https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #1 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
Challenging to reduce a small case, as inlining impacts optimization behavior.
Trying to describe the problem as clear as possible.
Problemetic generated code:
mov r0, r10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #2 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 33871
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33871action=edit
Reduced rtl dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #3 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 33872
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33872action=edit
Reduced rtl dump previous pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63719
Bug ID: 63719
Summary: gcc-set-multilib-library-path usage outside of
gcc/testsuite/
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #4 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 33873
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33873action=edit
Preprocessed testcase
Options to reproduce:
-march=armv4t -mthumb -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63717
Morwenn morwenn29 at hotmail dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63716
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
means you ran out of memory and the kernel decided to kill GCC.
I'd say try without -g or with -fno-var-tracking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63708
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63720
Bug ID: 63720
Summary: Ada bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63695
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63720
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #6 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
(In reply to vries from comment #5)
Could you try out the patch and see if it fixes things for you?
Tom, thanks for the quick action. Apparantly this patch should recover the
bootstrap. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63712
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Mon Nov 3 10:36:35 2014
New Revision: 217033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217033root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-03 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57820
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Mon Nov 3 10:47:04 2014
New Revision: 217034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217034root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-03 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57820
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 3 10:49:05 2014
New Revision: 217035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217035root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-03 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63721
Bug ID: 63721
Summary: [5 Regression] IPA ICF cause
atomic-comp-swap-release-acquire.c ICE on arm
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joey Ye from comment #6)
(In reply to vries from comment #5)
Could you try out the patch and see if it fixes things for you?
Tom, thanks for the quick action. Apparantly this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63709
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61997
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
--- Comment #19 from karsten karo13de at googlemail dot com ---
Merci François for your efforts.
I have replaced the resp. library by my MacPorts build and it compiles now!
Perhaps a hacker way, however. Perhaps I install the compiler from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
--- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to karsten from comment #19)
I have replaced the resp. library by my MacPorts build and it compiles now!
Perhaps a hacker way, however. Perhaps I install
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63709
Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
--- Comment #21 from karsten karo13de at googlemail dot com ---
Thank you, but the 4.9.0 Mavericks built throws the same error:
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
___cxa_throw_bad_array_new_length, referenced from:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56917
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 3 12:35:35 2014
New Revision: 217036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217036root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/52769
* gcc.dg/pr52769.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 3 12:37:59 2014
New Revision: 217037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217037root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/52769
* gcc.dg/pr52769.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Nov 3 12:39:42 2014
New Revision: 217038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217038root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/52769
* gcc.dg/pr52769.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
--- Comment #4 from petschy at gmail dot com ---
Sorry, but this is definitely not the same issue. Bug 38958 is about returning
by value and binding to a reference. This issue is about returning a REFERENCE
and binding it to a reference. No class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63722
Bug ID: 63722
Summary: Dwarf DW_AT_inline incorrect for abstract origins
created for ipa-sra, ipa-split and ipa-cp
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63198
--- Comment #2 from Bob Abeles eightycc at gmail dot com ---
This bug occurs when cp/parser.c:cp_parser_name() while parsing 'decltype(y =
y)::t1' is called on 't1'. Earlier, the decltype has been determined to be
dependent (it isn't actually in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Bug ID: 63723
Summary: Narrowing conversion allowed in braced init list in
SFINAE context
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 10/31/2014 5:30 PM, aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi wrote:
I was able to isolate the problem to GLIBC elf/dl-conflict.c and specifically
hppa specific elf_machine_rela function called from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63724
Bug ID: 63724
Summary: [AArch64] Inefficient immediate expansion and
hoisting.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63724
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63725
Bug ID: 63725
Summary: Scalar_Storage_Order is required for nested string
types, but cannot be added to those types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63721
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #2 from Tavian Barnes tavianator at gmail dot com ---
It's decltype(requires_conversionTo2({std::declvalFrom2()})). Not sure why
it says missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #2 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
How do you suggest I bootstrap then?
There are some ancient RPM versions I know of, but they break AIX in that
they introduce non-standard libraries I am trying to avoid.
While
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #3 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33879
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33879action=edit
script-capture of 4.7.4 bootstrap attempt on AIX
two script files capturing all screen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #4 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33880
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33880action=edit
script-capture of 4.6.4 bootstrap attempt on AIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63595
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Same problem can be even seen on x86_64-linux-pc:
_ZNK13TriangulationILi3EE3endEv:
.LFB5569:
.cfi_startproc
subq$24, %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
movq%rsp, %rdi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62272
rippey.e at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rippey.e at gmail dot com
||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
||com
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
The problem seems to be fixed in gcc HEAD 5.0.0 20141103 (experimental).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41991
Bug 41991 depends on bug 44107, which changed state.
Bug 44107 Summary: gcc emits frame (epilogue) info incompatible with the darwin
{8,9}-unwinder,10-compacter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #32 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #31)
WONTFIX sounds reasonable
Okay.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63726
Bug ID: 63726
Summary: -Xlinker --threads cause random crash on gcc 4.9.2
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63726
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
I fear that after being set to wontfix an entry such as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714 will be completely
ignored.
That is not what I was expecting having spent nearly 8 hours yesterday
looking for something I may have missed.
I do not understand how to move forward from:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727
Bug ID: 63727
Summary: Checks missing for proc-pointer components: Usage as
actual argument when elemental
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
What I have not yet found is how to get the SHELL variable to not use
/bin/sh because this is causing a failure immediately at the start of
make:
root@x064:[/data/prj/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc-4.7.4]make
[ -f stage_final ] || echo stage3 stage_final
/bin/sh[3]: 0403-057 Syntax error at line 1 :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63538
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#Configuration_fails_with_.27.27configure:_error:_cannot_compute_suffix_of_object_files:_cannot_compile.27.27._What_is_the_problem.3F
(and for selecting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #6 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
thanks. it is night. shall look at this again tomorrow.
had not spotted CONFIG_SHELL among the how to build ada text. I had been
trying to follow what seemed relevant. must write my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||htl10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63698
--- Comment #7 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, looks like I had forgotten node with only a left child, too bad. My
initial plan was to use existing tree node algos in tree.cc but erase could not
be done without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34957
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34584
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61099
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56196
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63728
Bug ID: 63728
Summary: Memory exhaustion using constexpr constructors for
classes with large array members
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #8 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
(In reply to vries from comment #5)
Created attachment 33874 [details]
tentative patch, adds missing clobbers
This patch does recover thumb1 bootstrap
- Joey
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
Bug ID: 63729
Summary: Type-punning through a union fails to circumvent
strict aliasing under certain conditions.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is no type punning through an union here. You can't use a cast to do the
type punning through an union.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
--- Comment #2 from mednafen at gmail dot com ---
If this construct is invalid as you say it is, then how exactly is one supposed
to access data of arbitrary types at arbitrary byte offsets in a contiguous
chunk of memory?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to mednafen from comment #2)
If this construct is invalid as you say it is, then how exactly is one
supposed to access data of arbitrary types at arbitrary byte offsets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63729
mednafen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57740
Michael mjbshaw at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjbshaw at hotmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63730
Bug ID: 63730
Summary: C++11 ICE REGRESSION mangling template alias into
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42618
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org ---
This is fixed in 4.9.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13). Close?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42618
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
86 matches
Mail list logo
