https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63210
--- Comment #1 from Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com ---
Here is a workaround patch to show the point.
diff --git a/gcc/ira-color.c b/gcc/ira-color.c
index e2ea359..1573fb5 100644
--- a/gcc/ira-color.c
+++ b/gcc/ira-color.c
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63209
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63211
Bug ID: 63211
Summary: gcc.target/i386/avx2-*.c tests use broken type-punning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40135
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For reference I see for example
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpblendd128-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpblendd256-2.c execution test
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63212
Bug ID: 63212
Summary: [5 Regression] r214957 breaks bootstrap configured
with --enable-checking=release
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63204
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63212
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63213
--- Comment #1 from Oliver Stoeneberg oliverst at online dot de ---
Created attachment 33463
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33463action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63213
Bug ID: 63213
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50921
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63213
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Sep 9 10:15:46 2014
New Revision: 215046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215046root=gccview=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR 61749: Do not ICE in lane intrinsics when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #65 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Honza, does Jason's patch from comment 62 look good to you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62175
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61672
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 11:42:34 2014
New Revision: 215059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215059root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62079
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 11:42:34 2014
New Revision: 215059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215059root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62075
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 11:42:34 2014
New Revision: 215059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215059root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62079
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62175
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 11:42:34 2014
New Revision: 215059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215059root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61672
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 9 11:57:25 2014
New Revision: 215061
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215061root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61214
PR c++/62224
gcc/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 9 11:57:25 2014
New Revision: 215061
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215061root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61214
PR c++/62224
gcc/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 9 11:59:45 2014
New Revision: 215062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215062root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/62255
* pt.c (instantiate_decl):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62053
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
Jan, by any chance, do you have any progress on that? May be we should revert
the patch until the proper fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63194
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63190
--- Comment #3 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: yroux
Date: Tue Sep 9 12:40:52 2014
New Revision: 215069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215069root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Venkataramanan Kumar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63214
Bug ID: 63214
Summary: [5.0 regression] ICE with static __thread value member
in template class
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38354
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Adam Warner from comment #6)
Just to make sure I understand this correctly:
1. You won't confirm this bug because it violates the C standard.
You asked why it works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62075
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 13:17:51 2014
New Revision: 215073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215073root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61045
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 13:17:51 2014
New Revision: 215073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215073root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61010
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 13:17:51 2014
New Revision: 215073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215073root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61045
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61010
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62075
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63214
Tomohiro Kashiwada kikairoya at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61558
Tomohiro Kashiwada kikairoya at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kikairoya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61897
Tom Truscott trt at alumni dot duke.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62012
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
I checked that our benchmark is successfully vectorized with function inlining.
So this bug must be closed as fixed/resolved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62012
--- Comment #5 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
You can close this bug as fixed/resolved (see my comment).
Thanks.
Yuri.
2014-09-08 15:29 GMT+04:00 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.10.0 |5.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 62012, which changed state.
Bug 62012 Summary: Loop is not vectorized after function inlining (SCEV)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62012
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62012
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61452
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61452
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 9 14:45:57 2014
New Revision: 215081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215081root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #33 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue in comment 32 was introduced in revision 214177
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38354
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
This seems like an enhancement request to me. Initializers using a 64-bit
function address cast to 32-bit are outside the scope of my model of
constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Sep 9 18:49:08 2014
New Revision: 215091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215091root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-09 Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62211
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-m{soft,hard}-float for arm should be considered deprecated (we try to support
them by mapping them onto the -mfloat-abi option), and deliberately no-longer
document them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63195
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #38 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Created attachment 33464
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33464action=edit
Corrected dirent patch
Couple of things:
1) The version of Sanitizer included
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #17 from Chris Clayton chris2553 at googlemail dot com ---
I can confirm that with Jason's code changes (referenced in comment 15) to
gcc/cp/decl2.c and gcc/gimple-fold.c, the resultant compiler successfully
builds qt-creator-3.2.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63156
--- Comment #9 from Carrot carrot at google dot com ---
The original flag setting code is neither correct. Consider following
pre_modify expression:
(pre_modify (r1)// def1, use1
(plus (r1) // use2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56750
--- Comment #7 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
ping ... this is causing releases of binutils' gold to be statically linked,
and causing headaches for the gold testsuites.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #39 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #38)
2) You should report this bug upstream.
http://compiler-rt.llvm.org
On second thought, they probably won't accept it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38354
--- Comment #11 from Adam Warner adam at consulting dot net.nz ---
Thank you Joseph for clarifying in Comment 10 why this should be considered an
enhancement request. It would be non-trivial to change the model of what GNU C
considers a constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #8 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Sep 10 04:45:32 2014
New Revision: 215101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215101root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-10 Tony Wang tony.w...@arm.com
libstdc++-v3/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #19 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Sep 10 05:02:02 2014
New Revision: 215102
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215102root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/60655
* dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #20 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Sep 10 05:02:28 2014
New Revision: 215103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215103root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR debug/60655
* dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215
Bug ID: 63215
Summary: LTO causes symbols for builtin functions to be omitted
from object files
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
61 matches
Mail list logo