[Bug c/77690] -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/65682] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on mips64el target in libgcc "_mulvdi3.o"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65682 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77702] suffix or operands invalid for `movq'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77702 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c/77702] New: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77702 Bug ID: 77702 Summary: suffix or operands invalid for `movq' Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/77696] Confusing wording for -Wformat-length=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77696 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/77695] [7 Regression] bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/61175] LIM not pulling out non-aliased non-depednent load and stores (outside of loop bounds)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61175 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/61839] More optimize opportunity for VRP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65424] gcc does not recognize byte swaps implemented as loop.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65424 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/65682] bootstrap failure of gcc-4.9.2 on mips64el target in libgcc "_mulvdi3.o"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65682 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/77695] [7 Regression] bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug bootstrap/77695] [7 Regression] bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug go/77701] suspicious code in go/go-gcc.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77701 Chris Manghane changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 --- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #6) > The test case 176.gcc in the spec2000 benchmarks still fails apparently with > the same error even after 240352 > > (this is with 240383) > > loop.c:

[Bug go/77701] New: suspicious code in go/go-gcc.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77701 Bug ID: 77701 Summary: suspicious code in go/go-gcc.cc Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug c++/77700] New: suspicios code in cp/parser.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77700 Bug ID: 77700 Summary: suspicios code in cp/parser.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug preprocessor/77699] New: suspicious code in get_next_line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77699 Bug ID: 77699 Summary: suspicious code in get_next_line Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] New: Loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 Bug ID: 77698 Summary: Loop not considered hot after profiling Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/77676] powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |bootstrap --- Comment #16 from Martin

[Bug target/77676] powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Sep 22 21:28:07 2016 New Revision: 240383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240383=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77676 - powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail

[Bug tree-optimization/77697] New: suspicious code in tree-ssa-forwprop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77697 Bug ID: 77697 Summary: suspicious code in tree-ssa-forwprop.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/77693] ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

missing unitialized variable warning

I think I have observed a bug in the reporting of uninitialized variables using -Wall . As an example, this small program does not report any warnings: #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int v1[1]; int *v2 = new int; printf("%d\n", v1[0]); *v2 = 1; } Why not? An almost

[Bug fortran/77694] ICE in optimize_binop_array_assignment, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug bootstrap/77695] x86_64 bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68212] Loop unroller breaks basic block frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68212 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/77696] New: Confusing wording for -Wformat-length=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77696 Bug ID: 77696 Summary: Confusing wording for -Wformat-length= Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug bootstrap/77695] New: x86_64 bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695 Bug ID: 77695 Summary: x86_64 bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77694] ICE in optimize_binop_array_assignment, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/60352] [C++11] Bogus "error: conflicting declaration 'auto i'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60352 --- Comment #2 from Giuseppe Ottaviano --- It still happens in GCC 7: https://godbolt.org/g/GgyCZn

[Bug c++/60352] [C++11] Bogus "error: conflicting declaration 'auto i'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60352 Giuseppe Ottaviano changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ott at fb dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/61019] ICE: incomplete type of class template as pseudo-destructor-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61019] ICE: incomplete type of class template as pseudo-destructor-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 22 17:11:33 2016 New Revision: 240380 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240380=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-22 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug fortran/77694] ICE in optimize_binop_array_assignment, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- For completeness, older official releases give : $ gfortran-6 -O2 z1.f90 z1.f90:4:7: y = .nt. x 1 Error: Unknown operator 'nt' at (1) (null):0:

[Bug c++/61019] ICE: incomplete type of class template as pseudo-destructor-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Fixed for 6.1.0. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug fortran/77694] New: ICE in optimize_binop_array_assignment, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:1080

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694 Bug ID: 77694 Summary: ICE in optimize_binop_array_assignment, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:1080 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77693] ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Some other variants : $ cat z2.f90 program p complex, pointer :: a complex :: z data a /(1.,2.)/ z = a print *, z end $ cat z3.f90 program p

[Bug fortran/77693] New: ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693 Bug ID: 77693 Summary: ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The differences between r234749 and the one before it start in 032t.esra: --- good/wrong.cpp.032t.esra2016-09-22 17:41:24.914598329 +0100 +++ bad/wrong.cpp.032t.esra 2016-09-22

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- A slightly adjusted testcase is: #include #include struct C { void doCb () { size_t dummy_a = 1; std::cout << ""; auto tmp = this; std::function f; f =

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/57466] [DR 1584] Argument deduction fails for 'const T*' when T is function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71979] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with on C++ code with incorrect type in overloaded base class '=' operator: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71979 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71979] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with on C++ code with incorrect type in overloaded base class '=' operator: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71979 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 22 16:14:20 2016 New Revision: 240376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240376=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-09-22 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug preprocessor/77672] wrong rich location in warning: writing a terminating nul past the end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I think the general improvement I'm suggesting is to be able to put the tilde(s) under or point the caret at any character of the format string, including either of the two quotes. It's already possible to

[Bug debug/77692] [7 regression] gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2b.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77692 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) > Btw., the { dg-do compile { target i386*-*-* } } is quite strange: e.g. on > Solaris/x86, the test is still run with -m32 and -m64 for a 32-bit compiler, > while on

[Bug c++/71979] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with on C++ code with incorrect type in overloaded base class '=' operator: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71979 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 22 15:26:23 2016 New Revision: 240373 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240373=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-09-22 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug middle-end/77672] wrong rich location in warning: writing a terminating nul past the end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/62258] [4.9/5 Regression] uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely --- For the record, the 4.8.3 regression was introduced by r207131 and the 4.7.4 regression by r208991, with the fixes for PR 41174 and PR 59224. The fix should apply cleanly and be safe for the 4.7 and 4.8

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Presumably caused by r240187 or r240192

[Bug target/77676] powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug debug/77692] [7 regression] gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2b.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77692 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Presumably caused by r240187 or r240192 I think I had r240187 (or a slightly earlier variant thereof) in my r240175 tree when bootstrapping

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think that means malloc is not returning memory suitably aligned for max_align_t.

[Bug debug/77692] [7 regression] gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2b.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77692 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug debug/77692] New: [7 regression] gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2b.c FAILs

: debug Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: i386-pc-solaris2.12 Target: i386-pc-solaris2.12 Build: i386-pc-solaris2.12 Between 20160916 and 20160922, gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [7 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libstdc++/77691] New: [7 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

20160916 and 20160922, experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc started to FAIL on 32-bit Solaris 12/x86 (not yet tried on S10 or S11), S12/SPARC is fine: FAIL: experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc execution test Assertion failed: aligned(p), file /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to morandidodo from comment #8) > Actually, I tried it, but it does not seem to work. Indeed, using > -mveclibabi=svml -lsvml -I(path-to-intel-lib-dir) does not seem to change > the call address. If

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #8 from morandidodo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > (In reply to morandidodo from comment #6) > > > However, I just made some tests, and it seems that the performance lost is > > particularly related

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to morandidodo from comment #6) > However, I just made some tests, and it seems that the performance lost is > particularly related to std::log. If something else is being used, like > std::sqrt for

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77676] powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676 --- Comment #13 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #10) > Created attachment 39670 [details] > Patch under test. With this patch, i?86-unknown-freebsd11 is back in bootstrap land again.

[Bug ipa/77653] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/77653] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Sep 22 12:52:09 2016 New Revision: 240354 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240354=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR ipa/77653 PR ipa/77653 * gcc.dg/ipa/pr77653.c: New test.

[Bug tree-optimization/77665] [5/6 Regression] ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c:172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/77679] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_array_ctor_reference, at gimple-fold.c:5586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- > Author: rguenth > Date: Thu Sep 22 12:16:42 2016 > New Revision: 240353 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240353=gcc=rev > Log: > 2016-09-22 Richard Biener > > PR

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Somewhat mitigated but it is bound to happen again (the IL is not TREE_OVERFLOW clean) -> fix IPA propagation.

[Bug fortran/77679] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_array_ctor_reference, at gimple-fold.c:5586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/77678] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:13706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code | --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 22 12:16:12 2016 New Revision: 240352 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240352=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-22 Richard Biener PR middle-end/77677

[Bug fortran/77678] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:13706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 22 12:15:38 2016 New Revision: 240351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240351=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-22 Richard Biener PR middle-end/77678

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #6 from morandidodo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > First of all you need to make sure to have recent glibc installed to benefit > from > the vectorized math routines therein. Otherwise we cannot

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2) > > Clang is pretty impressive using libc++ and -Ofast: > > Looks like they can remove all stores from

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Sep 22 11:26:59 2016 New Revision: 240349 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240349=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-22 Paul Thomas PR fortran/48298 *

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2) > Clang is pretty impressive using libc++ and -Ofast: Looks like they can remove all stores from the loop. Though it does not remove the empty loop

[Bug tree-optimization/77665] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c:172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 22 11:17:24 2016 New Revision: 240348 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240348=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/77665 * tree-inline.c (remap_gimple_stmt): Set

[Bug c/77690] New: -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690 Bug ID: 77690 Summary: -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Walter Spector from comment #18) > Awesome! > > I have noticed one bug so far. The compiler is missing a check to see if > the arguments in the I/O procedures have the 'optional' attribute. It

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] New: Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 Bug ID: 77689 Summary: Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug go/77688] [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on mips*-linux-gnu and sparc*-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77688 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug go/77688] New: [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on mips*-linux-gnu and sparc*-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77688 Bug ID: 77688 Summary: [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on mips*-linux-gnu and sparc*-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/77676] powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The patch should resolve all the issues discussed in this bug. > I don't have access to Darwin so I'd appreciate your help validating it there. The patch restores bootstrap on darwin. Thanks.

[Bug target/77687] New: frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 Bug ID: 77687 Summary: frame access after release without redzone on powerpc Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/53991] _mm_popcnt_u64 fails with -O3 -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991 --- Comment #12 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for reporting that you are affected as well. Regarding your question about bumping the priority, one problem for the TM support in general has been to be able to judge how many users are

[Bug ipa/77653] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |ipa --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška

[Bug target/77686] [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug target/77686] New: [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686 Bug ID: 77686 Summary: [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and arm-linux-gnueabihf Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- #4 0x0189c86e in ipcp_vr_lattice::meet_with_1 (this=0x280a780, other_vr=0x769a3e88) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ipa-cp.c:987 987 vrp_meet (_vr, other_vr); (gdb) l 982

[Bug target/61367] Annoying rtx cost information in middle end dumps on arm/aarch64 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61367 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/77680] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77680 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/77678] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:13706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/77679] [6/7 Regression] ICE in fold_array_ctor_reference, at gimple-fold.c:5586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/77685] rs6000 target has builtin expansion for memcpy but not memcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77685 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/77683] [7 regression] ICE on %lf directive in format_floating in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:1163

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|[7.0

  1   2   >