[Bug rtl-optimization/87902] [9 Regression] Shrink-wrapping multiple conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- Oh sure, if all you want to do is extend the prepare_shrinkwrap function, that just works there and it doesn't need to do a lot of profitability trade-offs. However it isn't very effective there. It's

[Bug c/85562] -Wsuggest-attribute=malloc misleads about "returning normally"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85562 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #3) > Fix for PR85734 also fixes this bug. That one is fixed on trunk, apparently. So, same for this one?

[Bug tree-optimization/84648] Missed optimization : loop not removed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84648 --- Comment #4 from bin cheng --- Author: amker Date: Thu Nov 15 03:44:49 2018 New Revision: 266171 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266171=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/84648 * tree-ssa-loop-niter.c

[Bug other/56334] __attribute__((aligned)) documentation is misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56334 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/56334] __attribute__((aligned)) documentation is misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56334 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 15 02:55:26 2018 New Revision: 266170 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266170=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-15 Sandra Loosemore PR other/56334 gcc/

[Bug tree-optimization/88029] New: [9 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.c:1974

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88029 Bug ID: 88029 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.c:1974 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/45225] gcc accepts ill-formed template code combining Variadic Templates and Partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45225 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > AFAICT the patch in comment 5 fixes the tests in comments 1 and 5, but not > the test in comment 0. % cat a.f90 program p real :: a, b

[Bug middle-end/31377] wrap_help error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31377 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug lto/55102] The options -flto and -On do not behave as described in GCC docs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/55102] The options -flto and -On do not behave as described in GCC docs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 15 00:41:10 2018 New Revision: 266168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266168=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-14 Sandra Loosemore PR lto/55102 PR

[Bug lto/56700] Optimizing at compile and link result in different binary size than only optimizing at link time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56700 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 15 00:41:10 2018 New Revision: 266168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266168=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-14 Sandra Loosemore PR lto/55102 PR

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT the patch in comment 5 fixes the tests in comments 1 and 5, but not the test in comment 0.

[Bug fortran/88025] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88025 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/88026] Explicit deduction guide fails for move-only type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88026 --- Comment #2 from toe-ger at web dot de --- Workaround that seems to generally work: Change deduction guide to template S(T&&)->S>;

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #4 from kargl

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 --- Comment #4 from boger at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 45005 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45005=edit Hack workaround to show bad loop Through my debugging I found that if I add the print statement as shown in

[Bug target/88027] PowerPC generates slightly weird code for memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88027 --- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- This appears to have to do with alignment. In this test case, expand_block_clear() sees alignment of only 8 bits for the pointer p. If you declare a local struct st and pass that to

[Bug rtl-optimization/87718] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-concatv2si-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- In general moving from propagation of hard regs is good thing for RA. Although there are exception as this PR. The problem starts with IRA. It decides that r91 should be a general regs based on

[Bug target/88027] PowerPC generates slightly weird code for memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88027 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/88028] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- ICE started with r240802. Before that: 88028.C: In instantiation of ‘constexpr const auto R::h’: 88028.C:16:34: required from ‘struct R’ 88028.C:23:24: required from here 88028.C:16:34: error: invalid

[Bug c++/87893] [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12557 on arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87893 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/88028] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/88028] New: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028 Bug ID: 88028 Summary: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6159 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/88027] PowerPC generates slightly weird code for memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88027 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 45004 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45004=edit File that shows the problem I changed the test not to return 0 between showing the test and the code generated.

[Bug target/88027] PowerPC generates slightly weird code for memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88027 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu-*,

[Bug c++/80864] [7/8/9/ Regression] Brace-initialization of a constexpr variable of an array in a POD triggers ICE from templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80864 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/61727] #pragma simd is undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61727 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/88027] New: PowerPC generates slightly weird code for memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88027 Bug ID: 88027 Summary: PowerPC generates slightly weird code for memset Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/88026] Explicit deduction guide fails for move-only type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88026 --- Comment #1 from toe-ger at web dot de --- Godbolt decided to swap the output from gcc and msvc again. Sorry for that.

[Bug c++/64035] [C++11] ICE in reshape_init_r when using initializer list aggregate initialization for default function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64035 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/82738] [meta-bug] issues with the -Og optimization level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/82738] [meta-bug] issues with the -Og optimization level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738 Bug 82738 depends on bug 59658, which changed state. Bug 59658 Summary: Document -f* flags enabled by -Og https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/59658] Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59832] [c++11] ICE in reshape_init_class with initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/87989] [8/9 Regression] Calling operator T() invokes wrong conversion operator overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- It might be related to Bug 86246 then.

[Bug middle-end/59658] Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Nov 14 20:05:13 2018 New Revision: 266162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266162=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-14 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-end/59658

[Bug c++/80864] Brace-initialization of a constexpr variable of an array in a POD triggers ICE from templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80864 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/80864] Brace-initialization of a constexpr variable of an array in a POD triggers ICE from templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80864 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janniksilvanus at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/86931] constexpr variable initialization: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_r, at cp/decl.c:6042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86931 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88025] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88025 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/87896] [9 Regression] ICE in verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87896 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/87468] [9 Regression] ice "wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87468 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 87896 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/87898] [8 Regression] ICE in separate_decls_in_region_debug, at tree-parloops.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87898 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/87989] [8/9 Regression] Calling operator T() invokes wrong conversion operator overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88006 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/87462] [7/8/9 Regression] undefined reference error occurs when -g, -fdebug-types-section and -O2 are used at the same time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Wed Nov 14 19:30:47 2018 New Revision: 266158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266158=gcc=rev Log: [debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined ref

[Bug debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88006 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Wed Nov 14 19:30:47 2018 New Revision: 266158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266158=gcc=rev Log: [debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined ref

[Bug debug/87462] [7/8/9 Regression] undefined reference error occurs when -g, -fdebug-types-section and -O2 are used at the same time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/87977] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 4 follows the use)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87977 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88026] New: Explicit deduction guide fails for move-only type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88026 Bug ID: 88026 Summary: Explicit deduction guide fails for move-only type Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgomp/87995] [9 regression] libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/cancel-taskgroup-3.c fails consistently after r265930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87995 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can't reproduce on x86_64-linux, tried 2048 invocations of the testcase in a row, times various OMP_NUM_THREADS settings (32, 64, 1, 2, 4, 8). All on 16c32t machine. So, can you build it with additional -g

[Bug rtl-optimization/87468] [9 Regression] ice "wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87468 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/59658] Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/55227] designated initializer for char array by string constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55227 J.R. Heisey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jr at heisey dot org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/87156] [9 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ for mips64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87156 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #9

[Bug target/87285] [9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_class_check (tree.h:3235) with -O2 -std=gnu++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87285 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/88023] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 39 does not dominate use in block 34)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88023 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 --- Comment #3 from boger at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 45003 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45003=edit Reproducer testcase for gccgo testresults failures in GCD You should be able to build this using gccgo:

[Bug tree-optimization/88015] [9 Regression] ICE in dump_printf_loc, at dumpfile.c:1287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2) > Actually, I'm still not able to reproduce this, but the fix seems obvious; > am working on it. I see it on multiple examples: $ g++

[Bug fortran/88025] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88025 Bug ID: 88025 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4468 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79426] [7/8/9 Regression] fortran - internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426 --- Comment #8 from G. Steinmetz --- And to make the picture complete, if you _add_ another integer (regarding comment 5), it compiles silently (but breaks at run time). $ cat z2.f90 program p type t integer :: a integer :: b

[Bug sanitizer/88022] Support dynamic shadow offset in ASan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79426] [7/8/9 Regression] fortran - internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426 --- Comment #7 from G. Steinmetz --- And with type "t" stripped down to a class only, respectively. Case analogous to the one in comment 3. $ cat zc2.f90 program p type t class(*), pointer :: u(:) end type type(t) :: z

[Bug fortran/79426] [7/8/9 Regression] fortran - internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426 --- Comment #6 from G. Steinmetz --- In all za* examples above reduce the type by an integer variable. Now type "t" contains one integer and one class(*) : $ cat zb2.f90 program p type t integer :: a class(*), pointer :: u(:)

[Bug fortran/79426] [7/8/9 Regression] fortran - internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #5 from G.

[Bug fortran/79440] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2373

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79440 --- Comment #4 from G. Steinmetz --- Reduced test case from comment 0 : $ cat z3.f90 module m type t end type type t2 class(t), pointer :: a end type type, extends(t2) :: t3 end type type t4 class(t2), pointer

[Bug tree-optimization/88011] [9 regression] r266028 causes a bunch of go failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011 --- Comment #2 from boger at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > C testcase anyone? ;) I never succeeded extracting anything meaningful from > the Go testsuite logs to be able to reproduce sth (no cut possible). I

[Bug c++/87521] [C++][ABI] Tail padding not reused for non POD struct with defaulted/deleted special member function as per Itanium ABI on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521 Bruno Bugs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87521] [C++][ABI] Tail padding not reused for non POD struct with defaulted/deleted special member function as per Itanium ABI on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- What really matters here is triviality of the destructor, and that isn't affected by the user-declared defaulted dtor. Clang fails this test, because memcpy overwrites the tail padding: #include

[Bug driver/88024] New: At -O0 and -Og, GCC should warn if you explicitly try to enable an option that is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88024 Bug ID: 88024 Summary: At -O0 and -Og, GCC should warn if you explicitly try to enable an option that is ignored Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85594] ICE during expand when compiling with -fwrapv -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85594 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/87521] [C++][ABI] Tail padding not reused for non POD struct with defaulted/deleted special member function as per Itanium ABI on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- The C++03 definition of POD struct (which is what matters for the ABI) requires that it has no user-defined destructor. Your type has a user-declared destructor, which is implicitly-defined when odr-used.

[Bug bootstrap/86739] [9 Regression] Bootstrap broken with host GCC 4.1.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86739 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 14 16:43:38 2018 New Revision: 266152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266152=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/86739 * hash-map.h

[Bug c++/87521] [C++][ABI] Tail padding not reused for non POD struct with defaulted/deleted special member function as per Itanium ABI on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87521 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The meaning of "user-declared" in C++03 is closer to "has a function body" than the meaning in C++11, where it includes defaulted definitions. A defaulted definition in C++11 is equivalent to an implicit

[Bug sanitizer/88022] Support dynamic shadow offset in ASan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- The dynamic offset code has the problem that a) it is usually larger b) usually slower c) ABI incompatible.

[Bug sanitizer/88022] Support dynamic shadow offset in ASan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022 --- Comment #2 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think nothing prevents us from trying several ranges, the question is whether upstream guys will accept this... I've just noticed that the code for dynamic shadow offset is already present in

[Bug rtl-optimization/88018] [8/9 Regression] ICE in insert_insn_on_edge at cfgrtl.c:1952 since r255066

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88018 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45002 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45002=edit gcc9-pr88018.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/88023] New: [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 39 does not dominate use in block 34)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88023 Bug ID: 88023 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 39 does not dominate use in block 34) Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug target/86891] [9 Regression] wrong code with -O -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86891 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||collison at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/86575] [7/8 Regression] -Wimplicit-fallthrough affects code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86575 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] |[7/8 Regression]

[Bug rtl-optimization/85925] [7/8/9 regression] Mis-compilation at -02, masking with 257 goes wrong in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925 --- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou --- Then people realized that there was a problem if the SUBREGs were spilled onto the stack at some point, hence an additional test on LOAD_EXTEND_OP: r8787 | wilson | 1995-01-21 03:23:10 +0100 (Sat, 21 Jan

[Bug tree-optimization/88015] [9 Regression] ICE in dump_printf_loc, at dumpfile.c:1287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] Missing division optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 --- Comment #12 from Wilco --- It looks the only case left to do is f5: x * C <= 0.0 -> x <= 0.0 if C >= 1.0 x * C <= 0.0 -> x < FLT_MIN/C if C < 1.0

[Bug middle-end/86575] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wimplicit-fallthrough affects code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86575 --- Comment #4 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Nov 14 15:43:54 2018 New Revision: 266148 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266148=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR middle-end/86575 PR middle-end/86575 * gimplify.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/85925] [7/8/9 regression] Mis-compilation at -02, masking with 257 goes wrong in combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85925 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou --- OK, it's probably time to concede final defeat, although this will bring back quite a few redundant extensions on RISC architectures like ARM and SPARC. For the records, here's a bit of history about this

[Bug tree-optimization/88015] [9 Regression] ICE in dump_printf_loc, at dumpfile.c:1287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Actually, I'm still not able to reproduce this, but the fix seems obvious; am working on it.

[Bug tree-optimization/88015] [9 Regression] ICE in dump_printf_loc, at dumpfile.c:1287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/87985] Compile-time and memory hog w/ -O1 -ftree-slp-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87985 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug go/87470] [9 Regression] libgo/go/runtime/malloc.go failed to build with -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87470 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88009] [9 Regression] ICE in find_intrinsic_vtab, at fortran/class.c:2761

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88009 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87985] Compile-time and memory hog w/ -O1 -ftree-slp-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87985 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 14 14:33:44 2018 New Revision: 266147 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266147=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-14 Richard Biener PR middle-end/87985 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/88018] [8/9 Regression] ICE in insert_insn_on_edge at cfgrtl.c:1952 since r255066

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88018 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/87946] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_walk_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:10506

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87946 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/87917] ICE in initialize_matrix_A at gcc/tree-data-ref.c:3150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87917 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/87709] c++17 class template argument deduction not working in a very specific case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-10-23 00:00:00 |2018-11-14 See

[Bug fortran/87980] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get, at fortran/trans-array.c for assignment on allocatable polymorphic variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87980 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88020] Deduction guides fail inside sizeof

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88020 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87709] c++17 class template argument deduction not working in a very specific case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toe-ger at web dot de --- Comment #5

  1   2   >