[Bug c++/65866] Wrong warning when using list-initialization: operation on 'b' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65866 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|6.3

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 --- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #9) > (In reply to kugan from comment #8) > > Author: kugan > > Date: Fri Sep 23 10:25:09 2016 > > New Revision: 240420 > > > > URL:

[Bug lto/77716] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2.c fails starting with r240228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77716 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71109] [6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71109 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- It doesn't fail for me, 6.2.1 20160921 nor 7.0.0 20160914 (experimental).

[Bug tree-optimization/71109] [6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71109 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug go/77688] [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on mips*-linux-gnu and sparc*-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77688 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77717] testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/operations/compare/char/1.cc makes undefined memcmp call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77717 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/77718] New: expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 Bug ID: 77718 Summary: expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Sep 23 20:36:21 2016 New Revision: 240456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240456=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-23 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug target/77685] rs6000 target has builtin expansion for memcpy but not memcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77685 --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- fixed in 240455: 2016-09-23 Aaron Sawdey * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (cmpmemsi): New define_expand. * config/rs6000/rs6000.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/77416] [7 Regression] LRA rematerializing use of CA reg across function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77416 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug libstdc++/77717] New: testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/operations/compare/char/1.cc makes undefined memcmp call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77717 Bug ID: 77717 Summary: testsuite/21_strings/basic_string_view/operations/comp are/char/1.cc makes undefined memcmp call Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/77716] New: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2.c fails starting with r240228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77716 Bug ID: 77716 Summary: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2.c fails starting with r240228 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/77701] suspicious code in go/go-gcc.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77701 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/77714] Wrong code generation for gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77714 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC|bergner at vnet dot ibm.com|bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/77709] specified destination size warning does not work when cross-compiling from 64 host to 32bit target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77709 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug go/77715] New: go-system.h includes C++ header files before GCC system.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77715 Bug ID: 77715 Summary: go-system.h includes C++ header files before GCC system.h Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/77710] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77710 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/77713] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77713 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|middle-end

[Bug go/77701] suspicious code in go/go-gcc.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77701 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Sep 23 17:55:53 2016 New Revision: 240451 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240451=gcc=rev Log: PR go/77701 * go-gcc.cc (Gcc_backend::Gcc_backend): Fix

[Bug middle-end/77713] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77713 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Sep 23 17:55:29 2016 New Revision: 240450 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240450=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR testsuite/77713 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/77714] New: Wrong code generation for gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77714 Bug ID: 77714 Summary: Wrong code generation for gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51447.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/77713] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77713 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56166] std::string::clear() can throw despite being marked noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77582] Improve std::string::clear performace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77582 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/56166] std::string::clear() can throw despite being marked noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56166 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Sep 23 17:25:34 2016 New Revision: 240447 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240447=gcc=rev Log: Avoid reallocation for basic_string::clear() PR libstdc++/56166

[Bug libstdc++/77582] Improve std::string::clear performace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77582 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Sep 23 17:25:34 2016 New Revision: 240447 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240447=gcc=rev Log: Avoid reallocation for basic_string::clear() PR libstdc++/56166

[Bug middle-end/77713] New: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77713 Bug ID: 77713 Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c compilation failed to produce executable Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/77672] wrong rich location in warning: writing a terminating nul past the end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Sep 23 16:55:27 2016 New Revision: 240442 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240442=gcc=rev Log: Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog PR

[Bug middle-end/77708] -Wformat-length %s warns for snprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77708 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/58938] std::exception_ptr is missing on architectures with incomplete atomic int support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- A prototype implementation that doesn't rely on atomics: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01526.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01546.html (both patches are needed).

[Bug tree-optimization/77654] restrict pointer attribute not preserved with -fprefetch-loop-arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77654 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 --- Comment #9 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to kugan from comment #8) > Author: kugan > Date: Fri Sep 23 10:25:09 2016 > New Revision: 240420 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240420=gcc=rev > Log: > Drop TREE_OVERFLOW > >

[Bug tree-optimization/77654] restrict pointer attribute not preserved with -fprefetch-loop-arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77654 --- Comment #4 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpf Date: Fri Sep 23 15:48:01 2016 New Revision: 240439 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240439=gcc=rev Log: Ensure points-to information is maintained for prefetch. gcc/ PR

[Bug c++/77712] int() is incorrectly treated as a null pointer constant in C++11 and later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77712 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/77711] Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- And then if the function we're calling is a member function we get another variation: struct A { int foo(); int foo() const; void bar(int); }; int main() { A a; a.bar( a.foo ); } foo.cc: In

[Bug c/77690] -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #5 from nsz

[Bug c++/77711] Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/77690] -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/77712] New: int() is incorrectly treated as a null pointer constant in C++11 and later

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77712 Bug ID: 77712 Summary: int() is incorrectly treated as a null pointer constant in C++11 and later Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/77711] New: Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711 Bug ID: 77711 Summary: Add fix-it hints for missing parentheses in member function call Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug testsuite/77710] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77710 Bug ID: 77710 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-4.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/77672] wrong rich location in warning: writing a terminating nul past the end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- BTW, if you do have a need to send a "print the whole string" request via class substring_loc, that could be handled by passing in INT_MAX as the idx values, which will lead to a failure. (we could make it

[Bug testsuite/77411] object-size-9.c -fpic -m32 failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77411 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Fri Sep 23 14:43:45 2016 New Revision: 240437 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240437=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-23 Bernd Edlinger Tom de

[Bug middle-end/77709] New: specified destination size warning does not work when cross-compiling from 64 host to 32bit target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77709 Bug ID: 77709 Summary: specified destination size warning does not work when cross-compiling from 64 host to 32bit target Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/77672] wrong rich location in warning: writing a terminating nul past the end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) > I think the general improvement I'm suggesting is to be able to put the > tilde(s) under or point the caret at any character of the format string, > including

[Bug preprocessor/77672] wrong rich location in warning: writing a terminating nul past the end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Sep 23 14:14:52 2016 New Revision: 240434 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240434=gcc=rev Log: Provide location information for terminator characters (PR preprocessor/77672)

[Bug c/77708] New: -Wformat-length %s warns for snprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77708 Bug ID: 77708 Summary: -Wformat-length %s warns for snprintf Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/77690] -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77697] suspicious code in tree-ssa-forwprop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77697 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77697] suspicious code in tree-ssa-forwprop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77697 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Sep 23 12:37:22 2016 New Revision: 240430 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240430=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-23 Richard Biener PR

[Bug fortran/77707] [5/6/7 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug c/77690] -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690 --- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > sprintf(foo, "zz%.4s", s.buf); > > Please let me know if this isn't sufficient to resolve the problem report. in my case truncation is fatal error so

[Bug tree-optimization/77677] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677 --- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Fri Sep 23 10:25:09 2016 New Revision: 240420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240420=gcc=rev Log: Drop TREE_OVERFLOW gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-09-23 Kugan Vivekanandarajah

[Bug fortran/77707] New: [4.5-7.0 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707 Bug ID: 77707 Summary: [4.5-7.0 Regression] formatted direct access: nextrec off by one Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/77706] Optimize away some local static constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77706 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77706] Optimize away some local static constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77706 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There might be a duplicate of this bug already.

[Bug tree-optimization/77705] Optimize away some static constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77705 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77706] New: Optimize away some local static constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77706 Bug ID: 77706 Summary: Optimize away some local static constructors Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/77705] New: Optimize away some static constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77705 Bug ID: 77705 Summary: Optimize away some static constructors Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/77704] Data race on std::cype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77704 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/77704] New: Data race on std::regex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77704 Bug ID: 77704 Summary: Data race on std::regex Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > we can't remove the stores because we still can't grok C++ new/delete. > > Is there a PR that tracks

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > we can't remove the stores because we still can't grok C++ new/delete. Is there a PR that tracks this issue?

[Bug fortran/77693] ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug debug/77692] [7 regression] gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/const-2b.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77692 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Ok, so tree_add_const_value_attribute_for_decl gives up because the decl is not readonly. But via add_location_or_const_value_attribute rtl_for_decl_location would get us (const_vector:V4SF [

[Bug fortran/77703] [6/7 Regression] ICE on assignment to pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77703 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/71652] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal, at config/i386/i386-c.c:187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71652] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal, at config/i386/i386-c.c:187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Sep 23 07:55:57 2016 New Revision: 240392 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240392=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR target/71652 PR target/71652 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug bootstrap/77695] [7 Regression] bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/77703] New: ICE on assignment to pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77703 Bug ID: 77703 Summary: ICE on assignment to pointer function Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug bootstrap/77695] [7 Regression] bootstrap failure due to undeclared hook_uint_uintp_false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/77697] suspicious code in tree-ssa-forwprop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77697 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77697] suspicious code in tree-ssa-forwprop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77697 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- No, the code doesn't make any sense at all. The following should fix most of the obvious errors. Index: gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c === ---