[Bug tree-optimization/68797] gcc -m32 does not finish when compiling test cases from PR66070

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68797 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Does this still happen?

[Bug c++/69772] enum class bool comparison error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69772 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug target/69832] internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69832 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Depends on|

[Bug c++/72801] ICE on invalid C++ code with ill-formed class member specialization: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3521

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72801 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/72802] powerpc64le: -mcpu=power9 emits lxssp instruction with offset that isn't a multiple of 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/72801] ICE on invalid C++ code with ill-formed class member specialization: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3521

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72801 --- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > I can confirm the ICE but not the regression part. My bisection script > shows an ICE goes all the way back to 4.3.0. The first revision I have > access to that

[Bug c/72783] Fortify scanf %s, %[ conversion specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/72802] New: powerpc64le: -mcpu=power9 emits lxssp instruction with offset that isn't a multiple of 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802 Bug ID: 72802 Summary: powerpc64le: -mcpu=power9 emits lxssp instruction with offset that isn't a multiple of 4 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/72801] ICE on invalid C++ code with ill-formed class member specialization: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3521

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72801 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/72797] bogus -Wmisleading-indentation with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on a multi-statement macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72797 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 is set in a number of tests that define helper macros to help reduce clutter from repetitive constructs. Without the setting, diagnostic messages in these tests would point to the

[Bug c++/72801] New: ICE on invalid C++ code with ill-formed class member specialization: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3521

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72801 Bug ID: 72801 Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code with ill-formed class member specialization: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type) in

[Bug c++/72800] New: ICE on invalid C++14 code with initialized lambda capture: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in add_capture, at cp/lambda.c:505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800 Bug ID: 72800 Summary: ICE on invalid C++14 code with initialized lambda capture: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in add_capture, at

[Bug middle-end/70920] if ((intptr_t)ptr == 0) doesn't get simplified to if (ptr == 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70920 --- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to mwahab from comment #4) > (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #3) > > Fixed on trunk. > > I think that this is the cause of a failure in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr22051-2.c >

[Bug c/72797] bogus -Wmisleading-indentation with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on a multi-statement macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72797 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/72798] Module (.mod) file changes even when interface does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72798 --- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend --- Hmm, I can understand why having an internal pure attribute makes sense from an optimiser point of view. But it results in having lots of compilation cascades during debugging, which sucks. Is there a way

[Bug fortran/72798] Module (.mod) file changes even when interface does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72798 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/72799] [C++11] ref-qualifiers are dropped from some function types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72799 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva --- Uhh, sorry, I pasted the error messages from a compiler with changes that attempted to fix the problem. Here's what gcc version 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6) (GCC) reports:

[Bug c++/72799] New: [C++11] ref-qualifiers are dropped from some function types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72799 Bug ID: 72799 Summary: [C++11] ref-qualifiers are dropped from some function types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/72798] New: Module (.mod) file changes even when interface does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72798 Bug ID: 72798 Summary: Module (.mod) file changes even when interface does not Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug web/60933] Please do not advertise outdated version of gmp, mpfr, mpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60933 --- Comment #15 from Leif Leonhardy --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > Fixed. In trunk that is. In GCC 6.1.0 we still have $ egrep -iw 'gmp|mpfr|mpc' src/gcc-6.1.0/contrib/download_prerequisites MPFR=mpfr-2.4.2

[Bug middle-end/72795] Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 --- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes --- Based on further discussion (http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/119045/discussion-between-a3f-and-peter-cordes), the only bug (or feature?) here is that asm("":::"memory") doesn't count as a reference for

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 --- Comment #23 from PeteVine --- > updating URL to latest 1.4.8 version. Can you please check that the problem > is still reproducible? Thanks, forgot to mention my last reproduction used 1.4.6 source.

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Aug 3 19:05:45 2016 New Revision: 239092 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239092=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-03 Bernd Edlinger PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/72778] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Aug 3 18:54:49 2016 New Revision: 239091 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239091=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-03 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug middle-end/72795] Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 --- Comment #2 from Ahmad Fatoum --- The write that can't be optimized away is the final assignment to x. The `movl$1, x(%rip)` prior to the barrier should've been optimized out, IMO.

[Bug middle-end/72795] Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/72778] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) Hi, Uros. Thanks for reporting this. It was my mistake that I did not check bootstrap with GO. I am going to fix it soon. > Before the patch, register

[Bug c/72797] New: bogus -Wmisleading-indentation with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on a multi-statement macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72797 Bug ID: 72797 Summary: bogus -Wmisleading-indentation with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on a multi-statement macro Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/72759] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, tree_class_check, ocp_convert)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72759 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/72796] [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- markus@x4 js % cat jsarray.ii struct a; template struct b { typedef a c; }; struct d { void e(int); }; struct a : d { void e(int) = delete; }; template struct g : b::c { g(int) { this->d::e(0);

[Bug c++/71748] [5 Regression] ICE on valid (?) C++ template code invoking a base destructor: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71748 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- *** Bug 70616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/70616] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72796] New: [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796 Bug ID: 72796 Summary: [7 Regression] Firefox build error: use of deleted function Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/72795] New: Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795 Bug ID: 72795 Summary: Missed optimization of external-linkage variables in presence of barriers Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/71978] -mrealignstack and the unwinder

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71978 Rian Quinn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65033] C++11 atomics: is_lock_free result does not always match the real lock-free property

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, torvald at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > The difference is unfortunate, but C11 specifies that atomic_is_lock_free is > *per object*. I suppose that any change there would

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Yes, this option cures CF. Does it mean that we must compile spec2000 with this flag? 2016-08-03 19:08 GMT+03:00 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org : >

[Bug c/72783] Fortify scanf %s, %[ conversion specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783 --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- Martin and I discussed this for a bit. The %ms hack does not work due to embedded NULs, which are copied to the destination buffer by scanf, do not terminate the string, and are (in most cases) detectable

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #13) > I think it was poc_ref_pic_reorder() in slice.c that triggered the ICE. I > don't know if the original code shows the vectorization reduction problem.

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you try with -std=gnu90 and see if that fixes the issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #13 from Jim Wilson --- I think it was poc_ref_pic_reorder() in slice.c that triggered the ICE. I don't know if the original code shows the vectorization reduction problem. That might only be present in the reduced testcase.

[Bug c/72794] New: [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794 Bug ID: 72794 Summary: [7 regression'] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/71815] SLSR misses several PHI candidate cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- I have a prototype that fixes this in the obvious way and it causes both slsr-35.c and slsr-36.c to pass again without turning off code hoisting. I'll do a regstrap and then work on some benchmark testing.

[Bug target/70677] Suboptimal cond on AVR: unneeded stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70677 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Aug 3 15:46:11 2016 New Revision: 239080 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239080=gcc=rev Log: PR 70677 * common/config/avr/avr-common.c

[Bug middle-end/70920] if ((intptr_t)ptr == 0) doesn't get simplified to if (ptr == 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70920 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/72790] MOVE_ALLOC() of character looses content data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72790 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/72791] Internal compiler error for reshape intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72791 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Patrick Seewald from comment #0) > I get an internal compiler error (Segmentation fault) when compiling the > following program > > program reshape_bug >integer, dimension(2) ::

[Bug tree-optimization/69848] poor vectorization of a loop from SPEC2006 464.h264ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848 --- Comment #12 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Jim, May I ask which function in h264ref also shows this issue? I instrumented GCC and could not found a case in it. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #5 from martin --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, ranjan.winner at gmail dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 > > > > --- Comment #2 from martin --- > > (In

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-12-23 00:00:00 |2016-8-3 --- Comment #22 from Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/72772] Missed SCEV after pass reordering@236440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/72792] New: allocator_traits is too strict about rebinding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72792 Bug ID: 72792 Summary: allocator_traits is too strict about rebinding Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/72793] New: pointer_traits is too strict about rebinding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72793 Bug ID: 72793 Summary: pointer_traits is too strict about rebinding Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, ranjan.winner at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 > > --- Comment #2 from martin --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)

[Bug tree-optimization/72772] Missed SCEV after pass reordering@236440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- The patch has quite some fallout, including ICEs and wrong-code :/ FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/pr71403-1.c -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/pr35356-1.c scan-tree-dump graphite "if (P_9 >=

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #3 from martin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its > documentation. Hi Richard, Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this. Here is

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 --- Comment #2 from martin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its > documentation. Hi Richard, Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this. Here is

[Bug fortran/72791] New: Internal compiler error for reshape intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72791 Bug ID: 72791 Summary: Internal compiler error for reshape intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/72699] [6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.c:1257

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72699 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/72786] Odd spelling suggestion with later defined macro: Suggestion is identical to unknown identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72786 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this. A two-liner fix for this would be to detect in best_match::get_best_meaningful_candidate if m_best_distance is 0, and if so return NULL, i.e. to not give a suggestion if

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://te4.org/dl/t-engine/ |http://te4.org/dl/t-engine/

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 --- Comment #20 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to PeteVine from comment #19) > Here's what I've been doing to arrive at that profile-use crash: > > In the unpacked archive's top-level directory (see URL), edit premake4.lua Can you please

[Bug rtl-optimization/71984] [7 Regression] wrong code with -O -mavx512cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71984 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/72790] New: MOVE_ALLOC() of character looses content data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72790 Bug ID: 72790 Summary: MOVE_ALLOC() of character looses content data Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/58250] -fprofile-use causes: "warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays is not supported with -Os"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58250 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72775] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/72779] ice when compiling included lambda pattern (internal compiler error: in is_base_type, at dwarf2out.c:9968)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72779 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72789] New: add -Wunused-private-field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72789 Bug ID: 72789 Summary: add -Wunused-private-field Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Needs -O3 -mcpu=power9 -mno-lra, and a binutils that supports power9, to fail. Same on BE as on LE.

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug regression/67288] [4.9 regression] non optimal simple function (useless additional shift/remove/shift/add)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/72788] New: Stack unwinding fails since GCC 4.9 on i686 without -fexceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72788 Bug ID: 72788 Summary: Stack unwinding fails since GCC 4.9 on i686 without -fexceptions Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/72778] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:451

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72778 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/72415] [6/7 regression][concepts] ICE in satisfy_predicate_constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72415 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Started with r238558.

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/71824] [6/7 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite loop optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |6.2

[Bug c++/72415] [7 regression][concepts] ICE in satisfy_predicate_constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72415 --- Comment #2 from lucdanton at free dot fr --- I completely failed to make note that this used to compile on GCC 6.1, too (modulo the missing definition, again).

[Bug tree-optimization/72787] New: Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787 Bug ID: 72787 Summary: Query related to gcc-4_6-branch fix for Bug-49279 (Getting issue with __restrict type qualifier) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/65151] [SH] Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/72764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code instantiating an alias template: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in typedef_variant_p, at tree.c:126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/72707] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] local anonymous union member hides names in the same scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72707 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/72714] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_array_init_size, at fortran/trans-array.c:5235

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/72763] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 code that instantiates a non-template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/72786] New: Odd spelling suggestion with later defined macro: Suggestion is identical to unknown identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72786 Bug ID: 72786 Summary: Odd spelling suggestion with later defined macro: Suggestion is identical to unknown identifier Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/71860] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71784] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #13 from Richard

[Bug c++/71827] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with non constant diff between two labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71827 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71861] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71795] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Two Bugs in array constructors (optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/71762] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/71575] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |6.2 Summary|[4.9/6/7

[Bug c++/71748] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on valid (?) C++ template code invoking a base destructor: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71748 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71747] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with misuse of overloaded operator '()': Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71747 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/71737] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71723] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE with attempted pointer initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/71703] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.5 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener

  1   2   3   4   5   >