[Bug go/81449] runtime.inc:782:28: error: field ‘__sem_lock’ has incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81449 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/81449] runtime.inc:782:28: error: field ‘__sem_lock’ has incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81449 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks for reporting it.

[Bug target/70589] PowerPC target attribute/pragma cannot set/disable -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/81450] New: Typedef with assume aligned builtin yields segmentation fault in nested loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81450 Bug ID: 81450 Summary: Typedef with assume aligned builtin yields segmentation fault in nested loop Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/45896] [C++0x] Facet time_get not reading dates according to the IEEE 1003 standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to xyzdragon from comment #7) > Had this bug when trying "%m" formatter on input "7" input. Saw the comment > from 7 years ago "Can fix pretty quickly." and let out a desperate laugh. Is > C++11

[Bug middle-end/81445] Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81445 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #5) > Also it doesn't support these simple cases: > > void vla2(int x) > { > if (x == 10) > { > int arr[x]; > t (arr); > } > } Again, try something smaller. When

[Bug go/81449] runtime.inc:782:28: error: field ‘__sem_lock’ has incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81449 --- Comment #1 from martin --- Created attachment 41761 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41761=edit runtime.inc

[Bug rtl-optimization/79856] rtl_verify_edges: use internal_error instead of error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79856 Roland Illig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81445] Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81445 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #2) > > I don't see it happen for the simplest case in current trunk: > > 400 bytes is too large, try again with something smaller. (I'm

[Bug tree-optimization/81162] [8 Regression] UBSAN switch triggers incorrect optimization in SLSR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81162 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt

[Bug tree-optimization/81162] [8 Regression] UBSAN switch triggers incorrect optimization in SLSR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81162 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Jul 14 18:06:45 2017 New Revision: 250212 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250212=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-07-14 Bill Schmidt PR

[Bug go/81449] New: runtime.inc:782:28: error: field ‘__sem_lock’ has incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81449 Bug ID: 81449 Summary: runtime.inc:782:28: error: field ‘__sem_lock’ has incomplete type Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 martin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71504] bogus error: accessing value through a glvalue in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71504 Tom Westerhout changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kot.tom97 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/81300] -fpeephole2 breaks __builtin_ia32_sbb_u64, _subborrow_u64 on AMD64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86-*-* |x86 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/81375] [6/7/8 Regression] unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81375 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > Guess we'll need the PR81364 fix for that. Yes, although it would be good to require a "{" only if cprefix##_ecb_encrypt(...) actually expands to multiple

[Bug target/81375] [6/7/8 Regression] unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81375 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Jul 14 17:19:30 2017 New Revision: 250211 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250211=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-07-10 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/81300] -fpeephole2 breaks __builtin_ia32_sbb_u64, _subborrow_u64 on AMD64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81300 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Fri Jul 14 17:19:30 2017 New Revision: 250211 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250211=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2017-07-10 Uros Bizjak

[Bug tree-optimization/81346] Missed constant propagation into comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346 --- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8) > > I think always using an unsigned type for the range check would be simpler. > > If we try to check that x>=INT_MIN+2

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Guess we'll need the PR81364 fix for that.

[Bug middle-end/81445] Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81445 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #2) > I don't see it happen for the simplest case in current trunk: 400 bytes is too large, try again with something smaller. (I'm with you if you want to increase the

[Bug testsuite/68972] g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C test case fails on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68972 --- Comment #13 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Fri Jul 14 16:58:00 2017 New Revision: 250210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250210=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2017-07-14 Kelvin Nilsen

[Bug rtl-optimization/66669] FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-8.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #6 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Fri Jul 14 16:58:00 2017 New Revision: 250210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250210=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2017-07-14 Kelvin Nilsen

[Bug target/80101] ICE in store_data_bypass_p, at recog.c:3737

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80101 --- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Fri Jul 14 16:58:00 2017 New Revision: 250210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250210=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2017-07-14 Kelvin Nilsen

[Bug target/80103] ICE in output_1144, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:2298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80103 --- Comment #5 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Fri Jul 14 16:58:00 2017 New Revision: 250210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250210=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2017-07-14 Kelvin Nilsen

[Bug tree-optimization/81346] Missed constant propagation into comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8) > I think always using an unsigned type for the range check would be simpler. > If we try to check that x>=INT_MIN+2 && x<=INT_MAX-2 with -fwrapv, int is > still not

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- Not really: diff --git a/crypto/evp/evp_locl.h b/crypto/evp/evp_locl.h index 2bb709a..cb44ed8 100644 --- a/crypto/evp/evp_locl.h +++ b/crypto/evp/evp_locl.h @@ -71,8 +71,9 @@ #define

[Bug c++/80935] [C++1z] incorrect error 'uninitialized variable in constexpr function' when conditionally declaring variable inside lambda inside template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80935 Andrew Wong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew.kw.w at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/81346] Missed constant propagation into comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse --- I think always using an unsigned type for the range check would be simpler. If we try to check that x>=INT_MIN+2 && x<=INT_MAX-2 with -fwrapv, int is still not a suitable type in which to do

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks. I have no recommendation. I can not explain why your version of grep behaves differently than mine, and, since nobody else has reported this bug, apparently differently than everyone else's. I

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #16 from martin --- For clarification the duplicate of "/go/runtime/mksizeclasses.go > FILE" was a copy paste mistake.

[Bug middle-end/81445] Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81445 --- Comment #3 from Wilco --- There is also something buggy with the way alloca aligns, it always allocates 16 bytes too much...

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #15 from martin --- You are right! I did: sed '/^package /q' < /media/gcc-7.1.0/libgo/go/runtime/mksizeclasses.go > FILE

[Bug middle-end/81445] Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81445 --- Comment #2 from Wilco --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > Note that we already do it for VLA (aka BUILT_IN_ALLOCA_WITH_ALIGN) in CCP. I don't see it happen for the simplest case in current trunk: void t(int *); void vla(void) {

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/81448] New: False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448 Bug ID: 81448 Summary: False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #14 from Ian Lance Taylor --- OK, so the sed command works. Run the sed command redirecting standard output to a file, then see what this prints: grep '^// +build ' FILE It sounds like that will print nothing. The only way I

[Bug ada/81446] Building Ada on Linux m68k fails due to missing No_Elaboration_Code_All

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81446 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- I can confirm that the previously suggested patch fixes the issue.

[Bug middle-end/81445] Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81445 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Note that we already do it for VLA (aka BUILT_IN_ALLOCA_WITH_ALIGN) in CCP.

[Bug fortran/81447] New: gfortran fails to recognize the exact dynamic type of a polymorphic entity that was allocated in a external procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81447 Bug ID: 81447 Summary: gfortran fails to recognize the exact dynamic type of a polymorphic entity that was allocated in a external procedure Product: gcc

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #13 from martin --- Thanks for the fast reply. It prints: nas-02-90-38:/media/gcc-7.1.0/libgo# sed '/^package /q' < /media/gcc-7.1.0/libgo/go/runtime/mksizeclasses.go // Copyright 2016 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. // Use of

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Sorry, I meant: what does this print? sed '/^package /q' < SRCDIR/libgo/go/runtime/mksizeclasses.go

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #11 from martin --- nas-02-90-38:/media/gcc-7.1.0/libgo# sed Usage: sed [OPTION]... {script-only-if-no-other-script} [input-file]... -n, --quiet, --silent suppress automatic printing of pattern space -e script,

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor --- As far as I know your sed and grep are sufficiently up to date. What does the sed command by itself print on your system?

[Bug c++/81147] [avr] C++ for -mmcu=atmega2560 doesn't do NRVO or RVO when class inherits from empty base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- What you mean by "NRVO" and "RVO" ?

[Bug ada/81446] New: Building Ada on Linux m68k fails due to missing No_Elaboration_Code_All

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81446 Bug ID: 81446 Summary: Building Ada on Linux m68k fails due to missing No_Elaboration_Code_All Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 URL:

[Bug target/81312] Enable X86_TUNE_ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) > What are the code size/performance tradeoffs in 32bit/64bit mode with Intel > machines? Pavel, should we investigate it?

[Bug libstdc++/45896] [C++0x] Facet time_get not reading dates according to the IEEE 1003 standard.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896 xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xyzdragon at fastmail dot

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #9 from martin --- The OS is based on debian with some custom modification from Netgear. I thought I "upgraded" all neccessary libraries for gcc 7.1.0. ldconfig -V ldconfig (GNU libc) 2.3.2 sed --version GNU sed version 4.1.5

[Bug target/81312] Enable X86_TUNE_ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81312 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/59521] __builtin_expect not effective in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521 --- Comment #12 from Ulrich Drepper --- On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:17 PM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Maybe I miss something, but I would expect to sort all branches in > emit_case_decision_tree as either

[Bug middle-end/81445] New: Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81445 Bug ID: 81445 Summary: Dynamic stack allocation not optimized into static allocation Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor --- On my system I see this: > sed '/^package /q' < ~/gcc/gcc-7-branch/libgo/go/runtime/mksizeclasses.go | > grep '^// +build ' | cat // +build ignore That is, the command displays `// +build ignore`. The

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #3) > Yes. Ignoring GLIBC internals, mempcpy is used quite infrequently. As a > result not many targets have added highly optimized implementations. The > targets that do have the

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/81346] Missed constant propagation into comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41707|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/81444] expmed.c:init_expmed_one_mode uses wrong mode for widening cost computations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81444 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 41759 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41759=edit Proposed patch. PR middle-end/81444 * expmed.c (init_expmed_one_conv): Don't clobber all->reg's

[Bug target/71112] [6 Regression] ICE with -fpie on aarch64 ILP32 big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/81444] New: expmed.c:init_expmed_one_mode uses wrong mode for widening cost computations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81444 Bug ID: 81444 Summary: expmed.c:init_expmed_one_mode uses wrong mode for widening cost computations Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/59521] __builtin_expect not effective in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #10) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9) > > The patch works for me for the described case, but does not for PGO, which > > should do the same based on real

[Bug middle-end/59521] __builtin_expect not effective in switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521 --- Comment #10 from Yuri Gribov --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9) > The patch works for me for the described case, but does not for PGO, which > should do the same based on real numbers: Problem here is that we optimize only

[Bug other/80573] ICE: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80573 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/81030] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 (only) on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81030 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I've just taken look at that and please confirm that I understand that correctly: 1) we want to ideally a same function for expansion of memcpy and mempcpy, where for later one we'll append calculation of

[Bug middle-end/81443] New: gcc-7.1.0/MIPS N32: build/genrecog.o: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81443 Bug ID: 81443 Summary: gcc-7.1.0/MIPS N32: build/genrecog.o: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/81442] error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not during RTL pass: outof_cfglayout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1) > I'm currently testing if that also makes the test-case pass. It does.

[Bug gcov-profile/81442] error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not during RTL pass: outof_cfglayout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41758 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41758=edit Tentative patch I'm not sure how this is supposed to be fixed. But this is a point fix that at least allows lto1 to

[Bug sanitizer/81066] sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux_libcdep.cc:276:22: error: aggregate ‘sigaltstack handler_stack’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81066 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 14 09:10:45 2017 New Revision: 250200 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250200=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/81066 * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.h:

[Bug gcov-profile/81442] New: error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not during RTL pass: outof_cfglayout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81442 Bug ID: 81442 Summary: error: verify_flow_info: REG_BR_PROB is set but cfg probability is not during RTL pass: outof_cfglayout Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status:

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek --- The bug is fixed, you must be running into a different issue, either in the source you're compiling, or in the compiler. So, please open a new bugreport instead of commenting on a different one, and supply

[Bug fortran/81416] OpenMP craches if large arrays passed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81416 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug ipa/79765] [CHKP] ICE in create_target_clone in multiple_target.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79765 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/81416] OpenMP craches if large arrays passed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81416 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/79902] ICE in rebuild_frequencies, at predict.c:3689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79902 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/81416] OpenMP craches if large arrays passed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81416 --- Comment #4 from bz0815 at tirol dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > DOUBLE PRECISION,DIMENSION(n) :: b > > This array is on the stack. So DOUBLE PRECISION,DIMENSION(n) :: b is put on the stack if it is passed as

[Bug go/81421] Circular runtime.s-gox -> runtime.lo dependency dropped -> objcopy: 'runtime.s-gox.tmp': No such file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81421 --- Comment #7 from martin --- /media/gcc-7.1.0 is my source dir nas-02-90-38:/media/gcc-7.1.0# libgo/match.sh --goarch=sparc --goos=linux --srcdir=/media/gcc-7.1.0/libgo/go/runtime --extrafiles="runtime_sysinfo.go sigtab.go" --tag=libffi

[Bug driver/79659] Provide valid values for integer options (e.g. -Wformat) with --help= option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79659 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/79856] rtl_verify_edges: use internal_error instead of error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79856 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/81441] New: slowdown due to -fpeel-loops and -ftracer added by -fprofile-use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81441 Bug ID: 81441 Summary: slowdown due to -fpeel-loops and -ftracer added by -fprofile-use Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81396] [7/8 Regression] Optimization of reading Little-Endian 64-bit number with portable code has a regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81396 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Or both this bswap change and the match.pd addition. Doing both sounds good to me :-)