[Bug c/82063] issues with arguments enabled by -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/85768] [9 Regression] FreeBSD bootstrap fails due to undefined reference to 'backtrace'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85768 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/85768] [9 Regression] FreeBSD bootstrap fails due to undefined reference to 'backtrace'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85768 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/85768] New: FreeBSD bootstrap fails due to undefined reference to 'backtrace'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85768 Bug ID: 85768 Summary: FreeBSD bootstrap fails due to undefined reference to 'backtrace' Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/85767] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85767 Bug ID: 85767 Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/85766] New: Containing_Directory in Ada.Directories is confused by a trailing separator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85766 Bug ID: 85766 Summary: Containing_Directory in Ada.Directories is confused by a trailing separator Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/85675] parameters from other modules in openmp default(none) not specified in enclosing 'parallel'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85675 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/85742] [8/9 Regression] sizeof allocatable arrays returning wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85742 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85742] [8/9 Regression] sizeof allocatable arrays returning wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85742 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 13 18:07:54 2018 New Revision: 260215 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260215=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85742 *

[Bug fortran/72755] Internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1369

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 72755, which changed state. Bug 72755 Summary: Internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1369 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/63529] Bad error and ICE with Cray Pointers in Modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/63529] Bad error and ICE with Cray Pointers in Modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529 --- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun May 13 17:18:05 2018 New Revision: 260213 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260213=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-13 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85742] [8/9 Regression] sizeof allocatable arrays returning wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85742 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 13 17:01:16 2018 New Revision: 260211 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260211=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85742 *

[Bug fortran/72755] Internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1369

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #11 from

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-w64-mingw32 | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/85765] [8/9 Regression] Missing SFINAE in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765 --- Comment #4 from Casey Carter --- Narrowing the error down: template())), decltype(*U(),0) = 0> U g(T& t, long) { return begin(t); } // #1 prog.cc: In instantiation of 'U g(T&, long int) [with T = volatile il; U = int*; decltype (((*

[Bug fortran/85742] [8/9 Regression] sizeof allocatable arrays returning wrong value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85742 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44125 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44125=edit patch for the PR

[Bug c++/85765] [8/9 Regression] Missing SFINAE in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- But that patch is also on gcc-7-branch and the testcases work with gcc version 7.3.1 20180419, so there must have been something latent on trunk that was revealed by that change.

[Bug c++/85765] [8/9 Regression] Missing SFINAE in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Those volatile overloads in std::bind are a constant source of problems (most recently PR 85118). The regression happened with r258407: PR c++/84785 - ICE with alias template and default

[Bug c++/85765] [8/9 Regression] Missing SFINAE in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85765] Missing SFINAE in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/80165] Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80165 --- Comment #8 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Sun May 13 10:36:12 2018 New Revision: 260209 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260209=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/80165 * testsuite/20_util/variant/80165.cc: New. Added:

[Bug c++/85765] New: Missing SFINAE in default template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85765 Bug ID: 85765 Summary: Missing SFINAE in default template argument Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/70864] internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70864 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68846] Pointer function as LValue doesn't work when the assignment regards a dummy argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68846] Pointer function as LValue doesn't work when the assignment regards a dummy argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 13 08:34:50 2018 New Revision: 260208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260208=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68846 PR

[Bug fortran/70864] internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70864 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 13 08:34:50 2018 New Revision: 260208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260208=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/68846 PR

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #13) > Remains now: > > 1) add support for PIC access to the guard > 2) finish cleanup of the patch Except for a few missing comments, it's all there.