[Bug fortran/68968] Internal Compiler error with cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68968 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68963] [4.9/5/6 Regression] O3 vs. O2 discards part of loop and terminates early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68963 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/68707] [6 Regression] testcase gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr36098.c vectorized using VEC_PERM_EXPR rather than VEC_LOAD_LANES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707 > > --- Comment #21 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Here's the smallest

[Bug rtl-optimization/68796] Make use of and-immediate+compare instructions more robust

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68796 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Dec 18 09:58:07 2015 New Revision: 231810 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231810=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR rtl-optimization/68796 Add compare-of-zero_extract

[Bug tree-optimization/68956] [6 regression] Vectorizer miscompilation of 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68956 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Fri Dec 18 10:01:02 2015 New Revision: 231811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231811=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR tree-optimization/68956 * tree-vect-stmts.c

[Bug tree-optimization/68956] [6 regression] Vectorizer miscompilation of 416.gamess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68956 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64* Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/68954] [5/6 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations -Werror errors for system header templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68954 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/68906] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68906 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Fri Dec 18 10:16:56 2015 New Revision: 231812 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231812=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ 2015-12-18 Yuri Rumyantsev PR

[Bug tree-optimization/68951] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_update_misalignment_for_peel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68951 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68964] [6 regression] Internal compiler error for test case gcc.dg/tm/20100610.c since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68964 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug fortran/68800] Fortran FE produces many memory leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68971] -Woverflow false alarm in code unreachable after __builtin_mul_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971 --- Comment #6 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > This is a valid constant expression I'm aware of the distinction between constant and other expressions. I'm trying to give the ordinary user's viewpoint, not the

[Bug c++/68795] [6 Regression] Use of uninitialised value of size 8 in cp_parser_postfix_expression (parser.c:6831)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68795 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi David, > Bother; I have another patch for this I was about to post, which is > bootstrapping right now Oops - sorry for treading on your toes! Cheers Nick

[Bug tree-optimization/68946] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32- and 64-bit modes (in vect_analyze_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8013)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68946 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/68962] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_analyze_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8013 when building 416.gamess on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68962 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/68196] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68196 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Dec 18 09:34:13 2015 New Revision: 231807 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231807=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68196

[Bug c++/68954] [5/6 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations -Werror errors for system header templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68954 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 17 Dec 2015, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68954 > > --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug fortran/68534] No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68534 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/67592] A virtual member function declared constexpr fails to trigger a diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67592 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 --- Comment #11 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #9) ... > > > > Please try > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01759.html Testsuite run with "-fPIC -fno-plt"

[Bug testsuite/68776] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-[su]16.c failures since r226675

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > On December 17, 2015 4:19:00 PM GMT+01:00, "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" > wrote: >

[Bug c++/68978] New: [6 Regression] bogus error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68978 Bug ID: 68978 Summary: [6 Regression] bogus error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/68910] [5/6 regression] huge stack frame and poor code with instruction scheduling at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > In case I revert (e.g. double revert) to enable the LRA for SPARC > > commit a28f6dc56909fc35dd83d4364bc68c69e2450a51 > Author: davem > Date: Tue Sep 22

[Bug fortran/68649] [6 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/68385] [6 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/68978] [6 Regression] bogus error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68978 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/62236] : error: aggregate value used where an integer was expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62236 --- Comment #5 from Victor Porton --- Not fixed in 5.3.1.

[Bug rtl-optimization/65980] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure building Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65980 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/67598] [6 Regression] Target powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe failed to bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67598 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug ada/62042] Missing optimization of copying non-limited objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042 --- Comment #9 from Victor Porton --- Not fixed in 5.3.1.

[Bug other/66827] [6 Regression] left shifts of negative value warnings due to C++14 switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug ada/62235] segmentation fault on Ada 2012 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235 --- Comment #7 from Victor Porton --- Not fixed in 5.3.1.

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/65931] [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug ipa/66764] [6 Regression] ICE in analyze_function() on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66764 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/68979] New: [6 Regression] error: left operand of shift expression ‘(-1 << 4)’ is negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68979 Bug ID: 68979 Summary: [6 Regression] error: left operand of shift expression ‘(-1 << 4)’ is negative Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/68977] [gomp4] FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/loop-2.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68977 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/68979] [6 Regression] error: left operand of shift expression ‘(-1 << 4)’ is negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68979 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/68979] [6 Regression] error: left operand of shift expression ‘(-1 << 4)’ is negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68979 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Why do you think this is a bug? Note that -1 << 4 is rejected in a context > where an integer constant expression is required only in C++11/14. I think

[Bug go/68980] [6 regression] ps -o cmd in gotest isn't portable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68980 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug go/68980] New: [6 regression] ps -o cmd in gotest isn't portable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68980 Bug ID: 68980 Summary: [6 regression] ps -o cmd in gotest isn't portable Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- trippels@gcc2-power8 ~ % ../gcc/configure --enable-checking=valgrind --with-cpu=power8 --disable-libsanitizer --disable-bootstrap --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-libitm

[Bug libstdc++/68982] New: Missing explicit qualification for std::forward in functional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68982 Bug ID: 68982 Summary: Missing explicit qualification for std::forward in functional Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/68895] [ARM] ICE with target attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68895 --- Comment #3 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37083 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37083=edit fix under validation Initial patch to recompute DECL_MODE

[Bug target/65931] [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Any news on this? If we want to workaround it, it should be bisected and > analyzed what is the difference in the debug info. > Or just use a

[Bug middle-end/67639] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67639 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/68982] Missing explicit qualification for std::forward in functional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68982 --- Comment #2 from Roger Orr --- Created attachment 37082 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37082=edit Example of failure, against code using boost 1.57.0

[Bug target/68674] ARM/AARCH64 attribute target neon internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |chrbr at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/68977] [gomp4] FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/loop-2.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68977 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- As the code is ill-formed, and IIUC the error only happens if we;ve seen an error, I suggest push_gimplify_context (!seen_error ()); No point making the compiler work harder than necesary in the usual

[Bug c++/68975] Request: Provide alternate keyword for decltype in C++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68975 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I see that clang supports __decltype (but not __decltype__, strangely)

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Isn't this related or dup of PR66745 ? > > As for the lvalue error, reduced testcase is: > template > int > foo (int max, int i, int radix, int c) > { >

[Bug tree-optimization/68835] [5 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with __int128 bit field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 18 14:38:17 2015 New Revision: 231817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231817=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-12-17 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 --- Comment #2 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Fri Dec 18 15:17:09 2015 New Revision: 231819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231819=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-18 Ville Voutilainen PR

[Bug libstdc++/68984] New: error: ‘constexpr bool std::isinf(double)’ conflicts with a previous declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68984 Bug ID: 68984 Summary: error: ‘constexpr bool std::isinf(double)’ conflicts with a previous declaration Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/68674] ARM/AARCH64 attribute target neon internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674 --- Comment #13 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37084 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37084=edit preliminary fix

[Bug ipa/68981] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr60640-4.C FAILs with -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68981 Bug ID: 68981 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr60640-4.C FAILs with -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libstdc++/68982] Missing explicit qualification for std::forward in functional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68982 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 37081 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37081=edit unreduced testcase

[Bug c++/68970] Missing "expected ; after class" message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68970 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/68835] [5 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with __int128 bit field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67710] FAIL: gcc.dg/darwin-*version-*.c (test for excess errors) with Xcode 7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- Unfortunately, it doesn't work on Mac OS X 10.11.2: every link test FAILs with FAIL: 17_intro/freestanding.cc (test for excess errors) Excess errors: ld: warning: object file

[Bug testsuite/68776] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-[su]16.c failures since r226675

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/68776] [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-[su]16.c failures since r226675

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68776 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Dec 18 13:52:11 2015 New Revision: 231815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231815=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-18 Richard Biener PR testsuite/68776

[Bug c++/68983] New: [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 Bug ID: 68983 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- *** Bug 66745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/66745] [6 Regression] ice in check_unstripped_args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66745 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68674] ARM/AARCH64 attribute target neon internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674 --- Comment #12 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #8) > (In reply to chrbr from comment #7) > > I was suggesting in #68934 to make this code invalid and report an error. > > Since SIMD types should not be used

[Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.8 Regression] NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 == NULL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847 --- Comment #40 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Dec 18 17:17:14 2015 New Revision: 231821 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231821=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH] [PR rtl-optimization/49847] Fix ICE in CSE due to cc0-setter and cc0-user

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 37091 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37091=edit unreduced testcase

[Bug testsuite/68913] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/lto/pr61886 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68913 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/55598] LRA on powerpc does not like assembler in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/60044] Template argument of alias template not evaluated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60044 Roman Perepelitsa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor --- The sanitizer tests are still failing and this bug still hasn't been fixed. The patch in r224402 was only partial, committed on the assumption that the LLVM AddressSantitizer maintainers would approve my

[Bug c++/68978] [6 Regression] bogus error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68978 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Created attachment 37089 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37089=edit Another testcase, Attaching another testcase. Hopefully it's fixed by the pending patch from David.

[Bug libfortran/68987] New: double free or corruption in _gfortran_st_write_done when a write statement to an internal file uses an invalid format and the ERR= specifier appears.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68987 Bug ID: 68987 Summary: double free or corruption in _gfortran_st_write_done when a write statement to an internal file uses an invalid format and the ERR= specifier appears.

[Bug c/68971] -Woverflow false alarm in code unreachable after __builtin_mul_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- I didn't mean to sound like I was lecturing you, just trying to draw a clear distinction between the cases. Perhaps what's needed is for GCC to treat the builtins as constant expressions when they're invoked

[Bug c/68971] -Woverflow false alarm in code unreachable after __builtin_mul_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68971 --- Comment #8 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > Perhaps what's needed is for GCC to treat the builtins as constant > expressions when they're invoked with them as operands. If you agree with > that approach, I

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-*-linux* CC|

[Bug c/68986] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68986 Bug ID: 68986 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/68986] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68986 --- Comment #1 from jas...@3db-labs.com --- Created attachment 37088 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37088=edit preprocessed output file from gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/68967] Build and test parloops on by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68967 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37069|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68985] New: braced initializer bug when defining a static constexpr int within a class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68985 Bug ID: 68985 Summary: braced initializer bug when defining a static constexpr int within a class Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/58967] Powerpc -mlra cannot compile quadrature_lib.cc in Spec2006 with -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/68120] can't easily deal with integer overflow at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68120 --- Comment #2 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to Paul Eggert from comment #0) > I am working around the problem with macro definitions like this: > > # define INT_ADD_OVERFLOW(a, b) \ >(__builtin_constant_p ((a) == (b)) \ > ?

[Bug target/65421] inefficient code returning float aggregates on powepc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65421 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-03-18 00:00:00 |2015-12-18 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/67592] A virtual member function declared constexpr fails to trigger a diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67592 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Dec 18 18:18:47 2015 New Revision: 231824 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231824=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2015-12-18 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/68819] Invalid "-Wmisleading-indentation" warning if location_t >=LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68819 --- Comment #10 from David Malcolm --- Updated patch, which addresses the LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS limit: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01921.html

[Bug c++/67592] A virtual member function declared constexpr fails to trigger a diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67592 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/66312] [SH] Regression: Bootstrap failure gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs with gcc-4.8/4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/68988] reload_pseudo_compare_func violates qsort requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68988 --- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov --- The bug was detected with SortChecker tool (https://github.com/yugr/sortcheck).

[Bug c++/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug libfortran/68987] [5/6 Regression] double free or corruption in _gfortran_st_write_done when a write statement to an internal file uses an invalid format and the ERR= specifier appears.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68987 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37092 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37092=edit gcc6-pr68763.patch SO, I've tried to write a patch for this, and it passed bootstrap, but introduced: +FAIL:

  1   2   >