[Bug c++/80981] [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Clang and older versions of GCC do accept that. view-source:https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/porting_to.html#hypothetical-instantiation The error is entirely

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #36 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #35) > The workaround is to filter out -static-libgcc in configure.ac on Darwin but > to leave -static-libstdc++, so why is it still looking for the

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #37 from simon at pushface dot org --- Created attachment 41474 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41474=edit Patch to top-level configure.ac, configure

[Bug tree-optimization/80974] [8 Regression] wrong code (generated code hangs) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- During iteration 1 on some loop, we get Setting value number of i_10 to h_11 (changed) which becomes Setting value number of i_10 to i_10 (changed) in later iterations. But the call to

[Bug tree-optimization/80974] [8 Regression] wrong code (generated code hangs) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- The conditions and location are probably not right, but at least the testcase passes, so this gives an idea of where the problem is. --- tree-ssa-sccvn.c(revision 248859) +++ tree-ssa-sccvn.c(working

[Bug c++/80981] [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Thanks for the patch.

[Bug fortran/35339] Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Koenig --- Author: koenigni Date: Mon Jun 5 12:35:11 2017 New Revision: 248877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248877=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-05 Nicolas Koenig PR

[Bug lto/80717] LTO wrappers segfault if run with absolute path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80717 Anatol changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anatol.pomozov at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug sanitizer/80932] UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution: c1*(c2*v1-c3*v2)=>c1*c2*v1-c1*c3*v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Better testcase (C and C++): int x = 1; long int foo (void) { return ((long) (13801962912760474560ULL * x) - (long) (15334142073106273231ULL * x)) * -6; } int main () { foo (); return 0; }

[Bug sanitizer/80932] UBSAN: false positive as a result of distribution: c1*(c2*v1-c3*v2)=>c1*c2*v1-c1*c3*v2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Marek

[Bug c++/80981] [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/80945] Invalid code with allocatable character array in READ/WRITE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- If this patch is fixed, please remember to remove the extra check in frontend-passes.c (traverse_io_block). Just grep for 80945.

[Bug c++/80981] [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80979] New: ice in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979 Bug ID: 80979 Summary: ice in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2298 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug other/80803] libgo appears to be miscompiled on powerpc64le since r247497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803 --- Comment #25 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to boger from comment #17) > I run these tests after a build by first editing the > src/libgo/testsuite/gotest to set keep=true and trace=true. Then I go to my > bld directory: > > cd

[Bug c++/80981] [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/80979] ice in lookup_mark, at cp/tree.c:2298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ source code: namespace a class address { friend bool operator==(const address &, const address &} bool operator==(const address &, const address &; } class b { a::address

[Bug tree-optimization/80974] [8 Regression] wrong code (generated code hangs) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- scc_vn_restore_ssa_info is called at the end of PRE, but we would need some form of restoration after any iteration cycle at least (or maybe we shouldn't have modified the information for h_11, I don't know).

[Bug rtl-optimization/80474] [6 regression] ipa-cp wrongly adding LO(symbol) twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80474 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 41471 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41471=edit Tentative fix for 6 branch

[Bug c++/80981] New: [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 Bug ID: 80981 Summary: [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/80981] [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80981] [7/8 Regression] couldn't deduce template parameter for an obvious case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 41473 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41473=edit Original test-case Attaching original test-case, where I get: ../../v8/src/objects-body-descriptors.h: In static

[Bug c/80919] [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wall when printing address of size 0 array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80919 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE: |[7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug target/80970] [7 Regression] internal compiler error in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80970 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška

[Bug bootstrap/80978] [8 Regression] LTO/PGO bootstrap broken by r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Jun 5 09:31:32 2017 New Revision: 248873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248873=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-05 Janus Weil Backport from trunk

[Bug tree-optimization/80980] New: -Os generates larger code than -O1 because loop is not removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80980 Bug ID: 80980 Summary: -Os generates larger code than -O1 because loop is not removed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80947] Different visibility for the lambda and its capture list members with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80947 --- Comment #1 from Vlad Zolotarov --- Created attachment 41472 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41472=edit an ii value generated by g++-6

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The ICE has been fixed on (8-)trunk. Backports pending. (In reply to janus from comment #7) > However, we probably still need to deal with PPCs that have allocatable > function results. This is

[Bug other/32415] libgcc_s not found in library search path with --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32415 Dan Ibanez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daibane at sandia dot gov --- Comment #15

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm, they don't all fail on power6/7 (costmodel-pr37194.c for instance). I attached a dump from -fdump-tree-vect-details for one that does (power6).

[Bug target/80982] New: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 Bug ID: 80982 Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/80983] New: [ F03] memory leak when calling procedure-pointer component with allocatable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80983 Bug ID: 80983 Summary: [ F03] memory leak when calling procedure-pointer component with allocatable result Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/80983] [F03] memory leak when calling procedure-pointer component with allocatable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80983 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/70601] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Jun 5 14:43:01 2017 New Revision: 248878 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248878=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-05 Janus Weil PR fortran/70601

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-test/gcc/ /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33-big-array.c

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 41475 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41475=edit Dump from -fdump-tree-vect-details for test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-33-big-array.c

[Bug target/80982] gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-3-runnable.c fails starting with its introduction in r248846

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80982 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug libstdc++/80939] Various helper function templates in incorrectly marked constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80939 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jun 5 16:49:04 2017 New Revision: 248881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248881=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/80939 Remove unmeetable constexpr specifiers PR

[Bug other/80803] libgo appears to be miscompiled on powerpc64le since r247497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803 --- Comment #26 from Ian Lance Taylor --- This should let you run the test binary: cd TARGET/libgo make GOTESTFLAGS=--keep net/check cd gotest*/test LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../.libs ./a.out -test.short The test binary is simply a.out in the

[Bug fortran/80983] [F03] memory leak when calling procedure-pointer component with allocatable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80983 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80984] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with label/variable ambiguity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80984 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/62170] wrong quoting (and colors) for typedef diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62170 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00242.html

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- These started to fail on aarch64-*-* at the same time as powerpc.

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou --- > When I tried the workaround, I got > > /var/gcc/regression/trunk/10.7-gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc > -B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/10.7-gcc/build/./gcc/ > -B/vol/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2/bin/ >

[Bug bootstrap/80978] New: [8 Regression] LTO/PGO bootstrap broken by r248863

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80978 Bug ID: 80978 Summary: [8 Regression] LTO/PGO bootstrap broken by r248863 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/80970] [7 Regression] internal compiler error in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80970 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80971] [7/8 Regression] ICE with 'if constexpr' in template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80971 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80972] [7/8 Regression] ICE with alignas and __attribute__((packed))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80972 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80974] [8 Regression] wrong code (generated code hangs) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80974] [8 Regression] wrong code (generated code hangs) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Ah good, a testcase, thanks. Maybe we'll understand what was breaking spec now. Transformation happens during PRE.

[Bug target/80970] [7 Regression] internal compiler error in find_reloads, at reload.c:4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80970 --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Can't download source files: > You don't have permission to access /~glaubitz/cc2Vfl4Z.out.gz on this > server. Oops, sorry. That should be fixed

[Bug tree-optimization/80974] [8 Regression] wrong code (generated code hangs) at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80974 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- According to the previous dump (crited1): # RANGE [1, 9] NONZERO 15 h_11 = h_43 + 1; but when we call get_nonzero_bits on h_11 in PRE, we get 7 ???

[Bug tree-optimization/80894] [8 Regression] 456.hmmer in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80894 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- Hopefully the issue is the same as in PR 80974, which does have a testcase.

[Bug bootstrap/80897] gnat bootstrap broken on sparc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/80897] gnat bootstrap broken on sparc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897 --- Comment #2 from Anatoly Pugachev --- ... make[7]: Entering directory '/1/mator/gcc8/gcc/ada/rts' make[7]: 'a-assert.o' is up to date. /1/mator/gcc8/./gcc/xgcc -B/1/mator/gcc8/./gcc/ -B/1/gcc/sparc64-linux-gnu/bin/

[Bug c++/62207] [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'overload' in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62207 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Last

[Bug c++/80984] New: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with label/variable ambiguity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80984 Bug ID: 80984 Summary: [5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE with label/variable ambiguity Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79056] [7/8 Regression] [C++17] ICE with broken deduction guide / broken template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79056 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Last

[Bug target/80556] [8 Regression] bootstrap failure for Ada compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556 --- Comment #38 from Eric Botcazou --- > I’ve worked out a patch and bootstrapped (see attachment). The patch is > against the gcc-8-20170558 snapshot, would that be OK? I'm no Darwin specialist so I cannot really comment, but my understanding

[Bug c++/80593] [7 Regression] GCC 7, aligned_storage and “dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules”

--- Comment #10 from Daniel Black --- FYI I have tested from the gcc master (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20170605 (experimental)) and it doesn't identify the the following bit of rocksdb code as a warning where previously it did. So fixed for me on master. ./db/write_thread.h:227:78: error

[Bug c++/80985] New: -Wnoexcept-type should not produce a warning for inlined template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80985 Bug ID: 80985 Summary: -Wnoexcept-type should not produce a warning for inlined template functions Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: