Bug target/59174] New: [avr] Suboptimal multiplication when indexing an array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59174 Bug ID: 59174 Summary: [avr] Suboptimal multiplication when indexing an array Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not a maintainer for this piece of code. Well, the test is yours. Who should I CC besides Iain Sandoe and Mike Stump?

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com --- On 11/18/13 09:45, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- You

[Bug c++/56869] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59096] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with template attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59096 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious. That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch on, say...Linux.

[Bug c++/59080] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with array of auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious. That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch on, say...Linux. I'll

[Bug c++/58701] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 58824, which changed state. Bug 58824 Summary: Lambda trigger internal compiler error http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 58824, which changed state. Bug 58824 Summary: Lambda trigger internal compiler error http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/58824] Lambda trigger internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- I'll check it out on Linux. Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed expected).

[Bug c++/58761] ICE with a lambda capturing this in a NSDMI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58761 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/59175] New: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-2.c fails with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175 Bug ID: 59175 Summary: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-2.c fails with -m32 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/59176] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed

case: Run as g++ -O3 -c test24.ii The attached file fails on x86-64-gnu-linux with GCC 4.9.0 20131118 (r204944). $ g++ -O2 -c test24.ii $ g++ -O3 -c test24.ii ... test24.ii:19:27: error: edge points to wrong declaration: ... test24.ii:19:27: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed

[Bug middle-end/59176] [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 31238 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31238action=edit Full output of g++ -c -O3 test24.ii

[Bug rtl-optimization/59019] [4.9 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-rgn.c:3561

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59019 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) I'll check it out on Linux. Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed expected). no difference in

[Bug libstdc++/59177] New: steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 Bug ID: 59177 Summary: steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/59177] steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Patch submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02098.html.

[Bug testsuite/59043] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: (gcc|++).dg/pubtypes* scan-assembler long.*Length of Public Type Names Info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59043 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Patch submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02105.html.

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE

[Bug libstdc++/59177] steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just install glibc 2.17 or later if you care about the speed, otherwise it is fixing much more important problem that the clocks had ABI incompatible settings depending on common

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Patch installed. Thanks.

[Bug c/59178] New: Stack corruption on register save/restore when using frame pointer on pdp-11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59178 Bug ID: 59178 Summary: Stack corruption on register save/restore when using frame pointer on pdp-11 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/59178] Stack corruption on register save/restore when using frame pointer on pdp-11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59178 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target

[Bug debug/37132] Debug: No DW_TAG_namelist emitted for NAMELISTS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-11/msg00060.html DWARF question asked (accessrequires subscription)

[Bug libstdc++/59177] steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 --- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu --- I can't get gcc trunk to build right now, but I just distcleaned and rebuilt the 4.8 branch truck on Fedora 19, which has glibc-2.17-19.fc19.x86_64. It defines

  1   2   >