https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61884
Bug ID: 61884
Summary: [4.10 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61085.C FAILs with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61085
--- Comment #10 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
Can you open a new bug for that?
Opened PR61884 for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Draft patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
@@ -591,4 +591,10 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_to_class (gfc_se *parmse, gfc_expr *e,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The draft patch does not fully work:
a) class._data = desc assignment is missing
tmp = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, tmp);
plus the moved gfc_add_modify works in the scalar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61071
--- Comment #1 from Krzysztof Kundzicz athantor+gccbugzilla at athi dot pl ---
Same with gcc 4.9.1 + gdb 7.7.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #56 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #55)
On July 17, 2014 6:13:14 PM CEST, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61885
Bug ID: 61885
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: in types_same_for_odr, at
ipa-devirt.c:383 with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Bug ID: 61886
Summary: [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] LTO breaks fread with
_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, it seems that at the point we merge in lto-symtab.c the cgraph nodes are
not yet populated. Neither of the two candidates are marked as alias.
So maybe the wrong thing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61884
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
Bug ID: 61887
Summary: vect.exp UNRESOLVED tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
--- Comment #1 from Marat Zakirov m.zakirov at samsung dot com ---
This issue is suitible for ARM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like a pretty old issue. E.g. on
void
foo (void)
{
__FILE__;
foo;
}
4.8 says:
r.c: In function ‘foo’:
r.c:4:1: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fails LTO bootstrap with
/abuild/rguenther/obj/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/abuild/rguenther/obj/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61885
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61884
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61846
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek at in dot waw.pl ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
C99 also has this requirement. But C89 did not.
The warnings are best effort anyway. So even if the standards did *not* say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Old value = 12 '\f'
New value = 16 '\020'
init_adjust_machine_modes () at insn-modes.c:1069
1066 /* config/i386/i386-modes.def:34 */
1067 s = TARGET_128BIT_LONG_DOUBLE ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61870
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61867
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61853
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61842
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fully preprocessed glibc fread stuff (reduced testcase drops main path
and a prototype for __fread_chk):
extern size_t __fread_chk (void *__restrict __ptr, size_t __ptrlen,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61888
Bug ID: 61888
Summary: Wrong results with SIZEOF and assumed-rank arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid, wrong-code
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Bug ID: 61889
Summary: [4.10 Regression] gcov-tool.c uses nftw, ftw.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 23 14:27:55 2014
New Revision: 212942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212942root=gccview=rev
Log:
Remove redundant tests
PR libgcc/61685
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55701
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Jul 23 16:02:15 2014
New Revision: 212948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212948root=gccview=rev
Log:
Revert r212893:
PR target/55701
* config/arm/arm.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33177
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33177action=edit
Proposed patch
I guess the problem is that error_mark_node is special cased in varasm to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61667
François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61890
Bug ID: 61890
Summary: [4.10 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C FAILs with
-O2 -fno-devirtualize-speculatively
-fno-guess-branch-probability
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42857
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Ayer bugs at mm dot beanwood.com ---
Any word on if this will be fixed in GCC? To summarize, GCC's current behavior
is wrong because:
* Underflowing after ignoring the requested number of bytes could block
forever,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
--- Comment #7 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net ---
So when you compose the svn comments, compose them from a cut and paste of sed
20q ChangeLog, exactly. In this case, you did this:
rs6000: fix for PR61396 (wide-int fallout)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61891
Bug ID: 61891
Summary: line-map.c: file command-line left but not entered
during `cabal install -p haskell-src-exts`
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
Bug ID: 61892
Summary: RVO not occurs with constructor with universal
reference arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
49 matches
Mail list logo
