https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64348
Bug ID: 64348
Summary: Case scal-to-vec1.c failed on arm-linux-gnueabi with
-fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ondřej Čertík from comment #14)
I tested it and it seems to be working! The code compiled with
non_overridable on.
Great. Thanks for checking.
There are run-time segfaults and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64344
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34297
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34297action=edit
gcc5-pr64344.patch
Untested fix, but this is getting way too ugly. Furthermore, e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64344
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34297|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59383
naup at sfr dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naup at sfr dot fr
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64343
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that we should update the documentation about this change (and throw away
all option handling of optimize/target attribute handled options from
lto-wrapper,
or rather move all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64348
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
Bug ID: 64349
Summary: [5 Regression] Bootstrapping Ada fails on
darwin(9|10).
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34299
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34299action=edit
proper fix.
So, the rules on Darwin say that it's OK to access _environ directly from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 18 12:02:22 2014
New Revision: 218860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218860root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR ipa/64146
PR ipa/64146
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64146
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #29 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 18 12:06:34 2014
New Revision: 218861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218861root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR bootstrap/63573.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61198
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61198
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zreed1 at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60767
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64330
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 18 13:32:18 2014
New Revision: 218864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218864root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR64330.
PR tree-optimization/64330
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64330
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
--- Comment #11 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com ---
Reduced further:
class base
{
protected:
typedef int type;
};
template typename T
class derive: public base
{
public:
void foo()
{
struct f_t {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63889
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64350
Bug ID: 64350
Summary: TSAN fails after stress-testing for a while
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64350
Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64351
Bug ID: 64351
Summary: std::uniform_real_distributionfloat(0, 1) returns 1
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64291
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The bug is new rematerialization sub-pass in LRA. I'll be working on it.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lucdanton at free dot fr
Created attachment 34300
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34300action=edit
Minimal testcase
Using:
g++-trunk (GCC) 5.0.0 20141218 (experimental)
Testcase:
templatebool B struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hello.
The problem is caused by missing static-chain in newly created GIMPLE_CALL in
expand_thunk:
fpi (struct array7_integer(kind=4) xx1, struct array7_t yy1)
{
bb 2:
fpa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63889
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #4)
is_ok has two levels of template parameters: its own and those for A. An
instantiation needs to provide both levels of args as well. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64011
--- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the problem is we do overflow checking at the start of store_bit_field_1, but
that only check the situation where the field lies completely outside the
register, while there do have
://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20141218 (experimental)
Admittedly the attribute((const)) should not be there. Also, removing 'y' will
also not emit an ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64354
Bug ID: 64354
Summary: no preprocessor symbol __SANITIZE_THREAD__
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64352
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61402
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60955
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Dec 18 17:53:55 2014
New Revision: 218871
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218871root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-12-18 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58066
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com ---
Is there any progress on this? Is it fixed?
I've hit this issue in ThreadSanitizer. It intercepts __tls_get_addr and then
code that uses MOVDQA [rbp] crashes. I remember that I hit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64209
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64343
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Yep, I am slowly working on that: still need to finish upatin ipa passes for
per-function flags (ipa-reference/ipa-icf are two remaining) and we need to
figure out what to do with flags
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #56 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Dec 18 20:12:44 2014
New Revision: 218873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218873root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61407
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64355
Bug ID: 64355
Summary: ICE (segfault) in gfc_zero_size_array with
-fcoarray=single
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64355
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64291
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Dec 18 20:49:44 2014
New Revision: 218874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218874root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-18 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64209
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fdump-tree-original shows the following dump of the copy function (with
gfortran 4.8):
copy (integer(kind=4) restrict a, struct __class__STAR restrict b)
{
{
integer(kind=4) *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64291
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64355
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64209
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 18 22:22:36 2014
New Revision: 218876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218876root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64251
* decl2.c (mark_used): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64352
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 18 22:22:42 2014
New Revision: 218877
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218877root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64352
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
--- Comment #12 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
I can confirm that the proposed patch from comment 11 along with the one from
comment 5 eliminates all of the fortran testsuite regressions on
x86_64-apple-darwin14 at r218871.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54442
Volker Reichelt reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64209
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
The following patch is sufficient to make the reduced test case in comment 2
work:
... but unfortunately it caused a number of testsuite regressions. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64209
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here is a reduced test case for the remaining segfault:
PROGRAM main
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER :: copy_x(3)
CALL copy(1,copy_x)
PRINT *, copy_x
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE copy(x,a)
integer,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59204
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59204
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Dec 18 23:43:46 2014
New Revision: 218878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218878root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-18 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59204
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64105
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Dec 18 23:53:15 2014
New Revision: 218879
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218879root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64105
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Dec 19 00:02:05 2014
New Revision: 218880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218880root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-12-18 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I can confirm that the proposed patch from comment 11 along with the one
from comment 5 eliminates all of the fortran test suite regressions
on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to thopre01 from comment #12)
That's good, it means the pattern is recognized. Is there an optab defined
for bswap16?
Nope. Just this:
(define_insn rotlhi3_8
[(set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64356
Bug ID: 64356
Summary: Some constexpr expressions not recognized as constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #8 from Tavian Barnes tavianator at gmail dot com ---
Actually it is a regression: according to http://gcc.godbolt.org/, GCC 4.6.4
compiled it correctly with -std=c++0x and
typedef decltype(helperFrom, To(0)) type;
instead of
=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141218 (experimental) [trunk revision 218871] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c small.c
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
$ gcc-4.9 -Os -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c
small.c
67 matches
Mail list logo
