http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
08:06:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 28922
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28922
gcc48-pr55643.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47961
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34426
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
08:57:24 UTC ---
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|TSAN crashes for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
09:59:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Any progress on this? Does the branch patch not work on the trunk?
Simply task of forward-porting and testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55645
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55645
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11 10:03:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
// possible syntax
void compute() {
for (int i=0;i!=1024;++i) {
if likely(a[i]b[i]) // very often
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:06:20 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 11 10:06:15 2012
New Revision: 194388
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194388
Log:
2012-12-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:07:23 UTC ---
That would be a bogus warning ... all uses of e are within FOR_EACH_EDGE.
Trying to reproduce.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:13:10 UTC ---
I am preparing a first patch, we of course need to verify the assertions in it
are true ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:19:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 11 10:19:21 2012
New Revision: 194389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194389
Log:
2012-12-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
--- Comment #1 from Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com 2012-12-11
10:25:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 28924
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28924
Reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44061
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:35:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 28925
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28925
patch I was not happy with
Old patch attached for reference.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55645
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:41:55 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 10:41:44 2012
New Revision: 194392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194392
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55615
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:42:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 10:41:44 2012
New Revision: 194392
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194392
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55627
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55645
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-12-11 10:43:21 UTC ---
sure use c[i]=std::sqrt(a[i]/b[i]);
Recent literature is plenty of examples mostly related to GPU code
see for instance
Random
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
10:53:53 UTC ---
works for me ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55636
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11 11:22:15 UTC ---
For completeness: The regression was apparently introduced by the following
revision ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=187472
Btw, how is it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
11:41:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 28926
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28926
gcc48-pr54926.patch
Richard discovered that adding it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
11:51:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Jakub, I presume it's an oversight that the combined tldo_add + store patterns
have a =r constraint on the source operand:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
12:14:31 UTC ---
Okay, I can submit the patch to gcc-patches, but can't do testing of it easily.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
12:18:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
What I don't understand is what is bad with Rolf's proposal of defining STAMP?
Stamping is not that unusual in the build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
--- Comment #5 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11 12:28:55 UTC ---
Sorry, Jakub, I meant to say I am *not* entirely following the explanation...
I can run a regression test with this patch for arm-none-eabi on qemu and/or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
12:45:59 UTC ---
I think so. Let me post to gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
12:54:43 UTC ---
An alternative suggestion was to allow arbitrary complex addresses (well,
arbitrary == gimplified ADDR_EXPRs) in call arguments (either in general
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55644
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55646
Bug #: 55646
Summary: Array of data as argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55646
--- Comment #1 from Alexander bratsinot at gmail dot com 2012-12-11 14:07:21
UTC ---
If write this:
static const uint8_t qwe[] = {0xAA,0xBB,0xCC,0x0A};
fwrite(qwe, 1, 4, stdout);
gcc put data in one piece, something like that:
qwe.2230:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
--- Comment #6 from nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com 2012-12-11
14:14:47 UTC ---
Tobias, what is your full configure line alongside --disable-nls?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11 14:17:33 UTC ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Dec 11 14:17:28 2012
New Revision: 194398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194398
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
--- Comment #4 from Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com 2012-12-11
14:20:57 UTC ---
Should be fixed in trunk now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642
--- Comment #5 from Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com 2012-12-11
14:29:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Should be fixed in trunk now
Can you please check that it works for you now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55645
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-12-11 14:34:45 UTC ---
in principle, one could add the movmsk unconditionally (well, if advantagious)
after the compare and evaluate only one one of legs of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
14:35:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 14:34:57 2012
New Revision: 194401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194401
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55482
Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55648
Bug #: 55648
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution
test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-12-11 15:52:40 UTC ---
Actually we need one for post-darwin11 failures and another for those unique
to
post-darwin12.
Jack,
I don't have access to darwin11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55648
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.4.0 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54061
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
Bug #: 55649
Summary: libstdcxx gdb python pretty printer for tr1 not
working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
--- Comment #1 from Dave Simmonds david.simmonds at igmarkets dot com
2012-12-11 16:19:09 UTC ---
(gdb) print g_epicmap-m_Map
$1 = Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/gdb/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py, line 536, in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55623
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
16:34:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The Tr1UnorderedMapPrinter pretty printer, and other tr1 pretty printers look
for variables starting with _M_, the actual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
--- Comment #3 from Dave Simmonds david.simmonds at igmarkets dot com
2012-12-11 16:49:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
The Tr1UnorderedMapPrinter pretty printer, and other tr1 pretty printers
look
for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55619
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
16:51:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 16:51:16 2012
New Revision: 194404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194404
Log:
PR c++/55619
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55619
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #19 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-12-11
16:55:30 UTC ---
Steven's example only contains 10 000 entries. I need to recompile a symbol
table of 270.000 entries a dozen times each day. (and so do a lot of other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
Dave Simmonds david.simmonds at igmarkets dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
17:05:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28927
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28927
gcc48-pr52640.patch
Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55649
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
Bug #: 55650
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Firefox profiledbuild: libxul.so:
cannot map zero-fill pages: Cannot allocate memory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54974
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
17:36:34 UTC ---
Matt,
Are you planning on backporting this to 4.7 ?
regards
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55193
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
18:01:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:01:09 2012
New Revision: 194405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194405
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54416
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
18:17:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:16:50 2012
New Revision: 194408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194408
Log:
PR c++/54416
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55651
Bug #: 55651
Summary: gcc hangs when -Wp, is passed on the command line
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
--- Comment #15 from Zdenek Dvorak rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
18:19:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 28928
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28928
A proposed patch
This patch fixes the error (and also makes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
18:42:37 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:42:31 2012
New Revision: 194410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194410
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
18:44:57 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:44:48 2012
New Revision: 194411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194411
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
18:45:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:45:45 2012
New Revision: 194412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194412
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
18:46:30 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:46:20 2012
New Revision: 194413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194413
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54121
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
19:01:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 19:01:45 2012
New Revision: 194415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194415
Log:
PR c++/55643
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
19:06:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 11 19:06:19 2012
New Revision: 194416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194416
Log:
PR c++/55643
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652
Bug #: 55652
Summary: [C++11][4.8] ICE (segfault) with templates and structs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55193
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55643
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Holbert dholbert at cs dot stanford.edu 2012-12-11
19:20:34 UTC ---
Thanks for the quick turnaround!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #154 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2012-12-11
19:30:53 UTC ---
What was the size of the gcc lto/pgo binary before the change to use the
histogram? Was it close to the gcc 4.7 lto/pgo size? In that case that is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55653
Bug #: 55653
Summary: Unnecessary initialization of vector register
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55624
--- Comment #4 from shawn.pringle at gmail dot com 2012-12-11 19:45:23 UTC ---
On 10/12/2012 6:44 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55624
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #23 from Rolf Ebert rolf.ebert.gcc at gmx dot de 2012-12-11
19:57:34 UTC ---
I see Eric's point in that the patch in comment #5 hides another bug in the
Makefile chemistry. There seems to be an unnecessary dependency from the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55653
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55654
Bug #: 55654
Summary: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
++
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/string1.mm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -nostdinc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
Bug #: 55655
Summary: cannot export specialized template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/torture/strings/string1.m
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime
-mno-constant-cfstrings -Wno-deprecated-declarations
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo