[Bug c/114763] Wduplicated-branches just check last else if-else case?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114763 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c/114763] Wduplicated-branches just check last else if-else case?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114763 --- Comment #2 from hanwei (K) --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Note only the second case has if's 2 sides which are the same; > it is basically `a ? b : (c ? d : d)`. > > While the first case you have `a ? b : (c ? d : b)`

[Bug c/114763] Wduplicated-branches just check last else if-else case?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114763 --- Comment #3 from hanwei (K) --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Note only the second case has if's 2 sides which are the same; > it is basically `a ? b : (c ? d : d)`. > > While the first case you have `a ? b : (c ? d : b)`

[Bug c/114763] Wduplicated-branches just check last else if-else case?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/114753] from_chars aborts with -m32 -ftrapv when passed -9223372036854775808

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114753 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c152c9db3b5b9d43e12846fb7a44977c0b65fc2 commit r14-10012-g6c152c9db3b5b9d43e12846fb7a44977c0b65fc2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c/114763] New: Wduplicated-branches just check last else if-else case?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114763 Bug ID: 114763 Summary: Wduplicated-branches just check last else if-else case? Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/114755] wrong code with _BitInt() modulo at -O0 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114755 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82d6d385f9708fb6d5e2a2bacd003155cfc41c08 commit r14-10013-g82d6d385f9708fb6d5e2a2bacd003155cfc41c08 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/114753] from_chars aborts with -m32 -ftrapv when passed -9223372036854775808

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114753 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/114755] wrong code with _BitInt() modulo at -O0 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114755 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/114761] Ignored [[likely]] attribute with multiple if statements doing the same thing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114761 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-18 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/114749] [13 Regression] RISC-V rv64gcv ICE: in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114749 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114749 > > --- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong --- > Hi, Patrick. > > It seems that Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/114760] traling zero count detection failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114760 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I think it's also a missed canonicalization for x << 1 vs. x + x (and 2*x). unsigned a, b, c; void foo (unsigned x) { a = x << 1; b = x + x; c = 2 * x; } x + x gets folded to 2 * x before

<    1   2