[Bug c/69187] New: ICE: Aborted when native compiling neon code with __builtin_neon_vmlals_lanev4hi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69187 Bug ID: 69187 Summary: ICE: Aborted when native compiling neon code with __builtin_neon_vmlals_lanev4hi Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/14608] nukes isfinite macro from

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnu at bluedreamer dot com ---

[Bug libstdc++/44611] Including and hides ::signbit function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44611 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/55139] __atomic store does not support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- This was fixed for 4.8.0 by r193363, right?

[Bug libstdc++/55233] libstdc++ atomic does not support hle_acquire/release

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55233 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Andi, this was fixed by r195321 and so can be closed, right?

[Bug c/68966] atomic_fetch_* on atomic_bool not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60637] --fast-math breaks std::signbit function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60637 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks to PR 36757 __builtin_signbit is now generic, so this is fixed on trunk.

[Bug bootstrap/68346] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60263] [DR 2237] C++11 header "cuchar" is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60263 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/63780] std::remquo returns wrong quotient

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63780 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/14608] nukes isfinite macro from

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/68966] atomic_fetch_* on atomic_bool not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68966 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Jan 8 01:00:25 2016 New Revision: 232147 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232147=gcc=rev Log: PR c/68966 - atomic_fetch_* on atomic_bool not diagnosed gcc/ChangeLog: *

[Bug rtl-optimization/69161] [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt --- I haven't debugged how it's created but I agree that we're looking at invalid RTL here.

[Bug libstdc++/59665] User code can cause ambiguous references to "std" in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59665 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug target/69175] [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69176] [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69174] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in operand_equal_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69174 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I see also the second ICE rather than the first one. dr_chain is created for ncopies == 3, but then we attempt to access indexes 2 and 3 in it. Richard, can you please have a look?

[Bug tree-optimization/69172] [6 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu | |aarch64-linux-gnu

[Bug target/69180] New: [ARM] #pragma GCC target should not warn about redefined macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69180 Bug ID: 69180 Summary: [ARM] #pragma GCC target should not warn about redefined macros Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/69175] [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- In my cross compiler configured with checking I get an ICE earlier in ifcvt: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault } ^ 0xc8e934 crash_signal $SRC/gcc/toplev.c:334 0x8c89e5

[Bug target/69176] [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/60585] Virtual function related memory access errors with multiple virtual inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60585 Andris Pavenis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68960] __attribute__ ((aligned ())) is ignored for OpenMP private variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68960 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for GCC 6+ so far.

[Bug tree-optimization/69141] [6 Regression] -O2 -fdump-tree-fre ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69141 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69171] [6 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn: on x86_64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37244 [details] > A patch The patch fixes the regressions FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/SFset.c -O1 (internal compiler error) ... I saw on x86_64-apple-darwin15 without

[Bug tree-optimization/69172] [6 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69172 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37246 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37246=edit gcc6-pr69172.patch Untested fix. That said, the testcase is undefined behavior at runtime (both because the src and

[Bug tree-optimization/69167] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: SSA corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69167 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu | |aarch64-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/69174] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in operand_equal_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69174 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I wonder if the first ICE is due to not having checking enabled ...

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #28 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #27) > ...so ragged in fact that it fails at all levels of optimization I > have not had time these last days to come back to it and understand >

[Bug middle-end/67639] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67639 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Thu Jan 7 12:17:39 2016 New Revision: 232125 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232125=gcc=rev Log: Fix SSA inconsistencies with invalid asm reg names (PR67639) PR

[Bug fortran/69154] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_where_2, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5005 on *-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug lto/69082] Final link fails on ARM using lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082 --- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw --- Ah! And the maximum range of offset for these relocations in REL format is -32768,+32767.

[Bug ipa/66616] [4.9/5/6 regression] fipa-cp-clone ignores thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616 --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor --- Yesterday Honza told me on IRC to check that the new artificial thunk has local flag set. However, it appears that it does (in set_new_clone_decl_and_node_flags), so I am going to investigate further.

[Bug tree-optimization/69109] [6 Regression] missing phi argument ICE in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt with -O2 -funswitch-loops -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69109 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- -funswitch-loops introduces degenerate phis in a loop latch (bb 9): ... ;; basic block 9, loop depth 1, count 0, freq 4900, maybe hot ;;prev block 8, next block 10, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE) ;;

[Bug tree-optimization/69164] [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimple-expr.c:468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69164 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/66616] [4.9/5/6 regression] fipa-cp-clone ignores thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616 --- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor --- So it was a near miss, the problem appears to be the can_change_signature flag instead. The following seems to fix the -m32 failure. I'm going to bootstrap it and if it passes, send it to the mailing

[Bug tree-optimization/69107] [6 Regression] def does not dominate use ICE with -O2 -funswitch-loops -ftree-paralellize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69107 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- There are various ways to hit this issue, some of which mean it can be considered a regression, because the same code compiled with older releases (before we added the C++11 definitions of isinf/isnan) or

[Bug libstdc++/69114] A couple allocator-related helpers should use __addressof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69114 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jan 7 15:01:33 2016 New Revision: 232129 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232129=gcc=rev Log: Use std::addressof in insert iterators, allocators and promises PR

[Bug libstdc++/69105] front_/back_/insert_iterator should use addressof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69105 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jan 7 15:01:33 2016 New Revision: 232129 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232129=gcc=rev Log: Use std::addressof in insert iterators, allocators and promises PR

[Bug c/50584] No warning for passing small array to C99 static array declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69107] [6 Regression] def does not dominate use ICE with -O2 -funswitch-loops -ftree-paralellize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69107 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- -funswitch-loops introduces a degenerate phi (.MEM_74) in the latch block (bb 13), which is not removed before parloops: ... ;; basic block 11, loop depth 1, count 0, freq 2500, maybe hot ;;

[Bug libstdc++/68984] error: ‘constexpr bool std::isinf(double)’ conflicts with a previous declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68984 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/60407] [C++11] call of overloaded ‘isnan’ is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60407 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69175] [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at kernel dot

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dilawar.s.rajput at gmail dot com

[Bug lto/69082] Final link fails on ARM using lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082 --- Comment #8 from PeteVine --- I've just discovered this particular instance is not related to -flto at all but rather to `-fprofile-generate -ftest-coverage`. The previous assembly sample mentioned lto at least: movwr4,

[Bug target/69171] [6 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn: on x86_64 with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69182] New: Internal compiler error, dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1550

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69182 Bug ID: 69182 Summary: Internal compiler error, dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2cfi.c:1550 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/64946] [AArch64] gcc.target/aarch64/vect-abs-compile.c - "abs" vectorization fails for char/short types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgomp/69183] New: ICE when using OpenMP PRIVATE keyword in OMP DO loop not explicitly encapsulated in OMP PARALLEL region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69183 Bug ID: 69183 Summary: ICE when using OpenMP PRIVATE keyword in OMP DO loop not explicitly encapsulated in OMP PARALLEL region Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/60637] --fast-math breaks std::signbit function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60637 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Severity|major

[Bug lto/69188] ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188 --- Comment #5 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com --- I forgot to mention, modifying the compile script in any of the following ways prevents the ICE from occurring: 1. Compile all sources at same optimization levels. 2. Remove -fprofile-generate.

[Bug lto/69188] ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188 --- Comment #4 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 37261 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37261=edit Source file 3.

[Bug other/61439] contrib/download_prerequisites script does not verify integrity of packages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439 --- Comment #3 from daube --- Created attachment 37263 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37263=edit Verify checksums of tarballs obtained with contrib/download_prerequisites

[Bug rtl-optimization/68909] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Jan 8 03:58:40 2016 New Revision: 232148 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232148=gcc=rev Log: shrink-wrap: Once more PRs 67778, 68634, and now 68909 If a candidate PRE

[Bug target/68634] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2284 w/ -O2 -fmodulo-sched

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68634 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Jan 8 03:58:40 2016 New Revision: 232148 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232148=gcc=rev Log: shrink-wrap: Once more PRs 67778, 68634, and now 68909 If a candidate PRE

[Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778 --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Jan 8 03:58:40 2016 New Revision: 232148 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232148=gcc=rev Log: shrink-wrap: Once more PRs 67778, 68634, and now 68909 If a candidate PRE

[Bug lto/69188] New: ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188 Bug ID: 69188 Summary: ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled. Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/69188] ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188 --- Comment #3 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 37260 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37260=edit Source file 2.

[Bug lto/69188] ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188 --- Comment #1 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 37258 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37258=edit Script used to reproduce.

[Bug lto/69188] ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188 --- Comment #2 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 37259 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37259=edit Source file 1.

[Bug c++/69189] New: [concepts] ICE: segmentation fault in instantiate_template_1

sed source attached. This is using 6.0.0 20160107, compiled with: g++-trunk -std=c++1z prepro.ii Error & stacktrace: prepro.ii: In substitution of 'template {anonymous}::any_base::any_base(Value&&) requires predicate( ::no_special_members_interference<::any_base, Value>::value) [wi

[Bug rtl-optimization/68909] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69161] [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/69114] A couple allocator-related helpers should use __addressof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69114 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69082] Final link fails on ARM using lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #9 from Richard

[Bug libstdc++/69106] std::promise should tolerate overloaded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69106 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/68758] [6 Regression] Invalid read of size 8 in gt_pch_save (ggc-common.c:551)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68758 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Ok, so re-running the whole test-suite shows that all Invalid read/write operations related to GGC are gone. I'm going to test the patch and send it to mailing list. Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/67755] [5/6 Regression] Bad edge probability/block freqency for tree jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- It looks like a logic error in the case where we need to make sure there's enough "count" going to the final block of jump thread path. I've got a patch, but I'm still working through the code and the

[Bug tree-optimization/69184] [6 Regression] ICE in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69184 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.4, 5.3.1 Target

[Bug tree-optimization/69169] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69169 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37253 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37253=edit tentative patch

[Bug libstdc++/66284] std::reference_wrapper is transparent to std::function::target_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66284 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/69188] ICE when linking objects at different optimization levels with LTO and profile generation enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188 --- Comment #6 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com --- With the gcc-6-20160103 snapshot the line in lto-symtab.c changes from 143 to 119: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto/lto-symtab.c:119 Please submit a full bug

[Bug other/61439] contrib/download_prerequisites script does not verify integrity of packages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439 --- Comment #2 from daube --- Hi all, I've implemented checksum verification using the sha512sums published with prerequisite tarballs on gcc.gnu.org. Please find the patch attached to this ticket. This would be my first contribution to GCC,

[Bug target/69175] [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/69145] [6 Regression] Bogus 'warning: #pragma implementation for ‘...’ appears after file is included'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69145 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 8 06:43:31 2016 New Revision: 232150 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232150=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69145 * files.c (cpp_included_before): If IS_ADHOC_LOC

[Bug fortran/69128] [4.9/5/6 Regression] OpenMP workshare problem with SUM()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 8 06:45:18 2016 New Revision: 232151 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232151=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/69128 * trans.h (OMPWS_SCALARIZER_BODY): Define.

[Bug libstdc++/69191] New: Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 Bug ID: 69191 Summary: Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/69175] [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/69190] New: FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/uses_allocator.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69190 Bug ID: 69190 Summary: FAIL: experimental/type_erased_allocator/uses_allocator.cc Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69145] [6 Regression] Bogus 'warning: #pragma implementation for ‘...’ appears after file is included'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69145 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69128] [4.9/5 Regression] OpenMP workshare problem with SUM()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] OpenMP |[4.9/5 Regression] OpenMP

[Bug middle-end/68983] [6 Regression] ICE: in store_field, at expr.c:6659

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/52162] Bogus -fcheck=bounds with realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||townsend at astro dot wisc.edu

[Bug fortran/69185] bounds-check gives false positive on assignment to allocatable array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69185 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Hi Jakub. I thought it was simply matter of using location_of instead of DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION as I did in other places in that patch set, but in fact it doesn't work, in order to avoid the spurious warning a

[Bug ipa/69044] [6 regression] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69185] bounds-check gives false positive on assignment to allocatable array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69185 --- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > It looks like a duplicate of pr52162. Unless you object I'll mark this PRas > a duplicate in the coming days. Agreed!

[Bug target/69176] [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #7) > > > I think the problem is the constraints on *add3_pluslong allows all > > > immediates. > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here - there are 4 constraints that should

[Bug c++/69125] [6 regression] Please don't print "‘visibility’ attribute ignored" when setting hidden visibility for anonymous namespace classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69125 --- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira --- I'll be happy if the pragma issue is fixed, since then I can just inject the _Pragma into the macro and make the problem go away.

[Bug fortran/69185] New: bounds-check gives false positive on assignment to allocatable array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69185 Bug ID: 69185 Summary: bounds-check gives false positive on assignment to allocatable array Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) [...snip...] > That said, the location of the token from _Pragma looks wrong; note the > underlines here: > > Breakpoint 2, handle_pragma_diagnostic (dummy=) at >

[Bug target/1078] Problems with attributes documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078 --- Comment #13 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Jan 7 18:02:25 2016 New Revision: 232136 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232136=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-07 Sandra Loosemore PR 1078

[Bug target/1078] Problems with attributes documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078 --- Comment #14 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've finished going through the target-specific attributes. I filed new target-specific issues for things that need attention from target maintainers: PR 69151: h8300 "OS_Task", "monitor" PR

[Bug c++/69125] [6 regression] Please don't print "‘visibility’ attribute ignored" when setting hidden visibility for anonymous namespace classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69125 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- As far as I can tell: * _Pragma is handled by _cpp_do__Pragma which injects pragma tokens into the token stream * the resulting "ignore" pragmas are handled by

[Bug rtl-optimization/69161] [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/69161] [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #4) > Ok, judging from this my simplistic patch from > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00329.html > is not appropriate I think so. Also note that the

  1   2   >