[Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv

[Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- for try blocks, I do need the catch blocks so do it as the siblings. For catch blocks, the child will be type that is being caught as a DW_TAG_formal_parameter/DW_TAG_unspecified_parameters .

[Bug target/56009] Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This is IIRC the whole atexit vs __cxa_atexit issue.

[Bug other/57956] missing 'msgstr' section errors when building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57956 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, documentation Last

[Bug c/65007] __builtin_uaddll_overflow wrong *res declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65007 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/88642] Accepts ill-formed program with invalid scalar initialization syntax.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88642 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- We do warn: : In function 'main': :3:5: warning: braces around scalar initializer 3 | int x = { { 0 } } ; | ^~~ Maybe this should be a pedantic warning instead ... if

[Bug testsuite/114642] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/112980] 64-bit powerpc ELFv2 does not allow nops to be generated before function global entry point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112980 --- Comment #13 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Giuliano Belinassi from comment #12) > With your patch we have: > > > .LPFE0: > > ... > Which seems what is expected. Hi Giuliano, thanks for your time on testing it! Could you kindly help to

[Bug c/56335] Optimization assumes __attribute__((aligned(N))) always works.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56335 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/87795] Excessive alignment permitted for functions and labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87795 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug c/86885] gcc erroneously allows constructor/destructor attributes on nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.2 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/93537] gcc 9.2 takes a Segmentation Violation when attached file is compiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93537 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #2 from

[Bug modula2/114648] compiler by default does not handle C pre-processor file and line directives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114648 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:600bf396799a022e65938de572ad1a79a951b95a commit r14-9849-g600bf396799a022e65938de572ad1a79a951b95a Author: Gaius Mulley Date:

[Bug modula2/114648] compiler by default does not handle C pre-processor file and line directives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114648 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/114642] new test case gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-3.c from r14-6195-gb8cf266f4ca4ff fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114642 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > David posted a fix (see URL). Oh yes that should fix it for MIPS and RISCV too.

[Bug testsuite/114614] New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114614 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56009] Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/55139] __atomic store does not support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/86885] gcc erroneously allows constructor/destructor attributes on nested functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86885 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 57908 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57908=edit testcase

[Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/89624] HLE acquire/release bits in std::memory_order don't work with -fshort-enums or -fstrict-enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89624 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, Does this matter that much since HLE has been disabled on all cores?

[Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- So for space, on LP64 (and LLP64) hosts, there is a free 32bits in the BLOCK structure: ``` tree chain; unsigned block_num; location_t locus; // unsigned location_t end_locus; // unsigned tree

[Bug target/114639] [riscv] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.cc:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114639 --- Comment #7 from Li Pan --- Looks this commit from bisect acc22d56e140220e7dc6c138918cb6754b6d1c0b, will take a look into it.

[Bug middle-end/87535] multiple attribute assume_aligned interpreted inconsistently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87535 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||64236 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/88642] Accepts ill-formed program with invalid scalar initialization syntax.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88642 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- So this code is quiet old. There was an error back before r0-5028-g790e949032a94b (1993, change by RMS) and mailing lists don't exist that far back ...

[Bug target/114639] [riscv] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.cc:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114639 --- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong --- Definitely it is a regression: https://compiler-explorer.com/z/e68x5sT9h GCC 13.2 is ok, but GCC 14 ICE. I think you should bisect first.

[Bug libgomp/45025] Memory ordering issues with libgomp critical sections and __sync

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45025 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/88309] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception (in is_miss_rate_acceptable), target assigning alignent of 4 bits(!) to vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88309 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26eb5f8fd173e2425ae7505528fc426de4b7e34c commit r14-9850-g26eb5f8fd173e2425ae7505528fc426de4b7e34c Author: Kewen Lin Date: Mon Apr 8

[Bug testsuite/114614] New test case gcc.misc-tests/gcov-20.c from r14-9789-g08a52331803f66 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114614 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c97de682303b81c8886ac131fcfb3b122f2f1a6 commit r14-9851-g9c97de682303b81c8886ac131fcfb3b122f2f1a6 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Mon Apr

[Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > for try blocks, I do need the catch blocks so do it as the siblings. > For catch blocks, the child will be type that is being caught as a >

[Bug target/55966] __atomic_fetch_* generate wrong code for HLE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55966 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/57956] missing 'msgstr' section errors when building

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57956 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/58806] New attribute for functions that access memory only through their arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58806 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39436 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > for try blocks, I do need the catch blocks so do it as the siblings. > > For catch blocks, the child will be type

[Bug target/55947] non constant memory models lose HLE qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55947 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/114587] -mapxf should define a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114587 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18e94e04dae724c61cbc13ace85fa68f2deda900 commit r14-9852-g18e94e04dae724c61cbc13ace85fa68f2deda900 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Apr 8

[Bug c++/114480] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 --- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, douglas.boffey at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 > > --- Comment #25 from Douglas Boffey --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c++/114480] [12/13/14 Regression g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.4 Priority|P3

[Bug ada/114640] New: ICE on 'elsif' with complex function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640 Bug ID: 114640 Summary: ICE on 'elsif' with complex function call Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug c++/114480] [12/13/14 Regression] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #28 from

[Bug ada/114640] ICE on 'elsif' with complex function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114640 --- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org --- It turns out that the error does not occur if I change if First_Term = Invalid_Node_Access then -- Empty or all virtual return

[Bug tree-optimization/114061] GCC fails vectorization when using __builtin_prefetch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114061 Victor Do Nascimento changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |victorldn at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/113006] OpenMP 5 - lvalue parsing support for map/to/from clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113006 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/113359] [13/14 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64 and x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359 --- Comment #26 from Martin Jambor --- This should be fixed on master, I'll backport the fix in a few weeks to at least gcc-13 where it was reported.

[Bug target/114621] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- char a; __thread char b[0x8L]; int foo (void) { return b[0x7L]; } ICEs similarly with -O0 -fpie.

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 Nick Desaulniers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com ---

[Bug c++/114643] New: Call to a template function emitted but without the code for the template function itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114643 Bug ID: 114643 Summary: Call to a template function emitted but without the code for the template function itself Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/114643] Call to a template function emitted but without the code for the template function itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114643 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is a devirtualization issue ... Let me find the dup.

[Bug target/114621] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- While for the local exec we happily use something like movq%fs:0, %rax movabsq $b@tpoff+34359738367, %rdx addq%rdx, %rax movzbl (%rax), %eax we normally use

[Bug target/114639] [riscv] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.cc:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114639 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- /* If we didn't see a full return value copy, verify that there is a plausible reason for this. If some, but not all of the return register is likely spilled, we

[Bug c/53548] allow flexible array members in unions like zero-length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548 --- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Clang has accept this extension: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84428

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #74 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1162861439fd3c4b30fc3ccd49462e47e876f04a commit r14-9840-g1162861439fd3c4b30fc3ccd49462e47e876f04a Author: Martin Jambor Date:

[Bug ipa/113359] [13/14 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64 and x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359 --- Comment #25 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e3312a25a7b34d6e3f549273e1674c7114e4408 commit r14-9841-g1e3312a25a7b34d6e3f549273e1674c7114e4408 Author: Martin Jambor Date:

[Bug libstdc++/114519] [14 Regression] GCC 14 trunk fails to compile chrono with -fno-char8_t -std=gnu++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114519 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:feb6a2d3569095706170c9400e93add27a66e034 commit r14-9839-gfeb6a2d3569095706170c9400e93add27a66e034 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug ipa/113359] [13 Regression] LTO miscompilation of ceph on aarch64 and x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[13/14 Regression] LTO |[13 Regression] LTO

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #75 from Martin Jambor --- The above fixes the testcase from comment #58. I am not sure if any other testcases discussed here remain unresolved. I am also not sure to what extent we want to that patch of mine, I guess I'll

[Bug ipa/114643] Call to a template function emitted but without the code for the template function itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114643 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||62051 --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug fortran/114626] Very long time for compilation the attached program, depends on value of a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114626 --- Comment #2 from Arjen Markus --- Thanks for the explanation - that is clear enough.

[Bug gcov-profile/114599] [14 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_set_bit(bitmap_head*, int) (bitmap.cc:975) with -O2 -fcondition-coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114599 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener --- (t_initf) Read in prof_inparm namelist from: drv_in (shr_sys_abort) ERROR: (T_INITF) :: namelist read returns an error condition for prof_inparm (shr_sys_abort) WARNING: calling mpi_abort() and stopping

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 chenglulu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chenglulu at loongson dot cn --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to chenglulu from comment #23) > (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #22) > > The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : > > > >

[Bug rust/114629] rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629 Pierre-Emmanuel Patry changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pierre-emmanuel.patry@embec

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 57895 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57895=edit drv_in input file This is the complete input file.

[Bug c++/114619] [13/14 regression] ICE with -fno-elide-constructors in C++14 mode for non-constant initializer in array new since r13-3175-g6ffbf87ca66f4e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114619 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking, |

[Bug middle-end/114627] undefined behavior in tree-profile.cc while compiling gcc.misc-tests/gcov-18.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114627 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] undefined |undefined behavior in

[Bug libstdc++/114633] New: [14 Regression] A cross to rx fails to build in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114633 Bug ID: 114633 Summary: [14 Regression] A cross to rx fails to build in libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/114633] [14 Regression] A cross to rx fails to build in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||rx-elf Keywords|

[Bug ada/114065] gnat build with -D_TIME_BITS=64 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 fails on 32bit archs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Boulenguez --- Created attachment 57897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57897=edit rewrite commit 3/8 so that Duration'Size may be 32 Would version 4 of commit 3/8 be OK? It only modifies

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #72 from Sam James --- It's up to RMs of course but FWIW, the critical part of this for me is fixed now and it could be a P2 now if desired.

[Bug tree-optimization/114624] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97d5cd8740384dbce5a83080916388f80d8976dd commit r14-9829-g97d5cd8740384dbce5a83080916388f80d8976dd Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ipa/113907] [11/12/13/14 regression] ICU miscompiled on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #73 from Richard

[Bug c++/114480] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- Note we're using -Wl,--stack,12582912 when linking the GCC executables, I wonder if the reporter can verify the segfaulting executables have the correct stack size set?

[Bug ipa/114501] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE during modref with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114501 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|14.0|13.2.0 Priority|P1

[Bug ipa/114531] Feature proposal for an `-finline-functions-aggressive` compiler option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114531 Rama Malladi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rvmallad at amazon dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/113288] [i386] Missing #define for -mavx10.1-256 and -mavx10.1-512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113288 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libquadmath/114623] sqrtq and std::numeric_limits<__float128>::max()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114623 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rust/114629] rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- is that part of the language standard? I don't think we have to copy rustc easter eggs - in fact I'd report this as a bug to them.

[Bug target/112868] GCC passes -many to the assembler for --enable-checking=release builds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- No problems reported yet and we have several people testing on ppc w/ gcc 14.

[Bug c++/114634] Crash Issue Encountered in GCC Compilation of Template Code with Aligned Attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-08

[Bug target/114621] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- And find_group_name does ios = 0 do while (ios <= 0) read(unit, '(a)', iostat=ios, end=102) inrec ... inrec2 = to_lower(adjustl(inrec)) ! check for leading '&' if

[Bug target/114621] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/66862] OpenMP SIMD does not work (use SIMD instructions) on conditional code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66862 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/114622] memcmp -Wstringop-overread false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114622 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/114624] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 57896 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57896=edit Testcase It seems as if 'tabs' cause problems, e.g. for: profile_single_file= .true. where there are

[Bug c/114634] New: Crash Issue Encountered in GCC Compilation of Template Code with Aligned Attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114634 Bug ID: 114634 Summary: Crash Issue Encountered in GCC Compilation of Template Code with Aligned Attribute Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/114304] [13/14 Regression] libgfortran I/O – bogus "Semicolon not allowed as separator with DECIMAL='point'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 --- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 > > --- Comment #28 from Tobias Burnus --- > Created attachment 57896 > -->

[Bug tree-optimization/114624] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114624 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rust/114629] rust-ast-resolve-expr contains bloated code for funny_error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114629 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/114501] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE during modref with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114501 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug middle-end/114604] Ranger allocates from uninitialized bitmap_default_obstack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114604 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/114480] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 --- Comment #23 from Douglas Boffey --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22) > Note we're using -Wl,--stack,12582912 when linking the GCC executables, I > wonder > if the reporter can verify the segfaulting executables have the correct

[Bug c++/114480] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, douglas.boffey at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480 > > --- Comment #23 from Douglas Boffey --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/114644] New: wrong -Wrestrict on snprintf() of distinct struct array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114644 Bug ID: 114644 Summary: wrong -Wrestrict on snprintf() of distinct struct array members Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug libstdc++/114645] New: std::chrono::current_zone ignores $TZ on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114645 Bug ID: 114645 Summary: std::chrono::current_zone ignores $TZ on Linux Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/114634] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Crash Issue Encountered in GCC Compilation of Template Code with Aligned Attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114634 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.5.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/77882] [Aarch64] Add 'naked' function attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77882 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #14) > Adding a data point from > https://discourse.llvm.org/t/hand-written-in-assembly-in-libc-setjmp-longjmp/ > 73249/9. > > It's becoming a code portability

  1   2   3   >