[Bug middle-end/60469] simple cilk plus program ICEs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #10) I'm not questioning the analysis, I'm questioning the solution. Directly generating a register and jamming in the

[Bug c/60784] Spurious -Wmissing-field-initializers warning for anonymous structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #208 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Both issues from Comment 201 were fixed by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00338.html

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Apr 8 08:23:56 2014 New Revision: 209210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209210root=gccview=rev Log: PR ada/60411 *

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/60779] -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60779 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto,

[Bug target/60778] shift not folded into shift on x86-64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60778 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*,

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Apr 8 09:03:42 2014 New Revision: 209211 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209211root=gccview=rev Log: PR ada/60411 * sigtramp-armdroid.c:

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #5 from Laura C lauraelcomeau at yahoo dot co.uk --- Yes, I type ./JIM_exenamelist.txt to run the executable. The executable appears to read the files under the 'grids' section of the namelist successfully, but produces this error

[Bug lto/60779] -fcx-fortran-rules ignored when using -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60779 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note this applies to the case where you don't specify any -fcx-* flag on the linker command-line (or on any of the input TUs, but merging conflicting flags there doesn't work).

[Bug libstdc++/60594] std::function of a type with a declared (but not defined) return type fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60594 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mitsuru Kariya from comment #5) FYI, the BUG2 above is compiled successfully by gcc 4.7.3. Yes, but std::function in 4.7.3 fails other, more important tests.

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Curly quotes in met_file = ‘met_04270_62_65.txt’ The following code implicit none character(len=70) :: dem_file='', ! Elevation file name met_file='', !

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/60602] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c FAILs on Solaris 9/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ro Date: Tue Apr 8 10:56:04 2014 New Revision: 209213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209213root=gccview=rev Log: XFAIL gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c on Solaris 9/SPARC (PR

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/60785] [4.9 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60785 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 8 10:59:40 2014 New Revision: 209214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209214root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-08 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug target/60602] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c FAILs on Solaris 9/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60602 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/60500] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Spurious warning on derived type initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug debug/60655] [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655 --- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- I haven't had enough time to work on this one but in the interest of getting this sorted for 4.9, I'm handling this as suggested by Jakub in the backend under

[Bug target/60653] [4.9 Regression] gfortran: ICE (segmentation fault) in lra

with: /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/configure --target=arm-suse-linux-gnueabihf --enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20140408 (experimental) (GCC) thus, fixed?

[Bug debug/60655] [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655 --- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32564 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32564action=edit patch... Fix so far tested just on the reduced and the full testcase. No issues.

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are built-in, in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- 4.8 prints t.ii: In function ‘void _Z3fooi.constprop.0()’: t.ii:14:8: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] z[i] = i; ^ which isn't perfect

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are built-in, in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 ---

[Bug c++/60786] New: In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786 Bug ID: 60786 Summary: In C++11 an explicit instantiation with an unqualified name must be in the right namespace Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/60655] [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 32565 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32565action=edit gcc49-pr60655.patch Alternate fix, the issue on the non-fdata-sections testcase is that

[Bug libfortran/60706] FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_kind_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original var2 = 42949673 00;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60706 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 8 12:57:07 2014 New Revision: 209216 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209216root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-08 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug libfortran/60706] FAIL: gfortran.dg/size_kind_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original var2 = 42949673 00;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60706 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/60300] [avr] Suboptimal stack pointer manipulation for frame setup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60300 --- Comment #3 from Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin dot nl --- Hmm, I don't think the gcc sources support that. AFAICT, they attempt to just find the shortest approach, without caring for speed. For example, look at avr.c, around line 1265,

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are built-in, in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) does former_clone_of apply recursively? Thus can we have a clone of a clone? Is there a way to pretty-print the kind of clone?

[Bug middle-end/60787] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 Bug ID: 60787 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: EH,

[Bug middle-end/60787] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.4, 4.8.0,

[Bug middle-end/60787] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Maybe latent on 4.8/4.9, different inlining happens there.

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are built-in, in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) which isn't perfect either. Is there a way for the C++ FE to get at the original function decl that was cloned? Like with

[Bug middle-end/60787] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_eh_common, at except.c:1953

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60787 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/60776] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: krebbel Date: Tue Apr 8 14:18:46 2014 New Revision: 209221 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209221root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-08 Andreas Krebbel

[Bug target/60653] [4.9 Regression] gfortran: ICE (segmentation fault) in lra

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/60776] [4.9 Regression] FAIL gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-6.c and gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Gentlemen, I really do not understand this discussion. I used the term crude and receive a response that it is not crude, but it is dangerous. WTF? Why is anyone trying to sell the

[Bug middle-end/58101] Wrong out-of-bounds warning under -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58101 Mikhail Veltishchev dichlofos-mv at yandex dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ipa/60761] [4.9 Regression] Names of all function clones in g++ are built-in, in both warnings and dumps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60761 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) 4.8 prints t.ii: In function ‘void _Z3fooi.constprop.0()’: t.ii:14:8: warning: array subscript is above array bounds

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:21:13PM +, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at

[Bug libstdc++/60037] SIGFPE in std::generate_canonicalunsigned int...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- clang's ubsan finds two errors /home/jwakely/src/gcc/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/random.tcc:3478: runtime error: value 4.29497e+09 is outside the range

[Bug target/60788] New: Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 Bug ID: 60788 Summary: Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/60788] Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 --- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com --- Sorry. The optimization has nothing to do with it, it just causes the constant expressions used for testing to be evaluated at compile time. The real issue is that the lzcnt

[Bug target/60459] Crash seen in _Unwind_VRS_Pop() for ARM platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60459 Murali murali.marimekala at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/51088] undefined label with statement expression and cond expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51088 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch to give an error if taking an address of a label defined in ({}): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00381.html

[Bug target/60788] Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32557|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment on attachment 32568 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32568 Patch with changelog and comment. Okay. Thanks for the clarification.

[Bug sanitizer/60745] Many ICEs running libstdc++ testsuite with ubsan, maybe due to PCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60745 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Apr 8 17:23:26 2014 New Revision: 209222 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209222root=gccview=rev Log: PR sanitizer/60745 * c-ubsan.c: Include

[Bug sanitizer/60745] Many ICEs running libstdc++ testsuite with ubsan, maybe due to PCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60745 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #17 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm just saying this for the record, and also to justify why I think the other use of simplify_gen_subreg is correct. (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #18 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Apr 8 17:50:45 2014 New Revision: 209223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209223root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/60763 *

[Bug target/60788] Miscompilation of __builtin_clz with -mlzcnt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60788 --- Comment #3 from Allan Jensen linux at carewolf dot com --- Sorry for the confusion. I thought Intel had added it from Ivy Bridge, but it was Haswell.

[Bug libstdc++/60789] New: [4.9 Regression] Missing -lm while checking for math functions (e.g., atan2f)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60789 Bug ID: 60789 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Missing -lm while checking for math functions (e.g., atan2f) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/60774] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Apr 8 20:35:14 2014 New Revision: 209227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209227root=gccview=rev Log: PR ada/60411 * sigtramp.h: Add

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnugcc at marino dot

[Bug ada/60411] ADA bootstrap failure on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411 --- Comment #12 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st --- I am also seeing these errors: s-intman.adb:263:32: SA_NODEFER is not visible s-intman.adb:263:32: non-visible declaration at s-linux.ads:110 s-intman.adb:263:45: SA_RESTART is not

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #7 from Laura C lauraelcomeau at yahoo dot co.uk --- I've tried changing the Input.f90 code to character(len=70) :: dem_file='', ! Elevation file name met_file='', ! Driving data file name vegf_file='', !

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #8 from Laura C lauraelcomeau at yahoo dot co.uk --- I've tried changing the Input.f90 code to character(len=70) :: dem_file='', ! Elevation file name met_file='', ! Driving data file name vegf_file='', !

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- Is this what you meant by the 'curly quotes'? No. Your input file contains curly quotes. I've changed the curly quotes to # show you where the problem lies.

[Bug c++/59115] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Apr 9 00:09:28 2014 New Revision: 209230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209230root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2014-04-08 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/59115] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug go/60790] New: libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790 Bug ID: 60790 Summary: libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/60790] libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790 Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32569|0 |1 is

[Bug c/59073] [4.9 Regression] ICE with missing increment in OpenMP for-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59073 Arseny Solokha asolokha at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx

[Bug libgcc/60790] libatomic convenience library selects IFUNC implementation before obtaining cpu info.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/50160] vectorbool comparison very slow (no overload)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160 Elizbath Martin elizbathjames at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/11751] wrong evaluation order of an expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11751 Elizbath Martin elizbathjames at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|