[Bug target/81652] [meta-bug] -fcf-protection=full bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652 Bug 81652 depends on bug 85485, which changed state. Bug 85485 Summary: Remove -mcet https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85485 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/85485] Remove -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85485 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81652] [meta-bug] -fcf-protection=full bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652 Bug 81652 depends on bug 85490, which changed state. Bug 85490 Summary: Missing STAGE4_CFLAGS in bootstrap-cet.mk https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85490 What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/85490] Missing STAGE4_CFLAGS in bootstrap-cet.mk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85490 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85509] fails to promote local static to const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85509 --- Comment #3 from ASA --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > The issue is you fail to make PerformQuickly and PerformSafely const and GCC > doesn't have local analysis to promote it so and IPA analysis is too late > for that since

[Bug fortran/85520] [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85521] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/85520] [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/85520] [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Apr 25 00:12:58 2018 New Revision: 259625 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259625=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-24 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85520] [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Apr 25 00:00:47 2018 New Revision: 259624 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259624=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-24 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85520] [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Apr 24 23:17:29 2018 New Revision: 259623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259623=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-24 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/85400] invalid Local Dynamic TLS relaxation for symbol defined in method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | Component|target

[Bug target/85492] riscv64: endless when throwing an exception from a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85492 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85492] riscv64: endless when throwing an exception from a constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85492 --- Comment #1 from Jim Wilson --- The testcase fails with default dynamic linking. It works with static linking. It also works if runtime_error is removed and we have just a plain throw. Using github riscv/riscv-gnu-toolchain project, which

[Bug bootstrap/85490] Missing STAGE4_CFLAGS in bootstrap-cet.mk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85490 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Apr 24 22:12:46 2018 New Revision: 259620 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259620=gcc=rev Log: x86/CET: Add -fcf-protection to STAGE4_CFLAGS Since profiledbootstrap uses

[Bug fortran/85520] [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/85521] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Likely r256944. This is for the test in comment 0. For the test in comment 1, I get the following change between r257064 and r257065 % /opt/gcc/gcc8p-257064p2/bin/gfortran pr85521_1.f90

[Bug fortran/85521] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/85513] symbol already defined error if using default invocable arguments with lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85513 --- Comment #2 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de --- Ok, I see. Many thanks for the hint and apologies for the duplicate.

[Bug libstdc++/71660] [6/7/8 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660 --- Comment #19 from Thiago Macieira --- And Qt has stopped complaining about this. https://codereview.qt-project.org/227296

[Bug c++/69560] x86_64: alignof(uint64_t) produces incorrect results with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69560 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71660] [6/7/8 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/58538] Injected class-name treated as type-name instead of template-name when used as a template-argument for a template template-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58538 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- cp/pt.c convert_template_argument has this code: /* Deal with an injected-class-name used as a template template arg. */ if (requires_tmpl_type && CLASS_TYPE_P (arg)) { tree t =

[Bug c/84923] gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c failed on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84923 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I proposed the following fix but I don't know the fix was approved or not: From: Vladimir Mezentsev When weakref_targets is not empty a target cannot be removed from

[Bug c++/85518] ICE mangling _FloatN types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85518 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- You still need some of the built-in functions for use with __float128 in C++ when that has a different format from long double. It's the built-in functions for types with the same format

[Bug c++/85518] ICE mangling _FloatN types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85518 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/58538] Injected class-name treated as type-name instead of template-name when used as a template-argument for a template template-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58538 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- For comment 2, Clang now accepts the code (since 5.0.0), and so does EDG. That seems correct according to [temp.local]. GCC still gets the original case in comment 0 wrong.

[Bug c++/85515] Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Also affects gcc 7 and gcc 6 branches.

[Bug target/85511] [X86] Using __builtin_ia32_writeeflags_u32 in 64-bit mode causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85511 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85514] g++ accepts invalid template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85514 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58538] Injected class-name treated as type-name instead of template-name when used as a template-argument for a template template-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58538 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug tree-optimization/85501] missed if-conversion / phiopt trick

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85501 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Take: void f(float *myVector, float *result, int i ) { for(int n = 0; n < 1024; n++) if (myVector[n] > 0.5){ result[n] = 0.8f; } else { result[n] = 0.1f; } } This loop does get vectorized at -O3 and

[Bug target/68256] Defining TARGET_USE_CONSTANT_BLOCKS_P causes go bootstrap failure on aarch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68256 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c/84923] gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c failed on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84923 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/85521] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- $ cat z2.f90 program p character(3) :: c = 'abc' character(3) :: z(1) z = [ c(:-2) ] print *, z end $ gfortran-8-20180422 -c z2.f90 z2.f90:4:0: z = [ c(:-2) ] Warning:

[Bug fortran/85521] New: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85521 Bug ID: 85521 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_character_array_constructor, at fortran/array.c:2049 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/85520] [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- Additional test cases : $ cat z3.f90 program p character(-huge(1_8)/2_8) :: c(2) = ' ' print *, len(c), size(c), c end $ gfortran-8-20180422 -c z3.f90 f951: out of memory

[Bug fortran/85520] New: [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85520 Bug ID: 85520 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Out of memory when declaring a character with len << 0 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85519] New: [nvptx, openacc, openmp, testsuite] Recursive tests may fail due to thread stack limit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85519 Bug ID: 85519 Summary: [nvptx, openacc, openmp, testsuite] Recursive tests may fail due to thread stack limit Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/84889] Ideas on revamping how we format diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889 --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm --- But what about parallel builds, where the errors can get interleaved?

[Bug c++/85518] New: ICE mangling _FloatN types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85518 Bug ID: 85518 Summary: ICE mangling _FloatN types Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #10 from

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Apr 24 16:58:49 2018 New Revision: 259614 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259614=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/85512: Tighten SIMD right shift immediate

[Bug target/85485] Remove -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85485 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Apr 24 16:56:04 2018 New Revision: 259613 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259613=gcc=rev Log: x86/CET: Remove the -mcet command-lint option With revision 259496: commit

[Bug target/85485] Remove -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85485 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Apr 24 16:54:35 2018 New Revision: 259612 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259612=gcc=rev Log: x86/CET tests: Remove -mcet/-mno-cet or replace -mcet with -mshstk With

[Bug target/85485] Remove -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85485 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Apr 24 16:47:24 2018 New Revision: 259611 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259611=gcc=rev Log: Don't bootstrap GCC with -mcet With revision 259496: commit

[Bug target/85511] [X86] Using __builtin_ia32_writeeflags_u32 in 64-bit mode causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85511 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 16:42:59 2018 New Revision: 259609 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259609=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85511 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_init_mmx_sse_builtins):

[Bug target/85485] Remove -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85485 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Apr 24 16:41:01 2018 New Revision: 259608 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259608=gcc=rev Log: x86/CET: Build target libraries with -mshstk With revision 259522: commit

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #7) > (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #6) > > (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #3) > > > > > > My feeling is that the target

[Bug rtl-optimization/85160] GCC generates mvn/and instructions instead of bic on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85160 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/85503] [8 Regression] ICE in replace_swapped_load_constant, at config/rs6000/rs6000-p8swap.c:1853 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85503 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85503] [8 Regression] ICE in replace_swapped_load_constant, at config/rs6000/rs6000-p8swap.c:1853 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85503 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 16:05:19 2018 New Revision: 259607 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259607=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85503 * config/rs6000/rs6000-p8swap.c

[Bug middle-end/85516] [missed-optimization] gcc does not convert multiple compares against constants to a shift+bitmask test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85516 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- UB only with -fstrict-enums which isn't the default.

[Bug c++/85513] symbol already defined error if using default invocable arguments with lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85513 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85516] [missed-optimization] gcc does not convert multiple compares against constants to a shift+bitmask test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85516 --- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity --- Interesting. Still missing optimizations - v cannot be larger than 9 (UB), and bt is faster than mov+shift+and.

[Bug middle-end/85516] [missed-optimization] gcc does not convert multiple compares against constants to a shift+bitmask test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85516 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/85081] [7 Regression] Sanitizer error with references in vectorized/parallel for-loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85081 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug ipa/84658] [7 Regression] -O3 -fmerge-all-constants causes incorrect for-each loop generation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84658 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug sanitizer/85394] [7 Regression] Unable to run sanitized executables on ppc64le Ubuntu and SLES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85394 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/85248] [6 Regression] Miscompilation when using error function that returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.1 Summary|[6/7

[Bug lto/85405] [6 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.1 Summary|[6/7

[Bug c++/85515] Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Some examples of using the leaky abstractions, adapted from the video: int main () { auto lambda = [val = 2](){ return val; }; //lambda.__val = 4; return lambda(); } On uncommenting the assignment,

[Bug sanitizer/85389] posix_memalign() crash with address sanitizer when passing invalid arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85389 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:19:32 2018 New Revision: 259604 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259604=gcc=rev Log: Backport r259459 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug lto/85405] [6/7 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:19:11 2018 New Revision: 259603 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259603=gcc=rev Log: Backport r259431 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug lto/85405] [6/7 Regression] ICE in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85405 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:18:57 2018 New Revision: 259602 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259602=gcc=rev Log: Backport r259429 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug lto/85248] [6/7 Regression] Miscompilation when using error function that returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:18:25 2018 New Revision: 259600 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259600=gcc=rev Log: Backport r259265 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug lto/85248] [6/7 Regression] Miscompilation when using error function that returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85248 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:18:42 2018 New Revision: 259601 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259601=gcc=rev Log: Backport r259274 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug c++/85517] New: std::variant exception safety problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85517 Bug ID: 85517 Summary: std::variant exception safety problems Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug sanitizer/85081] [7 Regression] Sanitizer error with references in vectorized/parallel for-loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85081 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:17:48 2018 New Revision: 259599 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259599=gcc=rev Log: Backport r258924 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug fortran/84963] [8 Regression] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84963 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:17:19 2018 New Revision: 259598 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259598=gcc=rev Log: Backport r258705 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport from

[Bug ipa/84658] [7 Regression] -O3 -fmerge-all-constants causes incorrect for-each loop generation.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84658 --- Comment #26 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 24 15:17:00 2018 New Revision: 259597 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259597=gcc=rev Log: Backport r258480 2018-04-24 Martin Liska Backport

[Bug middle-end/85516] New: [missed-optimization] gcc does not convert multiple compares against constants to a shift+bitmask test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85516 Bug ID: 85516 Summary: [missed-optimization] gcc does not convert multiple compares against constants to a shift+bitmask test Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status:

[Bug c++/85502] lambda capture is nameable - leaky abstraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85502 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/85515] Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/85515] Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Maybe the fields should be DECL_ARTIFICIAL and we shouldn't suggest such fields? Or we make them DECL_NAMELESS instead? [both have effects on debuginfo as well]

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] [7/8 Regression] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 --- Comment #12 from Andrey Belevantsev --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #11) > Thanks, I managed to reproduce it. The unusual thing here is hardreg 63 > being considered call-clobbered in its reg_raw_mode=TImode but not narrower

[Bug c++/85515] New: Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515 Bug ID: 85515 Summary: Bogus suggestions from "GCC's leaky abstractions" Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug c++/85514] New: g++ accepts invalid template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85514 Bug ID: 85514 Summary: g++ accepts invalid template code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/85508] runtime error in config/i386/i386.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85508 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/78497] compiling with -save-temps adds -Wimplicit-fallthrough warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78497 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug target/85508] runtime error in config/i386/i386.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85508 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 24 13:20:20 2018 New Revision: 259594 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259594=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85508 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 68071, which changed state. Bug 68071 Summary: Generic lambda variadic argument pack cannot be empty https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68071 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/64095] [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 68071 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/68071] Generic lambda variadic argument pack cannot be empty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68071 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 57443, which changed state. Bug 57443 Summary: Captured variable hide the parameter if they have the same name in Lambdas https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57443 What|Removed

[Bug c++/57443] Captured variable hide the parameter if they have the same name in Lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57443 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79133] lambda capture shadowing parameter & decltype confusion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79133 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kou4307 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/79133] lambda capture shadowing parameter & decltype confusion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79133 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug tree-optimization/85478] ICE with single element vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85478 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Tue Apr 24 12:18:26 2018 New Revision: 259593 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259593=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR85478 gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-04-24 Andreas Krebbel

[Bug c++/85513] New: symbol already defined error if using default invocable arguments with lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85513 Bug ID: 85513 Summary: symbol already defined error if using default invocable arguments with lambda expressions Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 --- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 44014 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44014=edit unreduced testcase (fully defined behavior at runtime, hopefully) $ aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -O

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The right-shift SIMD instructions don't allow a shift of zero. The left-shifting ones do. So I'd expect *aarch64_lshr_sisd_or_int_3 needs to be adjusted as well

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #2) > Indeed a SSHR by zero is not valid. > One would hope that the optimisers would have eliminated the shift by zero It can't be guaranteed. The reason the

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- What other shift instructions don't allow 0 immediates?

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Indeed a SSHR by zero is not valid. One would hope that the optimisers would have eliminated the shift by zero by this point but the constraints on the *aarch64_ashr_sisd_or_int_si3 pattern need

[Bug target/85512] [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85512] New: [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85512 Bug ID: 85512 Summary: [8 Regression] gcc generating non-existing sshr with immh == 0 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

  1   2   >