[Bug c++/70447] delete operator not called when destructor throws.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70447 programmerjake at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||programmerjake at gmail

[Bug c++/70447] New: delete operator not called when destructor throws.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70447 Bug ID: 70447 Summary: delete operator not called when destructor throws. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5/6 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #30 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Mar 30 03:57:30 2016 New Revision: 234545 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234545=gcc=rev Log: PR target/63890 * config/i386/i386.h (ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS):

[Bug c++/70446] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus), probably related to vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70446 --- Comment #4 from ivanbili at gmail dot com --- The bug does NOT happen on my other computer with the following version of gcc: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.3.0/lto-wrapper

[Bug c++/70403] A null pointer check removed with -O2 even with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70403 --- Comment #8 from Hadula, Tomasz --- When I compile with devirtualization disabled (i.e. with -fno-devirtualize) the null pointer check is where it was supposed to be. Any clue why?

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b7.10110111 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/70441] vector<__float128> crashes on two push_back calls with -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70441 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/70052] [5/6 Regression] ICE compiling _Decimal128 test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70446] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus), probably related to vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70446 --- Comment #3 from ivanbili at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 38125 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38125=edit Correct code that compiles with clang

[Bug bootstrap/70420] (Building GCC) mtune=native and internal compiler error at emit-rtl.c:1027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70420 --- Comment #3 from Seth Junot --- The preprocessed *.i file is attached. It was located at [builddir]/x86_64-apple-darwin15.3.0/libquadmath/rem_pio2q.i There was second file at x86_64-apple-darwin15.3.0/i386/libquadmath/rem_pio2q.i From the

[Bug bootstrap/70420] (Building GCC) mtune=native and internal compiler error at emit-rtl.c:1027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70420 --- Comment #2 from Seth Junot --- Created attachment 38124 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38124=edit Preprocessed file during libquadmath compilation

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 --- Comment #39 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Domani Hannes from comment #37) > With the new patch there is still a warning with this example: > === 8< === > int f(void); > > int test(void) > { > int baz[4]; >

[Bug c++/70446] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus), probably related to vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70446 --- Comment #2 from ivanbili at gmail dot com --- If looks like commenting #include // std::sort out makes the compiler not crash.

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 --- Comment #38 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Mar 30 00:55:00 2016 New Revision: 234544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234544=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/59124 (bogus -Warray-bounds warning) gcc/ChangeLog:

[Bug c++/70446] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus), probably related to vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70446 --- Comment #1 from ivanbili at gmail dot com --- Also happens if I fix the errors. I.e. replace vector[i].ratio = (float)values[i]/weights[i]; vector[i].weight = weights[i]; with: helper[i].ratio = (float)values[i]/weights[i];

[Bug c++/70446] New: g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus), probably related to vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70446 Bug ID: 70446 Summary: g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus), probably related to vectors Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70052] [5/6 Regression] ICE compiling _Decimal128 test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Wed Mar 30 00:36:36 2016 New Revision: 234543 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234543=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] PR70052, ICE compiling _Decimal128 test case gcc/ PR target/70052

[Bug target/70359] [6 Regression] Code size increase for ARM compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #14 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #13) > The change to the assignment of p_22 is made by forwprop1. > > It does create a situation where p_2 is live outside the loop and hides the > CSE

[Bug c++/70445] New: Incorrect C++ member alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70445 Bug ID: 70445 Summary: Incorrect C++ member alignment Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/70444] New: Optimizer removes expression template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70444 Bug ID: 70444 Summary: Optimizer removes expression template Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I'd consider it a bug that the existing -Wparentheses warning for ambiguous "else" doesn't warn in this case. As with the existing warning, that warning is only appropriate when there is

[Bug other/70428] -fdebug-prefix-map did not support to remap sources with relative path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70428 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I don't think -fdebug-prefix-map is meant to cover this case; you're meant to use it with paths in the form in which they appear in debug info, which means passing such an option with the

[Bug lto/70283] [6 regression] bogus vtable mismatch warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70283 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/70442] [6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "extract_insn"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70442 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug jit/70443] New: gccjit fails to build with in-tree dependencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70443 Bug ID: 70443 Summary: gccjit fails to build with in-tree dependencies Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug tree-optimization/70442] New: gcc ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "extract_insn"

efix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160329 (experimental) [trunk revision 234517] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -m32 -O2 abc.c abc.c: In function ‘fn1’: abc.c:11:1: error: unrecognizable insn: } ^ (insn 17 16

[Bug lto/70289] [openacc] ICE in input_varpool_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289 --- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38122 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38122=edit c test case This test cases is failing for a couple of reasons. First, the reduction variable doesn't have

[Bug c++/70441] vector<__float128> crashes on two push_back calls with -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70441 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- C++ does not support dynamic allocation of over-aligned types (usually SIMD vectors, but also __float128 on x86 for instance). C++17 will partially support it (operator new), but still not fix the std::vector

[Bug c++/70441] New: vector<__float128> crashes on two push_back calls with -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70441 Bug ID: 70441 Summary: vector<__float128> crashes on two push_back calls with -mavx Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/70283] [6 regression] bogus vtable mismatch warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70283 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Mar 29 19:37:55 2016 New Revision: 234532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234532=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/70283 * ipa-devirt.c (methods_equal_p): New function.

[Bug tree-optimization/70405] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70405 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70429] Wrong code with -O1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 6+ so far.

[Bug bootstrap/70422] [6 regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70422 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 38121 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38121=edit patch on top of the original patch (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > Presumably the C++ FE should

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 --- Comment #37 from Domani Hannes --- With the new patch there is still a warning with this example: === 8< === int f(void); int test(void) { int baz[4]; int q = 0; int d, i, j, sum; for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {

[Bug rtl-optimization/70429] Wrong code with -O1.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 29 18:49:00 2016 New Revision: 234531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234531=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/70429 * combine.c (simplify_shift_const_1): For

[Bug c++/70353] [5 regression] ICE on __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 regression] ICE on |[5 regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/70353] [5/6 regression] ICE on __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 29 18:40:02 2016 New Revision: 234530 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234530=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70353 gcc/ * tree-inline.c (remap_decls): Don't

[Bug c++/68475] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in merge_exception_specifiers, at cp/typeck2.c:2115 with -fno-exceptions on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68475 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt --- I suspect what broke it was git revision 0375a27521885.

[Bug c++/69487] Unexpected VLA initialization of char[] from ""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69487 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.9.3, 5.3.0, 6.0 --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 Bug 16994 depends on bug 70440, which changed state. Bug 70440 Summary: SEGV initializing a VLA with a smaller string https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70440 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/69487] Unexpected VLA initialization of char[] from ""

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69487 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/70440] SEGV initializing a VLA with a smaller string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70440 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70440] New: SEGV initializing a VLA with a smaller string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70440 Bug ID: 70440 Summary: SEGV initializing a VLA with a smaller string Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/70439] New: Incorrect DRAP check in ix86_expand_epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70439 Bug ID: 70439 Summary: Incorrect DRAP check in ix86_expand_epilogue Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/70405] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70405 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 29 17:33:52 2016 New Revision: 234529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234529=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/70405 * ssa-iterators.h (num_imm_uses): Add

[Bug c++/70438] result type of vector operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70438 --- Comment #2 from Mike Herrick --- I think that's fine -- a note in the documentation to that effect (describing what an "opaque" vector type is and what operations are allowed on it) should suffice. Thanks.

[Bug c++/70438] result type of vector operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70438 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- The result of a comparison is an "opaque" vector type, which can be converted much more freely than a regular vector type, in case the guessed return type doesn't exactly match the user's choice (it quickly

[Bug fortran/70235] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect output with PF format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle --- Dominiq, I have tested as much as I can with several variations of values of the float and all looks good. I am ready to approve your patch when you are.

[Bug fortran/70397] [5/6 Regression] ice while allocating ultimate polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70397 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Waiting one week for any new regressions introduced by this patch.

[Bug fortran/70397] [5/6 Regression] ice while allocating ultimate polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70397 --- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Tue Mar 29 16:54:24 2016 New Revision: 234528 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234528=gcc=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2016-03-29 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug rtl-optimization/68695] [6 Regression] Performance regression related to ssa patch / ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69890] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/chkp-* on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69890 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/chkp-strlen-1.c 2016-01-20 > 19:08:43.0 +0100 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/chkp-strlen-1.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/68695] [6 Regression] Performance regression related to ssa patch / ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695 --- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Mar 29 16:20:39 2016 New Revision: 234527 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234527=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-29 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug target/70359] [6 Regression] Code size increase for ARM compared to gcc-5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law --- The change to the assignment of p_22 is made by forwprop1. It does create a situation where p_2 is live outside the loop and hides the CSE opportunity, which may be the cause of the more significant

[Bug c++/70438] New: result type of vector operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70438 Bug ID: 70438 Summary: result type of vector operations Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/69890] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/chkp-* on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69890 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The problem is that some string functions are defined as inline functions > using *_chk function variants. object_sizes pass transforms *_chk call > into original function call in a regular case

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/70355] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in simplify_subreg_concatn, at lower-subreg.c:617 with -funroll-loops -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70355 --- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Tue Mar 29 15:19:00 2016 New Revision: 234524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234524=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/70355 * lower-subreg.c (simplify_subreg_concatn): Reject

[Bug libstdc++/70437] New: [6 Regression] Instantiation loop with pair and is_constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70437 Bug ID: 70437 Summary: [6 Regression] Instantiation loop with pair and is_constructible Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70355] [5 Regression] ICE: in simplify_subreg_concatn, at lower-subreg.c:617 with -funroll-loops -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70355 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Summary|[5/6

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17) > > I'm now testing this patch on sh-elf... The GCC testsuite results look OK. However, CSiBE shows sum: 3342539 -> 3351695+9156 / +0.273924 % which is not

[Bug c/70436] -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- BTW according to a working implementation of this -Wdangling-else warning (not the above broken one I prematurely posted), the only suspicious use of dangling else (i.e. a use in which the indentation is

[Bug c++/55914] [C++11] Pack expansion fails in lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55914 Jaak Ristioja changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jaak at ristioja dot ee --- Comment #9

[Bug c++/68724] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ice in unify, at cp/pt.c:19902

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/69890] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/chkp-* on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69890 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/64177] Various cilk+ testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/64177] Various cilk+ testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Tue Mar 29 14:39:33 2016 New Revision: 234523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234523=gcc=rev Log: [PR testsuite/64177] Audit Cilk Plus tests for CILK_NWORKERS=1 PR

[Bug testsuite/64177] Various cilk+ testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177 --- Comment #2 from iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Actually, only 3 tests require 2+ workers (they fail with export CILK_NWORKERS=1): FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawning_arg.c FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/steal_check.c FAIL:

[Bug testsuite/64177] Various cilk+ testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70434] [5/6 Regression] adding an extraneous cast to vector type results in inferior code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70434 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/70436] -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- Turns out the prototype is pretty broken :P

[Bug target/67591] ARM v8 Thumb IT blocks deprecated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67591 --- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang --- *** Bug 69256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/69256] Need to get rid of "Warning: IT blocks containing 32-bit Thumb instructions are deprecated in ARMv8"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69256 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70393] [5/6 Regression] Miscompilation: missing constructor call for static object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70434] [5/6 Regression] adding an extraneous cast to vector type results in inferior code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70434 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/69614] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/70434] [5/6 Regression] adding an extraneous cast to vector type results in inferior code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70434 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Mar 29 13:32:37 2016 New Revision: 234522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234522=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][4.9 Backport] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expansion

[Bug c/70436] -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Thanks. I could take care of the C FE side ;). But let's strike this in the next stage1.

[Bug middle-end/70434] [5/6 Regression] adding an extraneous cast to vector type results in inferior code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70434 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69875] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong barrier placement for 64-bit atomic loads on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69875 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Mar 29 13:28:34 2016 New Revision: 234521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234521=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][5 Backport] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expansion

[Bug c/70436] -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka --- Here's a prototype that seems to do the job. Whenever we see an unbraced if, increment the counter. Whenever we see a compound statement, reset the counter. Whenever we see an else, warn if counter > 1

[Bug c/70436] -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/70436] -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/70422] [6 regression] Bootstrap comparison failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70422 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Presumably the C++ FE should have set DECL_IGNORED_P on the fname decl.

[Bug c/70436] -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note clang warns here: pr70405-3.c:11:3: warning: add explicit braces to avoid dangling else [-Wdangling-else] else ^ and it warns regardless of the indentation.

[Bug c/70436] New: -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 Bug ID: 70436 Summary: -Wmisleading-indentation missing warning Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/70397] [5/6 Regression] ice while allocating ultimate polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70397 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/70405] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70405 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/70407] alignment of array elements is greater than element size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70407 --- Comment #2 from Dehuan Xin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed as a documentation issue. Note that > > typedef struct S_ { short f[3] __attribute((aligned(8))); } S; > > works (and increases sizeof (S_)). So for

[Bug c/70418] VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations within nested function definition ices.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Even r104500 ICEs. But gcc34 compiles it fine: $ gcc34 q.c -c q.c: In function `main': q.c:4: warning: structure defined inside parms q.c:4: warning: anonymous struct declared inside parameter list q.c:4:

[Bug c/70418] VM structure type specifier in list of parameter declarations within nested function definition ices.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70435] New: section attribute of a function template is not honored.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70435 Bug ID: 70435 Summary: section attribute of a function template is not honored. Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/70424] [4.9/5 Regression] Pointer derived from integer gets reduced alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70424 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/70424] [4.9/5 Regression] Pointer derived from integer gets reduced alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70424 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.5, 6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6

[Bug middle-end/70424] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Pointer derived from integer gets reduced alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70424 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 29 12:36:39 2016 New Revision: 234517 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234517=gcc=rev Log: 2016-03-29 Richard Biener PR middle-end/70424

  1   2   >